Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lord Moncktonís summary of Climategate and its issues
Watts Up With That? ^ | November 30, 2009 | by Christopher Monckton of Brenchley

Posted on 12/02/2009 12:40:01 PM PST by Forgiven_Sinner

Both Steve McIntyre and I are mentioned in this comprehensive summary. I’ve posted some excerpts below, with a link to the full report in PDF form. It is well worth a read. – Anthony

Cold facts about the hot topic of global temperature change after the Climategate scandal

THE WHISTLE BLOWS FOR TRUTH The whistleblower deep in the basement of one of the ugly, modern tower-blocks of the dismal, windswept University of East Anglia could scarcely have timed it better. In less than three weeks, the world’s governing class – its classe politique – would meet in Copenhagen, Denmark, to discuss a treaty to inflict an unelected and tyrannical global government on us, with vast and unprecedented powers to control all once-free world markets and to tax and regulate the world’s wealthier nations for its own enrichment: in short, to bring freedom, democracy, and prosperity to an instant end worldwide, at the stroke of a pen, on the pretext of addressing what is now known to be the non-problem of manmade “global warming”.

The unnamed hero of ‘Climategate’, after months of work gathering emails, computer code, and data, quietly sent a 61-megabyte compressed file from one of the university’s servers to an obscure public message-board on the internet, with a short covering note to the effect that the climate was too important to keep the material secret, and that the data from the University would be available for a short time only. He had caught the world’s politico-scientific establishment green-handed. Yet his first attempts to reveal the highly-profitable fraud and systematic corruption at the very heart of the UN’s climate panel and among the scientists most prominent in influencing it’s prejudiced and absurdly doom-laden reports had failed. He had made the mistake of sending the data-file to the mainstream news media, which had also profited for decades by fostering the “global warming” scare, and by generally denying anyone who disagreed with the official viewpoint any platform.

The whistleblower’s data file revealed, for the first time, the innermost workings of the tiny international clique of climate scientists, centered on the Climate Research Unit at East Anglia, that has been the prime mover in telling the world that it is warming at an unprecedented rate, and that humankind is responsible.

REVEALED: THE ABJECT CORRUPTION OF CLIMATE SCIENCE The gallant whistleblower now faces a police investigation at the instigation of the University authorities desperate to look after their own and to divert allegations of criminality elsewhere. His crime? He had revealed what many had long suspected:

- A tiny clique of politicized scientists, paid by unscientific politicians with whom they were financially and politically linked, were responsible for gathering and reporting data on temperatures from the palaeoclimate to today’s climate. The “Team”, as they called themselves, were bending and distorting scientific data to fit a nakedly political story-line profitable to themselves and congenial to the governments that, these days, pay the bills for 99% of all scientific research.

The Climate Research Unit at East Anglia had profited to the tune of at least $20 million in “research” grants from the Team’s activities. The Team had tampered with the complex, bureaucratic processes of the UN’s climate panel, the IPCC, so as to exclude inconvenient scientific results from its four Assessment Reports, and to influence the panel’s conclusions for political rather than scientific reasons. The Team had conspired in an attempt to redefine what is and is not peer-reviewed science for the sake of excluding results that did not fit what they and the politicians with whom they were closely linked wanted the UN’s climate panel to report. They had tampered with their own data so as to conceal inconsistencies and errors. They had emailed one another about using a “trick” for the sake of concealing a “decline” in temperatures in the paleoclimate. They had expressed dismay at the fact that, contrary to all of their predictions, global temperatures had not risen in any statistically-significant sense for 15 years, and had been falling for nine years. They had admitted that their inability to explain it was “a travesty”. This internal doubt was in contrast to their public statements that the present decade is the warmest ever, and that “global warming” science is settled. They had interfered with the process of peer-review itself by leaning on journals to get their friends rather than independent scientists to review their papers. They had successfully leaned on friendly journal editors to reject papers reporting results inconsistent with their political viewpoint. They had campaigned for the removal of a learned journal’s editor, solely because he did not share their willingness to debase and corrupt science for political purposes. They had mounted a venomous public campaign of disinformation and denigration of their scientific opponents via a website that they had expensively created. Contrary to all the rules of open, verifiable science, the Team had committed the criminal offense of conspiracy to conceal and then to destroy computer codes and data that had been legitimately requested by an external researcher who had very good reason to doubt that their “research” was either honest or competent. THE NATURE ‘TRICK’ TO ‘HIDE THE DECLINE’ IN TEMPERATURES Among the most revealing of the emails released to the world by the whistleblower was one dated November 1999. In that email, Professor “Phil” Jones of the CRU wrote to Michael Mann, Raymond Bradley and Malcolm Hughes, the authors of the infamous “hockey stick” graph that falsely abolished the medieval warm period: Almost immediately after the news of Climategate broke, Professor Jones told Investigative Magazine’s TGIF Edition that he “had no idea” what he might have meant by the words “hide the decline”. He said:

“They’re talking about the instrumental data which is unaltered – but they’re talking about proxy data going further back in time, a thousand years, and it’s just about how you add on the last few years, because when you get proxy data you sample things like tree rings and ice cores, and they don’t always have the last few years. So one way is to add on the instrumental data for the last few years.”

A few hours later, the science hate-crime website created by the Team cobbled together a jumbled, snivelingly self-serving, and entirely different pretext:

“The paper in question is the Mann, Bradley and Hughes (1998) Nature paper on the original multiproxy temperature reconstruction [the ‘hockey-stick’ graph of pre-instrumental temperatures over the past 1000 years in the Northern Hemisphere], and the ‘trick’ is just to plot the instrumental records along with reconstruction so that the context of the recent warming is clear. Scientists often use the term “trick” to refer to “a good way to deal with a problem”, rather than something that is “secret”, and so there is nothing problematic in this at all. As for the ‘decline’, it is well known that Keith Briffa’s [another prominent member of the Team] maximum latewood tree ring density proxy diverges from the temperature records after 1960 (this is more commonly known as the “divergence problem” … and has been discussed in the literature since Briffa et al. in Nature in 1998 (Nature, 391, 678-682). Those authors have always recommend not using the post-1960 part of their reconstruction, and so, while ‘hiding’ is probably a poor choice of words (since it is ‘hidden’ in plain sight), not using the data in the plot is completely appropriate, as is further research to understand why this happens.”

Enter Steve McIntyre, the one who had first realized that the UN’s climate panel in 2001 had used a corrupt graph that had falsely abolished the medieval warm period with the aim of pretending that today’s global temperatures are unprecedented in at least 1000 years. Later that day his website,, revealed the truth about the conspirators’ “trick”. In order to smooth a data series over a given time period, one must pad it with artificial data beyond the endpoint of the real series. However, when Mann, Bradley, and Hughes plotted instrumental data against their reconstructions based on the varying widths of tree-rings from ancient trees, their favourite form of proxy or pre-instrumental reconstructed temperature, no smoothing method could conceal the fact that after 1960 the tree-ring data series trended downward, while the instrumental series trended upward. This was the Team’s “divergence”:

“So Mann’s solution [‘Mike’s Nature trick’] was to use the instrumental record for padding [both the proxy and the instrumental data series], which changes the smoothed series to point upwards.”

Accordingly, though the author of the original email had said that the “trick” was to add instrumental measurements for years beyond available proxy data, his conspirators at the science-hate website admitted it was actually a replacement of proxy data owing to a known but unexplained post-1960 “divergence” between the proxy data and the instrumental data. In fact, it was a fabrication. The next day, in a statement issued by the University of East Anglia’s press office, Professor Jones fumblingly tried to recover the position:

“The word ‘trick’ was used here colloquially as in a clever thing to do. It is ludicrous to suggest that it refers to anything untoward.”

As we shall see, Professor Jones was not telling the truth. BREAKING THE BROKEN CODE: DISSECTING THE DODGY DATA The “Documents” folder in the enormous data-file released by the whistleblower contains many segments of computer program code used by Jones and the Team in contriving the Climate Research Unit’s global temperature series. The data-file also contained a 15,000-line commentary by programmers concerned that the code and the data used by the Team were suspect, were fabricated, and were not fit for their purpose. Looking at the seldom-tidy code, the sheer number of programs which subject the raw data to various degrees of filtering, processing, and tampering is disconcerting. Some of these alterations were blatant and unacceptable, notably those which removed proxy data that correlate poorly with measured regional temperature, or even replaced proxy data altogether with measured data to conceal a discrepancy between what the proxy data actually showed and what the Team wanted it to show.

The Team’s programmers even admitted, in comments within the code, that they were artificially adjusting or “correcting” the proxy data from tree-rings. In Fortran, the high-level computer language long in use at universities for programming, a programmer’s comment is usually preceded by the statement “REM” for “remark”, indicating that the text on the line following the word “REM” should be ignored by the compiler program that translates the Fortran code that humans can understand into executable machine language that the computer can understand. One of the commonest remarks included in the program fragments disclosed by the whistleblower is as follows:

“These will be artificially adjusted to look closer to the real temperatures.”

There could scarcely be a plainer admission that the data are being regularly, routinely, materially tampered with, for the sake of making it appear that the proxy data are sufficiently reliable to appear close to the instrumental temperatures. This is no mere debating point. The UN’s climate panel had issued specific warnings against using proxy data (MXD) from tree-rings, because warmer weather is not the only reason why tree-rings become wider in some years than in others. There are at least two other prominent reasons, both of which can – and do – distort the tree-ring data beyond the point where they are useful as indicators of (or proxies for) pre-instrumental temperatures. First, the tree-rings become wider whenever the weather becomes wetter. Secondly, and of still greater concern, the tree-rings widen when there is more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. And there is 40% more CO2 in the atmosphere today than there was in 1750.

Yet, as McIntyre and McKitrick had established originally in 2003, and had published in a leading journal in 2005, the majority of the data on the basis of which Mann, Bradley and Hughes, and later other members of the Team, had attempted to pretend that there had been no medieval warm period were tree-ring series. Take out the suspect tree-ring series, together with just one other rogue series, and all the remaining data series establish beyond reasonable doubt that the Middle Ages were truly, materially, and globally warmer than the present.

Scientists with programming knowledge have already begun to examine the computer code that Professor Jones and his colleagues had attempted to hide for so long. Here is Marc Sheppard’s selection of three examples of the tortuous sequences of deliberate data tampering that are evident within the program code.

Read the complete report from SPPI here:

TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1750; 199911; 2001; agw; bradley; briffa; christophermonckton; climateauditorg; climategate; climateresearchunit; climatesummit; co2; copenhagen; cru; cruea; cultureofcorruption; eastanglia; emails; enmark; fortran; fudge; globaltax; globalwarminghoax; globalwarmingscandal; harryreadme; hidethedecline; hockeystick; hughes; ipcc; keithbriffa; lordmonckton; malcolmhughes; mann; marcsheppard; mcintyre; mediablackout; medievalwarmperiod; michaelmann; mikesnaturetrick; monckton; movealong; mxd; nothingtoseehere; peerreview; philjones; raymondbradley; sheppard; stchristopher; stevemcintyre; theteam; tobintax; treeringcircus; treerings; trick; uofeastanglia; warming
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
This summary covers the issues and the crimes committed by the AGW fanatics.
1 posted on 12/02/2009 12:40:04 PM PST by Forgiven_Sinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner; Thunder90; Little Bill; Nervous Tick; 4horses+amule; Desdemona; Fractal Trader; ...

Beam me to Planet Gore !

2 posted on 12/02/2009 12:40:59 PM PST by steelyourfaith (Time to prosecute Al Gore now that fellow scam artist Bernie Madoff is in stir.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner

Big media is still ducking this. For how much longer can they not see what’s under their noses?

The MSM is totally in the tank.

3 posted on 12/02/2009 12:42:19 PM PST by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner

Here’s where you can digg the article:

Raise this story’s profile!

4 posted on 12/02/2009 12:46:05 PM PST by Forgiven_Sinner (For God so loved the world, that He gave His only Son that whosoever believes in Him should not die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjo
For how much longer can they not see what’s under their noses?

Oh they see it all right. BUT they must never ever report anything that makes DEAR READER look bad. The man-child supports all this green global warming crap, and wants a cap and tax bill so he can redistribute wealth in the US, just like he wants to sign on to the Copenhagen treaty so he can redistribute US Wealth to the turd-world countries. America has been evil and plundered the planet. /sarc
5 posted on 12/02/2009 12:47:52 PM PST by Cheerio (Barack Hussein 0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner

Everyone associated with this bs agw scam should be prosecuted to the fullest extent. al gore “LIED TO US... HE PLAYED ON OUR FEARS”!


6 posted on 12/02/2009 12:50:48 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (hussama will never be my president... NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner; All
"Raise this story’s profile!

It's Dugg!

And the rest of Brits are catching on to this: CLIMATE CHANGE 'FRAUD'

But their politicians and ours just keep humming the "Global Warming/Greenergy" tune as though nothing has changed.

7 posted on 12/02/2009 1:11:40 PM PST by Bokababe (Save Christian Kosovo!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner

Amazing. This is the first nuts and bolts description I’ve read of how the corrupt methodology was carried out. Thanks.

8 posted on 12/02/2009 1:11:46 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner


a must read for anyone wanting to understand the great boondoggle.

9 posted on 12/02/2009 1:18:40 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner

Bump for later, I heard the appeals he made in recent months about Hopenhagen 2009.

10 posted on 12/02/2009 1:52:37 PM PST by a fool in paradise (Question authority!Who is the University of East Anglia to drive the 'Global Climate Change' agenda?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio; awake-n-angry
The Global Bankers see this Carbon Credits as a nice way to replace the game played with subprime mortgages....

It is very BIG MONEY!

11 posted on 12/02/2009 1:52:42 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

“Global Banker” is by far the most overblown title for a thieving criminal POS these old ears have ever heard.

....even if they do their stealing on such a grand scale.

12 posted on 12/02/2009 2:13:59 PM PST by Unrepentant VN Vet (Senator, just how much did you steal from my grandkids for that last vote?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner

bump for home

13 posted on 12/02/2009 2:22:02 PM PST by Walmartian (Wally "Angelo" Martian. A made man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
Well there is more....from a very nice website down under:

Sub-prime carbon is coming


Behind the scenes, large financial houses are moving in stealthily. In 2008, carbon trading worldwide reached $126 billion and is projected to grow to become a $2-$10 trillion dollar market, or “The largest commodity traded world wide”. The largest. That’s bigger than oil, coal, gas, or iron.

Banks want us to trade carbon

JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, BNP Paribas, Barclays, Deutsche Bank, Citigroup, Credit Suisse are just a few financial houses calling for emissions trading schemes. (None of them seem to be calling for a tax?) Those who broker the trades are guaranteed to make money.

Journalists who repeat IPCC press releases without investigation are unwittingly acting as unpaid agents for large financial players.

This “free market” is not free, and is not based on a commodity, but on unverifiable, unauditable permits for actions that depend on “motivations”. They are issued to companies to build clean factories they would otherwise not have built (who can tell?). The top two auditors in Europe have both been suspended in the last 12 months. Carbon permits have no value other than by government decree. It’s another fiat currency to be exploited by financial institutions.

Bankers benefit — you pay

The potential for fraud and corruption is limited only by what the voting public will put up with (and what they are aware of). Once this legislation is in place it will be impossible to unwind without major compensation claims. Big bankers win either way.

It sucks wealth from those who produce real goods.

* Gun? What gun? Try not paying your carbon taxes and say “hello” to four grey walls.

Sources: Carbon Trading, World Bank Report.

Predictions: Commodities and Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) USA.

14 posted on 12/02/2009 2:38:05 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Unrepentant VN Vet

See #14.

15 posted on 12/02/2009 2:38:31 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner; backhoe

You need this one.

16 posted on 12/02/2009 2:40:59 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

“Amazing. This is the first nuts and bolts description I’ve read of how the corrupt methodology was carried out. Thanks.”

I have a group of conservative diggers I follow and I get a lot of good articles from them. Then I read FR daily and get a lot of good articles from here. So I cross pollinate the two sites. This one came from digg.

17 posted on 12/02/2009 2:42:26 PM PST by Forgiven_Sinner (For God so loved the world, that He gave His only Son that whosoever believes in Him should not die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner
The full PDF version of the report, which is linked to at the source, ends with a nice quote from Eisenhower's Farewell Address. However accuracy should require, especially in THIS report, pointing out Ike was misquoted. Basically Ike used the two sentences cited in the reverse order.

The full report otherwise appears to be very well done, although I don't know enough to rule out other minor glitches. Real peer review of the open source type is called for. I especially like its recommendations, starting with "What is to be done?" on pages 38-40. Those involved should be removed forever from all involvement in "science" and all public financed activities as being unfit of any use of the public trust or the public purse. They should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. And I would add, in an age where governments around the world are complaining of running out of funds, that not only are there substantial savings available in the canceling of scheduled and possible future spending on "green" matters, but there is a very large body of past "green" expenditures, fraudulently obtained, at least some of which may be recoverable via legal proceedings. By comparison Madoff was a piker. Go after those who Gore'd the world with the same zeal.

18 posted on 12/02/2009 2:50:02 PM PST by JohnBovenmyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner

Spreading wide and far! (This article, that is.)

19 posted on 12/02/2009 3:04:30 PM PST by Doomonyou (Let them eat Lead. Bonus tag line: FAIL 246, Obama 0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnBovenmyer

“The full PDF version of the report, which is linked to at the source, ends with a nice quote from Eisenhower’s Farewell Address. However accuracy should require, especially in THIS report, pointing out Ike was misquoted. Basically Ike used the two sentences cited in the reverse order.”

So the correct quote should be:

“The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present – and is gravely to be regarded.
. . . Public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite ... ”

Thanks for catching that! You made me look at the pdf file, which I had previously downloaded. Seems even more complete and condemning than this summary.

20 posted on 12/02/2009 3:07:41 PM PST by Forgiven_Sinner (For God so loved the world, that He gave His only Son that whosoever believes in Him should not die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson