I looked several times & didn't find this posted.
According to this, it looks like Cook v. Good was dismissed a few days ago because the plaintiff's attorney, failed to file in a timely manner. If I'm wrong, please correct me.
From the file: Orly Taitz Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-2(c), this appeal is dismissed for 11/24/2009 want of prosecution because the appellant failed to file brief and record excerpts within the time fixed by the rules.
To: mountainbunny
it looks like Cook v. Good was dismissed a few days ago because the plaintiff's attorney, failed to file in a timely manner. Orly screwed up? Imagine that...
2 posted on
12/01/2009 8:15:40 PM PST by
Drew68
To: mountainbunny
Orly Taitz, ball dropper extraordinaire.
3 posted on
12/01/2009 8:21:25 PM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America.)
To: BuckeyeTexan
7 posted on
12/01/2009 8:51:43 PM PST by
Drew68
To: mountainbunny
The Party is Cook, not Orly. Maybe he didn’t want to go ahead after the Government took his job? I could understand that.
Where is the outrage Freepers?
13 posted on
12/02/2009 9:27:45 PM PST by
plenipotentiary
(Obama was a BRITISH SUBJECT at birth, passed to him via Pops, can't be NBC)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson