Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: El Sordo

“So what if that is released and contains no irregularities?
Then what?”

Well, Duhhhh.
The issue will go away, but it will be harmful to
Obammie for thumbing his nose for so long.

My contention has always been:
1. He does not have a BC, because he was born outside of a hospital, or, he was NOT born in Hawaii.
2. He has one, but it contains embarrassing information, such as father’s name.
His best out is to say that it was a home birth.

The whole issue is very strange, but I am leaning on the
side of those that believe he is NOT a US citizen.


77 posted on 12/04/2009 6:01:10 PM PST by AlexW (Now in the Philippines . Happy not to be back in the USA for now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: AlexW
My contention has always been:
1. He does not have a BC, because he was born outside of a hospital, or, he was NOT born in Hawaii.
2. He has one, but it contains embarrassing information, such as father’s name.

His best out is to say that it was a home birth.

Even for a home birth a birth certificate is supposed to be filed. It obviously won't have a doctor's signature or name, nor a hospital registrar's. You don't have to bring the baby in for "inspection" either. In 1961, you probably did not need any supporting documentation, other than one witness' signature and the signature of the person providing the other information, usually the mother, but not necessarily. Grandma Tut could have filed it, forging Stanley Ann's signature, even if the birth was in Canada, Kenya, or Equatorial Guinea.

But if that were the case, the long form would show Grandma's signature and would indicate a home birth, and show the supposed address of the home.

But as long as it shows "Barack Hussein Obama" as the father, it would show that BHO Jr is not eligible to the office of President.

134 posted on 12/04/2009 9:23:00 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: AlexW
His best out is to say that it was a home birth.

Too late for that. He made a big deal out of sending a public letter to the Kapolani (whatever) hospital right after inauguration. Seems like someone overcompensating.
140 posted on 12/05/2009 12:20:28 AM PST by F15Eagle (1 John 5:4-5, 4:15, John 11:25, 14:6, 1 Tim 2:5, John 3:17-18, John 20:31, 1 John 5:13, John 6:69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: AlexW

“The whole issue is very strange, but I am leaning on the
side of those that believe he is NOT a US citizen.”

It IS strange, to say the least. However, I believe the question being raised in the courts is: is he a ‘natural born citizen,’ and exactly what did the Framers mean by using that term in the Constitution. They didn’t say the POTUS has to be a citizen, as they did for Senators or Representatives; they said the POTUS has to be a ‘natural born citizen.’


229 posted on 12/05/2009 4:55:02 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson