Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Men, the Gender Wars Are Over We Won
Pajamas Media ^ | Nov. 29 | Matt Patterson

Posted on 11/30/2009 12:32:34 PM PST by AJKauf

Confidential Memo

To: All Men

Re: Operation “Feminist Movement”

Men, our long twilight struggle with the opposite sex is over. Our victory is total.

Can you believe the way things used to be? Remember when our fathers and grandfathers would drag themselves to mind-numbing jobs every day, having the sole responsibility for the feeding, clothing, and housing of their entire family?

And things were no easier before marriage, when men’s quest for sexual satisfaction was all too often hampered by the widespread moral code which taught women not to give out the “milk” for “free.”

Well, that state of affairs just wouldn’t do. So we men came together and did what we do best — formulate and implement a plan. First step, design the perfect world, the perfect male world. We decided such a world would consist of two things: less responsibility and more — and no-strings — sex.....

(Excerpt) Read more at pajamasmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: genderwars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

1 posted on 11/30/2009 12:32:34 PM PST by AJKauf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

“We won?” Is the writer of this a woman?


2 posted on 11/30/2009 12:33:49 PM PST by MNDude (The Republican Congress Economy--1995-2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

Somehow taking my wife out to celebrate doesn’t sound like a good idea...


3 posted on 11/30/2009 12:34:29 PM PST by GregNH ("Dc Rally from the Ground" by me http://gwgjlm.blogspot.com/2009/09/dc-rally-from-ground.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

I have to agree with this piece 100%.


4 posted on 11/30/2009 12:36:43 PM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

Nope, this guy’s right.

By tricking women into believing that lifetime monogomous relationships with men was the equivalent of slavery (instead of the MOST empowering construct possible),

men have entered the world of “free milk”.

If the woman gets too “bothersome”, men can just move on.

Won’t be too long before women are just one of many “wives” and carrying water on their heads for their families because they can’t convince a man to do something to alleviate this drudgery.


5 posted on 11/30/2009 12:37:15 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf
I think we men came in second . My exes say I am number two .
6 posted on 11/30/2009 12:37:57 PM PST by kbennkc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

No. Especially when there are battles still being fought on occasion in my home.


7 posted on 11/30/2009 12:38:12 PM PST by Jagdgewehr (The GOP faithful want me to believe I have only two voting options......"bad" and "worse")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

they need to work on the car and changing a wheel though before we can say we won.


8 posted on 11/30/2009 12:42:38 PM PST by manc (Marriage is between a man and a woman, end of. -end racism end affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

Try saving your unborn child from and abortion, then tell us how men won.


9 posted on 11/30/2009 12:44:57 PM PST by papertyger (Representation without taxation is tyranny!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

Well, it’s kind of satire...and men ‘won’ if they don’t get married...


10 posted on 11/30/2009 12:49:01 PM PST by CatQuilt (Lover of cats =^..^= and quilts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

Sadly, sadly, sadly true.


11 posted on 11/30/2009 12:49:38 PM PST by pepperdog (As Israel goes, so goes America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatQuilt

ah...he’s single.


12 posted on 11/30/2009 12:50:39 PM PST by MNDude (The Republican Congress Economy--1995-2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

I was watching Last of the Mohicans again last night when the Huron (cannibals) chief was assigning fate for four whites, the decision was that one man would be ransomed back to the Brits, one man would just walk away, one woman would be assigned to marry a superstud warrior and the last woman would be burned alive.

The two men were male chauvinist pigs that kept yelling “no, burn me instead” the winner tricked the other guy and got to be burned alive in place of the woman, who got set free, allowed to date others.


13 posted on 11/30/2009 12:54:58 PM PST by ansel12 (Scozzafava/Romney 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf
these days my nieces tell me they do not like to date. they basically meet up with each other (boys and girls) and see what evolves. This in my opinion is horrible conditioning for young women.

To begin with it basically says I am a product to be taken for a test drive over and over again and not worthy of even an investment of your time and money. These girls think they are the ones testing the 'product,' yet women have more of an emotional investment more often than men initially and if the young girls 'give away' even a kiss under these 'test run' conditions they will often find themselves giving away the farm for free and left to bear the calving alone.

14 posted on 11/30/2009 12:56:37 PM PST by GOP Poet (Obama is an OLYMPIC failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

I sure won.

My ex was a very good looking woman, but she was useless. She just didn’t tend to me or her chores very well and after many years (too many), I still coudn’t teach her to leave the toilet seat up and, well, I just coudn’t take the mediocrity anymore and tossed her out on her very pretty butt.

That was almost 20 years ago. I’ve never remarried as there are plenty of very pretty ladies out there I can borrow for short periods of time with no financial or moral responsibilities on my part. /s


15 posted on 11/30/2009 12:56:58 PM PST by umgud (I couldn't understand why the ball kept getting bigger......... then it hit me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

You must read the entire article to understand why the author is declaring WE WON (and he means ‘men’).


16 posted on 11/30/2009 12:57:26 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

The author makes some very valid points. Feminists and Lawyers have destroyed the institute of marriage. Essentially, there is NOTHING in it for men. Not a single thing.

Sex? Nope, can get that without marriage. Security? Nope. Financial perks? No.

Men more than double their responsibility, with not a single benefit at all. Lose half of what you own, anything you earn while being married is split 50/50. In some cases, you pay her money after the divorce, until she decides she wants to re-marry (but why would she ever do that when she can just shack-up and keep getting your income?). She is the de-facto custodian of the children, unless you can PROVE she is unfit, and even then the judge may give the children to the mother in spite of mental illness, abuse or abandonment.

There is no social stigma for fathering children out of wedlock, just that inconvenient child-support check. Women can have anyone father the child; but the husband is stuck with the child-support. There is no financial incentive to get married, in fact there is a tax penalty. With all these dis-incentives to get married, it’s amazing that any marriages still take place.

Can you imagine the conversation if a man told his date “After we marry, I think I’ll just quit working and stay at home; maybe have you get pregnant and have a baby; then I’ll stay home and raise the children while you work 2 jobs”. No, that man would be considered a ‘loser’ and dumped immediately; however if the roles are reversed the man is expected to simply accept this change in roles.

Femminism has done a great deal of damage, and the damage has yet to even be acknowledged; let alone corrected.


17 posted on 11/30/2009 12:57:40 PM PST by Hodar (Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatQuilt

Why don’t we just jump into the abyss?

We can do like China and kill all female babies. (we kinda are anyway).

Since life is essentially meaningless, lining liberals against the wall and shooting them will be ok.

Also, we need to build a golden calf on the lawn of the White House, and have doctors abort late third trimester babies on the altar.


18 posted on 11/30/2009 1:02:00 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MrB
"Won’t be too long before women are just one of many “wives” and carrying water on their heads for their families because they can’t convince a man to do something to alleviate this drudgery."

That's already happening in the Black community except, you're carrying the water.

19 posted on 11/30/2009 1:02:28 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

“we won?” is the writer stark raving mad?


20 posted on 11/30/2009 1:03:19 PM PST by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson