I disagree. He did what he had to do to save the economy of Mississippi.
I'm really sick of this no-one-is-conservative-enough crap.
posted on 12/02/2009 12:24:05 PM PST
(Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
I disagree. He did what he had to do to save the economy of Mississippi. I'm really sick of this no-one-is-conservative-enough crap.
Seriously? One land deal for cronies did NOT save the Mississippi economy. Give the good folks there a bit more credit (including many members of my family). His deal exhibits a fundamental flaw in his philosophy that can manifest itself in many ways. When someone believes that it is OK to take property from individuals at the point of a gun, they aren't fit to be president or governor. That is an example of statist thinking and is unacceptable.
posted on 12/02/2009 12:38:53 PM PST
(Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
I know people who were in the meetings where this was debated and it was for some time. It was a damned if you do damned if you don't call and Haley agonized over it and in the end made the best call.
And I say that as a land owner who may well come under this law with several of my properties.
To say it was simply for tax revenue is exceedingly ignorant.
Was Bush conservative enough for you?
posted on 12/02/2009 2:25:06 PM PST
by genetic homophobe
(They hate Sarah because she lovingly carries a failed abortion on her hip.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson