Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donald Prothero’s Imaginary Evidence for Evolution (yet another evo hoax!)
Evolution News & Views ^ | December 1, 2009 | Jonathan Wells, Ph.D.

Posted on 12/01/2009 6:39:06 PM PST by GodGunsGuts

Need evidence for Darwinian evolution? Just make it up.

That’s the lesson of Donald Prothero’s book, Evolution: What the Fossils Say and Why It Matters (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007). Prothero is a professor of geology at Occidental College in Los Angeles. On November 30, he teamed up with atheist Michael Shermer (founding publisher of Skeptic Magazine) to debate Stephen Meyer and Richard Sternberg of the Discovery Institute.

Shermer wrote the foreword to Prothero’s book, calling it “the best book ever written on the subject.” In fact, “Don’s visual presentation of the fossil and genetic evidence for evolution is so unmistakably powerful that I venture to say that no one could read this book and still deny the reality of evolution.”

Of course, “evolution” can mean many things, most of which nobody would deny even without Prothero’s book. For example, evolution can mean simply change over time, or minor changes in existing species (“microevolution”), neither of which any sane person doubts. Both Shermer and Prothero, however, make it clear that by “evolution” they mean Darwin’s theory that all living things are descended from a common ancestor, modified principally by natural selection acting on unguided variations (“macroevolution”).

The modern version of the theory asserts that new variations originate in genetic mutations. Some of the most dramatic mutations occur in “Hox genes,” which can determine which appendages develop in various parts of the body. On page 101 of his book, Prothero shows pictures of two Hox gene mutations: “antennapedia,” which causes a fruit fly to sprout legs instead of antennae from its head, and “ultrabithorax,” which causes a fruit fly to develop a second pair of wings from it midsection. But both of these are harmful: A fruit fly with legs sticking out of its head is at an obvious disadvantage, and a four-winged fruit fly has no flight muscles in its extra pair of wings, so it has trouble flying and mating. Both mutants can survive only in the laboratory; in the wild they would quickly be eliminated by natural selection.

Some Darwinists have suggested that ancestral four-winged fruit flies could have evolved by mutation into modern two-winged fruit flies. But this explanation doesn’t work, because a two-winged fly hasn’t simply lost a pair of wings; it has acquired a large and complex gene (ultrabithorax) that enables it to develop “halteres,” or balancers. The halteres are located behind the fly’s normal pair of wings and vibrate rapidly to stabilize the insect in flight. So the two-winged fly represents the gain—not loss—of an important structure. (See Chapter 9 of my book Icons of Evolution).

Prothero ignores the evidence and suggests that ancestral four-winged flies simply mutated into modern two-winged flies. Modern four-winged mutants, he writes on page 101, “have apparently changed their regulatory genes so that ancestral wings appeared instead of halteres.”

Not only does Prothero ignore the evidence from developmental genetics, but he also invents an imaginary animal to complete the story he wants us to believe. Page 195 of his book carries an illustration of an eighteen-winged dragonfly next to a normal four-winged dragonfly, with the following caption: “The evolutionary mechanism by which Hox genes allow arthropods to make drastic changes in their number and arrangement of segments and appendages, producing macroevolutionary changes with a few simple mutations.”

dragonfly.JPG

Yet there is no evidence that eighteen-winged dragonflies ever existed. There are lots of dragonflies in the fossil record, but none of them remotely resemble this fictitious creature.

No matter. In what Michael Shermer calls “the best book ever written on the subject,” Donald Prothero simply makes up whatever evidence he wants.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: baptist; belongsinreligion; blogspam; catholic; christian; corruption; creation; crevolist; dna; evangelical; evolution; genes; genetics; genome; godsgravesglyphs; intelligentdesign; judaism; lutheran; moralabsolutes; notasciencetopic; paleontology; propellerbeanie; protestant; science; spammer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last
To: GodGunsGuts
No they were not, they ate themselves out of house and home, took about 30,000 years.
21 posted on 12/01/2009 7:19:43 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: metmom

I’d love to have an 18 winged dragonfly for a pet. Maybe someday they’ll discover an artist’s conception of one sealed in tree sap, and using that and the magic that is evolution we can all wish hard enough and it will pop back into existence. Just like every other amazing creature on Earth did.


22 posted on 12/01/2009 7:20:30 PM PST by Spike Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Well seeing how it is being billed as “the best book ever written on the subject”, I would not be surprised if it is required reading in many college and university classes already.


23 posted on 12/01/2009 7:22:05 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek; GodGunsGuts

You would be interested in considering actually commenting on the article instead of starting off on a personal attack on GGG, would you?

Like, what do you think about the guy making up stuff like 18 winged dragonflies to posit his theory?

Or why evos would suggest the existence of a four winged fruit fly as an ancestor to the two winged one with nothing to support it? And why, if the two winged one works so well, the four winged one evolved in the first place?


24 posted on 12/01/2009 7:22:55 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

So you mean to tell me the scientists were wrong for the past oh, 100 years? Because I’m pretty sure it was pushed as the gospel that the dinosaurs were wiped out by some cataclysmic event.

Wow...untold eons to accidentally develop all that you are, and then you die out in what amounts to a blink of an eye in geological terms. Evolution pretty stupid for a genius.


25 posted on 12/01/2009 7:24:27 PM PST by Spike Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

All your picture seem to be some form of intelligent design. Or were they once Volkswagen bugs that became flying machines?


26 posted on 12/01/2009 7:25:00 PM PST by guitarplayer1953 (Romak 7.62X54MM, AK47 7.62X39MM, LARGO 9X23MM, HAPINESS IS A WARM GUN BANG BANG YEA YEA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Spike Knotts

I, on the other hand...am just stupid for a person of average intelligence.

Should have read...Evolution is pretty stupid for a genius...


27 posted on 12/01/2009 7:26:06 PM PST by Spike Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

You seem awfully confident about the dinos going extinct as a result of starvation. On what basis do you conclude that this is a historical fact?


28 posted on 12/01/2009 7:26:42 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

It’s Dino Week on The Discovery Channel.


29 posted on 12/01/2009 7:29:47 PM PST by Spike Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Spike Knotts

Ah, there is nothing quite like Discovery Channel just-so storytelling!


30 posted on 12/01/2009 7:31:46 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Hit and run. Happens all the time.


31 posted on 12/01/2009 7:32:38 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
Did I use the word starvation. NO !! Most animal will die of disease long before they starve to death. Malnutrition leads to disease.
32 posted on 12/01/2009 7:42:45 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Ok, so on what basis are you concluding that the extinction of the dinos by malnutrition and disease is an historical fact?


33 posted on 12/01/2009 7:46:36 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Not your teacher!!!


34 posted on 12/01/2009 7:47:54 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat; GodGunsGuts

Fer cryin’ out loud! Can’t an evo ever answer a simple question?!?!?!


35 posted on 12/01/2009 7:49:20 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: metmom; org.whodat; GodGunsGuts

This is literally the most retarded exchange involving evolution I think I’ve ever seen. “Not your teacher” indeed.

I truly believe that the rank and file who believe in evolution do so because they’re too dimwitted to grasp the wonderful engineering and seemingly impossible variety of life.


36 posted on 12/01/2009 7:52:05 PM PST by Spike Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Obviously not! But I’m not asking you to teach, I’m asking you to justify your blanket statement that the dinos went extinct as a result of starvation and disease.


37 posted on 12/01/2009 7:56:01 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Stop the childish name calling stupid. What in hell is an EVO anyway: When you finish these get back to me; http://web.me.com/dinoruss/publications.html


38 posted on 12/01/2009 7:56:33 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Stop the childish name calling stupid. What in hell is an EVO anyway: When you finish these get back to me; http://web.me.com/dinoruss/publications.html


39 posted on 12/01/2009 7:56:38 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Spike Knotts
I don't think it's necessarily dimwittedness...I think they are committed to a nature-religioun that has made the universe its god (and darwin its randomly selected messenger).
40 posted on 12/01/2009 8:01:58 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson