Skip to comments.Official Request byCongressmen to See Obama's Birth Certificate-Straw Which Breaks This Camel's Back
Posted on 12/04/2009 4:47:27 PM PST by cycle of discernment
OFFICIAL REQUEST BY CONGRESSMEN TO SEE OBAMAS BIRTH CERTIFICATE WILL BE THE STRAW WHICH BREAKS THIS CAMELS BACK
Political analysis by John Charlton
Obama's presidential campaign was hailed for its forceful imagery, but after 11 months the public has come to understand the undisputed facts about him, don't fit the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.
(Dec. 4, 2009) Georgias representative in the U.S. House, Nathan Deal announced in early November that he and 10 House colleagues were going to sign a joint letter, asking Obama to publicly reveal his birth certificate,.
The simple enough question was rebuffed and ridiculed by the Main Stream Media, and even the Savannah Morning News, as if a birth certificate was some sort of private journal or diary of past affairs.
The mere fact that the liberals and progressives ridiculed Nathan Deal whose only interest is to quiet the nation shows that they have no substantive reason to oppose the request. It further shows that they know that Obama cannot oblige Deal and his co-signatories, for in Democratic circles nothing is a secret.
What will Obama say to Nathan Deal? The answer must come soon. Deal said that he was to send his letter after Thanksgiving. Any delay on the part of Barack Hussein Obama to oblige Deal, will only further erode his political influence in Washington, D.C..
Obama has been effectively checkmated by the concerted effort of public support, publicized lawsuits on the eligibility question, publicity campaigns such as those of World Net Daily and Charles Kerchner to put the issue in the face of liberals on a constant basis, and blogs and bloggers the world over.
If Obama obliges him, then the online image of a Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) provided by his campaign will be proven a forgery, according to the consensus of opinion of citizens who have studied the images posted on the net and found some images of the allegedly same document, contain a HI State seal and some do not.
If Obama does refuses, however, it will only further confirm that he has something to hide.
Palins remark that it is a valid issue and Ogdens resignation as Deputy U.S. Attorney General in the same week, following the sending of Nathan Deals letter, appear to be diagnostic signs that the political establishment understands the risks and imminent crisis about to break. The publicity garnered by the testimony of the U.S. Marine, who goes by the nik, Race Bannon, only further tilt the Obama regime towards political implosion.
Even the pulse of Obamas political support on the net tells the tale: a lull and quiet among them posting comments at opposition blogs is noticeable. There remain only the violent, the perverse and the somewhat mad to carry on the cheers of Change, which were the mind numbing drum beat of the Obama for American campaign, just 14 months ago.
The political momentum of the nation now follows diverse roads to the same destination, and the resulting fireworks are going to be much brighter and invigorating than those of any Fourth of July in many a year!
It does me, too.... I just don't think that if he finally does produce a legitimate BC, the only people it will hurt will be the ones who are making such a fuss about it.
Under the law in 1961, merely being born in Hawaii is not enough if the father is a foreign national able to confer citizenship of his home country, and the mother has not lived in the US long enough past the age of majority to confer US citizenship.
If the appropriate statute is applied, (that in effect at the time of his birth), the COLB would be prima facie evidence he is not a Natural Born Citizen, which is the Constitutional requirement.
The anchor baby concept did not come until later.
In addition, if he was made citizen of Indonesia while his mother was married to Soetoro, he might choose to become an American Citizen later, but that would not fulfil the Natural Born Citizen requirement, either.
Furthermore, and the reason for wanting to see his admissions records, he may have applied as a foreign (Indonesian) student in order to take advantage of programs offered for college admission.
Again, the pertinent documents are missing or have not been produced.
Keep in mind that passport records which may have indicated that Obama had claimed other than US citizenship may have been compromised, and that the person suspected of (illegally) researching them was found murdered.
The entire situation promotes more questions than answers, the answers could be readily made available by a specific individual who ran for office on "Transparency", as well as "Hope and Change", but those documents which could dispel the doubts have not been forthcoming?
Really, while most of us follow the issue, it is only a very small fraction of our day. We don't spend our time cripplingly obscessed with it, we follow other issues, work, play, have time with our families, but understand fully that this country is only headed deeper into a Constitutional crisis with every Socialist policy, every grant, every disbursement of taxpayer money, every dime of deficit which may have been signed off on by someone who cannot legally hold the office.
If you do not want to know what, despite the horrible consequences most of us forsee, is legal and legitimate policy out there (albeit deeply flawed) and what is, in effect, Constitutionally void, then you apparently either do not understand the scope of the potential crisis, or do not care.
Don't forget the ACORNs dropping...and unaccounted for stimulus funds...
LOL - only Marines have the guts to go where Angels (& mere mortals) fear to tread, heheh.
This all leads to the question of how can Obama be an Article II natural born Citizen if he was at birth both a U.S. citizen (assuming he was born in the U.S.) and a British citizen which alone disqualifies him from having that status? But to make matters worse, Obama continues to be a British citizen at a time that he is currently the President of the United States. Can we reasonably conclude that the Founding Fathers, who had just fought a war with Great Britain and who did not want a foreigner to occupy the Office of President, would have allowed a British citizen born after 1789, who carries that status not only from birth but also to the time he occupies the Office, to be President of the United States and Commander in Chief of its Military? Another question is how can a would-be President and Commander in Chief of the Military with current dual citizenship obtain a security clearance which he should have to access classified U.S. government information needed by him to carry out the sensitive functions of that Office?
Is your time of professed "silence" up now and will the Aporn cash checks resume again??
See post # 165 that answers all your faked previous posts!!!
The pests have called up!!!
Kinda late for that, isn't it. Besides, it was probably pretty gross.
See post # 165, that is what is relevant!!!
That is what he ALWAYS does!!!
You have been outed as usual to call up your defense squad to shield you and disrupt, orders from APORN or the W.H basement!!!
So WHY don't you just leave us alone and go back to your lib friends and be more productive there, we won't stop you from leaving us!!!
Define "troll" and your ability to make that determination.
You singlehandedly take idiocy to new and impressive levels.
Give yourself a cookie.
It takes you a little while to catch up, doesn’t it? Welcome aboard.
Why are you suddenly changing subject on this thread???
That is a “start” for Mark, maybe he thinks he better be on Sarah’s team than continued to be silenced by the upper crust at Clear Channel/Premier???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.