Even for a home birth a birth certificate is supposed to be filed. It obviously won't have a doctor's signature or name, nor a hospital registrar's. You don't have to bring the baby in for "inspection" either. In 1961, you probably did not need any supporting documentation, other than one witness' signature and the signature of the person providing the other information, usually the mother, but not necessarily. Grandma Tut could have filed it, forging Stanley Ann's signature, even if the birth was in Canada, Kenya, or Equatorial Guinea.
But if that were the case, the long form would show Grandma's signature and would indicate a home birth, and show the supposed address of the home.
But as long as it shows "Barack Hussein Obama" as the father, it would show that BHO Jr is not eligible to the office of President.
PLUS, how is claiming a home birth a ‘way out’ if he has been lying all along about this so called BC ?
It would mean he was lying and showing a fraudulent doc that implied hospital birth...that is no ‘way out’.
It would further incriminate him.
“Even for a home birth a birth certificate is supposed to be filed.”
That is interesting.
I assumed that with a home birth, he would get a COLB, like the probably bogus one that he presented.
What is your opinion? Where was he born?
WHEN was he born?