Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AirTran 'hero' wasn't on plane, airline says
AJC.com - ATLANTA JOURNAL-CONSTITUTION ^ | ATLANTA BUSINESS NEWS 9:56 p.m. Friday, December 4, 2009 | By Alexis Stevens

Posted on 12/05/2009 2:56:13 AM PST by Cindy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Treeless Branch
Lastly, why would the two dudes not get back on the plane to reach their destination if this was a simple miscomunication?

Maybe that is the spin. They were not on the final flight.
21 posted on 12/05/2009 1:23:27 PM PST by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the occupation media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Androcles

He has been ordered by his employer, NASA, not to answer any questions.


22 posted on 12/05/2009 2:34:20 PM PST by SatinDoll (NO Foreign Nationals as our President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Treeless Branch
Are you telling me there was no one on the plane who could speak Spanish?

I'm not a lawyer but I am a writer and I also caught the ambiguous use of the word "believed" and understood that its use was part of a deliberate tact to mislead and deceive. And knowing that this was a flight headed to Texas, to the American Southwest, for cripes sake -- well, there's not a snowball's chance in hell that there weren't at least half a dozen Spanish-English bilingual folks on board. That ALONE told me that this AirTran and TSA account was manipulated partial-truth bullsh*t. The situation it implied (implied because of the phrase "believed it was Spanish") wasn't even remotely plausible. At least she could have said she "believed" they were speaking Balinese or Samoan or Swahili or some language where it would be believable that no one else on board could translate. I mean, come on!

Lastly, why would the two dudes not get back on the plane to reach their destination if this was a simple miscomunication?

Yep. The airline and TSA officials' claim that it was "a simple miscommunication" (whatever that is) is obviously bogus.

23 posted on 12/06/2009 6:32:27 PM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: buckalfa
Good post.

The truth will never be known ...

Probably not, but what's blatantly false IS known: it's false that Santa and his Reindeer towed the plane back to gate, and it's FALSE that a simple English-Spanish language barrier, or EVEN an Arab language-English barrier, was the crux of the problem. THOSE are truths we DO know.

The plane was headed for Texas; chances that it didn't have among its passengers several bilingual in English and Spanish are virtually nil. No matter WHAT the language -- if this was a group of more than a dozen travelling companions on a relatively small airplane where conversations and interactions could easily be observed even 15 seats away, it strains credulity to the breaking point to think that at least one among them wasn't proficient in English and the shared language among the travelling companions to translate.

This is NOT about the original email or about the Chaplain. It's about the obviously FALSE explanation that AirTrans and TSA are IMPLYING without actually saying. Some ugly and dangerous sh*t went down, probably related to Islamic terrorists (this WAS an act of terrorism because Americans were clearly terrorized), and officials are covering it up.

That is a truth we do know.

24 posted on 12/06/2009 6:47:42 PM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Finny
And knowing that this was a flight headed to Texas, to the American Southwest, for cripes sake -- well, there's not a snowball's chance in hell that there weren't at least half a dozen Spanish-English bilingual folks on board. That ALONE told me that this AirTran and TSA account was manipulated partial-truth bullsh*t.

Good point.

25 posted on 12/06/2009 7:01:58 PM PST by GOPJ (Climategate leaks? Taxpayers have a right to see tax funded research. Freeper dennisw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson