Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Google to limit free news access (The Rupert Murdoch Effect?)
BBC News ^ | 12/1/09 | BBC

Posted on 12/01/2009 6:24:45 PM PST by NormsRevenge

Newspaper publishers will now be able to set a limit on the number of free news articles people can read through Google, the company has announced.

The concession follows claims from some media companies that the search engine is profiting from online news pages.

Publishers will join a First Click Free programme that will prevent web surfers from having unrestricted access.

Users who click on more than five articles in a day may be routed to payment or registration pages.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.bbc.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: access; dbm; free; google; news

1 posted on 12/01/2009 6:24:46 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Hopefully, other search engines will be able to fill the niche.


2 posted on 12/01/2009 6:26:16 PM PST by bannie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Choose wisely, grasshopper. you have but five clicks and then you must pay. save a click or two for later in the day.


3 posted on 12/01/2009 6:27:19 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. May yur bandwidth exceed your girth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
...the search engine is profiting from online news pages.

How? There are no ads on the Google News pages. Just news stories and links.

4 posted on 12/01/2009 6:28:02 PM PST by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bannie

This could be a real shock for all those who Google for news.

nice to have a lot of alternatives,, for now.


5 posted on 12/01/2009 6:28:27 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. May yur bandwidth exceed your girth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Sounds good to me. Fewer fews of propaganda coming up. Film at eleven.


6 posted on 12/01/2009 6:33:28 PM PST by DoughtyOne (A MELTING POT not a potters wheel. Join us. Don't try to turn this nation into the one you fled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Let the count down to reversal due to unintended consequences begin.

I want to buy a square in the pool for 7 months.


7 posted on 12/01/2009 6:34:58 PM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Fine with me, I got lots of stuff to do besides read news...and I can ALWAYS listen to Rush.

Have at it Google.


8 posted on 12/01/2009 6:36:20 PM PST by BobL (Real Men don't use Tag Lines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Well unless they are going to make google subscribe only then this won’t work. All you will have to do is to clear your cookies. If it is subscribe only then a lot of people won’t use Google anymore.


9 posted on 12/01/2009 6:37:14 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

How?

This is an easy one. People go to google for their news driving google as the main portal to the Internet for finding stuff. This allows google to charge higher ad revenues to others. Whether there is an ad on news searches or not, plus google gets to learn from the searches.


10 posted on 12/01/2009 6:38:51 PM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Revel

That’s what I was thinking. In Private browing in IE8 would get around this if it’s cookie based.

But really google should be paying for the news they index and serve (if the news sites want to charge for it).


11 posted on 12/01/2009 6:40:26 PM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Shrug. There are tons of free news websites.


12 posted on 12/01/2009 6:43:41 PM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

all I ever read are the excerpts from FR anyway, oh and the comments.


13 posted on 12/01/2009 6:44:07 PM PST by bethelgrad (Chaplain serving my beloved Marine Corps in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I think this only means five stories per source, there aren’t many days where I would look at five stories from a single newspaper.


14 posted on 12/01/2009 6:44:45 PM PST by ansel12 (Scozzafava/Romney 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

That means I won’t even click once :)


15 posted on 12/01/2009 6:51:31 PM PST by Trillian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Been wondering where the lawyers went who talked the WarshPost and LAT into suing FR ~ guess Murdock hired them.

Here's the problem ~ if you put your stuff on limited access no one goes there. All the free advertising a place like FR can be for your product goes to waste.

The "newsies" have to learn how to do it for advertising ~ and just because advertising technology is not up to the standards that will be required doesn't mean it'll always be that way.

3 D animation is around the corner ~ the super artists who will make it possible for advertisers to easily use are in training as we speak.

16 posted on 12/01/2009 6:59:35 PM PST by muawiyah (Git Out The Way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori; blam; muawiyah; Nachum; appalachian_dweller; SunkenCiv; Rushmore Rocks

*ping*


17 posted on 12/01/2009 7:11:02 PM PST by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Interesting. All this means is that it will open a door for other search engines to compete with google. The newspapers tried to do it to radio when it fist came out. Then Television tried to do it to the internet. Now the search engines are trying to control access to news. Some news crawl site will open up to compete with google and take lurkers away too.


18 posted on 12/01/2009 7:18:32 PM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

They’re going to hurt their businesses. Make a deal with Google if they want, but by limiting click throughs folks will just give up and ignore their sites all together. The product isn’t that important and variations on the same information can be gotten elsewhere.


19 posted on 12/01/2009 7:22:36 PM PST by kristinn (A conspiracy of silence speaks louder than words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bethelgrad

Ditto.


20 posted on 12/01/2009 7:26:21 PM PST by MotorCityBuck (Page 73, Johnson, Navin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie

Thanks for the ping related

http://www.forbes.com/2009/12/01/rupert-murdoch-ftc-business-media-murdoch.html


21 posted on 12/01/2009 7:44:27 PM PST by FromLori (FromLori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson