Skip to comments.Cook v Good - APPEAL- 11th Circuit Docket Dismissed
Posted on 12/01/2009 7:49:11 PM PST by mountainbunny
US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Page 1 of 6
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
56 Forsyth Street, N.W. Atlanta, GA 30303-2289 (404) 335-6100
09-14698-CC Stefan Frederick Cook v. Wanda L. Good
According to this, it looks like Cook v. Good was dismissed a few days ago because the plaintiff's attorney, failed to file in a timely manner. If I'm wrong, please correct me.
From the file: Orly Taitz Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-2(c), this appeal is dismissed for 11/24/2009 want of prosecution because the appellant failed to file brief and record excerpts within the time fixed by the rules.
Orly screwed up? Imagine that...
Orly Taitz, ball dropper extraordinaire.
The whole thing is utterly bizarre.
This is one of the cases that Judge Land was involved in. He fined her $20,000.00 in one case, and and she drops the other one.
She "cares" enough to get herself fined 20 large, but not enough to make a simple deadline?
With everything Orly has going on right now, getting her clients' appeals filed on time is probably at the bottom of her "to do" list.
What else is there? I ask this in all seriousness.
What were all the court cases for if they are suddenly not important enough to file a sheet of paper or two?
Well, that $20K seems to have stung a bit. She's actually hired a real attorney to help with her appeal. And she's involved in some mortgage scam with her disbarred former partner, Charles Lincoln III that looks like it's about to get ugly. Not to mention potential sanctions from the California bar. She's got a lot of "not good" on her plate right now.
And the DOJ is fighting her every step of the way with our tax money.
When you bring a lawsuit demanding the President resign or be removed from office (Orly doesn't care about his birth certificate) you can expect a defense. Though, to be fair, Obama has only offered a defense in three of the 60+ (and counting) eligibility lawsuits, and these defense have consisted of nothing more than routine Motions to Dismiss which were all granted. The rest have been laughed out of court with Obama needing to provide no defense whatsoever.
A "loser pays" tort reform could alleviate some of this burden to the taxpayers.
The fact remains, and you cannot refute it, is that Obama is hiding everything important about his past. How do you defend that when releasing it would validate his eligibility, or would it shatter your false image of him and force you to question your judgment? If you are not afraid of the truth, check out www.newsmax.com/printTemplate.html Written by Kenneth Timmerman, Wed. Sept. 3, 2008. NOTICE it was 2008. Check out colony14.com for Obama Timeline with references.
Ping to Orly Taitz whack-a-mole thread. Case dismissed for failure to file on time.
The Party is Cook, not Orly. Maybe he didn’t want to go ahead after the Government took his job? I could understand that.
Where is the outrage Freepers?
I would love to see Obama's various records released, although only one of them (the birth certificate) relates to his eligibility. But getting that done is a political goal to be pursued through the political process; trying to get the courts to remove a sitting President is a fool's errand.
I could understand if that was the case. Still, assuming you are correct, doesn't it make sense to take a moment or two and file a motion to dismiss without prejudice? That way, if the plaintiff ever wanted to re-file, he could. Even asking that it be dismissed with prejudice makes sense, if he felt that he never wanted to mess with it ever again.
Does it make sense to just drop it and let the court take charge?
As an aside: On her Facebook page, which it looks like she last updated Tuesday @ 18:47 with a reply to someone, directly under her name she has a blurb which states she has two active cases, the first being Cook.
Appeal in Major Cooks case, seeking damages for retaliation and wrongful termination under pressure of the Obama regime
Posted on | October 6, 2009
U.S. District Court [LIVE AREA]
Georgia Middle District
Notice of Electronic Filing
The following transaction was entered on 10/6/2009 at 9:51 AM EDT and filed on 10/6/2009
Case Name: Cook v. Good et al
Case Number: 4:09-cv-82
WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 07/16/2009
Document Number: 15
USCA Case Number 09-14698C re  Notice of Appeal, filed by Stefan Frederick Cook. (tls)
4:09-cv-82 Notice has been electronically mailed to:
I’m sorry; I’m not sure what I’m looking at there. Is she saying that she’s filed in the case already and that the court is saying she hasn’t?
Don’t know what it means. I expect it will become clear.
Orly isn’t going to pay Judge Lands fine without a hearing so we haven’t heard the end of it.
His college applications, passport, citizenship papers, Columbia records and thesis, all social security numbers, overseas places visited, Saudi officials helping him, etc. can validate his eligibility, or? Obama is a fraud who has conned Dems and the naive to vote for someone they know nothing about to further Communism (think Progressivism) or as a reaction to Bush, or because of racism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.