“So what if that is released and contains no irregularities?
The issue will go away, but it will be harmful to
Obammie for thumbing his nose for so long.
My contention has always been:
1. He does not have a BC, because he was born outside of a hospital, or, he was NOT born in Hawaii.
2. He has one, but it contains embarrassing information, such as father’s name.
His best out is to say that it was a home birth.
The whole issue is very strange, but I am leaning on the
side of those that believe he is NOT a US citizen.
Even for a home birth a birth certificate is supposed to be filed. It obviously won't have a doctor's signature or name, nor a hospital registrar's. You don't have to bring the baby in for "inspection" either. In 1961, you probably did not need any supporting documentation, other than one witness' signature and the signature of the person providing the other information, usually the mother, but not necessarily. Grandma Tut could have filed it, forging Stanley Ann's signature, even if the birth was in Canada, Kenya, or Equatorial Guinea.
But if that were the case, the long form would show Grandma's signature and would indicate a home birth, and show the supposed address of the home.
But as long as it shows "Barack Hussein Obama" as the father, it would show that BHO Jr is not eligible to the office of President.
“The whole issue is very strange, but I am leaning on the
side of those that believe he is NOT a US citizen.”
It IS strange, to say the least. However, I believe the question being raised in the courts is: is he a ‘natural born citizen,’ and exactly what did the Framers mean by using that term in the Constitution. They didn’t say the POTUS has to be a citizen, as they did for Senators or Representatives; they said the POTUS has to be a ‘natural born citizen.’