If people really understood where we are, they would make 1776 look like a picnic.
We cant let the MSM win this.
Best ClimateGate clips (show everybody you know):
It doesn’t matter.
It’s not about the climate.
It’s not about the truth.
It’s all about curtailing and controlling personal freedoms.
Barry will get what he wants: POWER
We can post articles all day long and march on capitals all day long and in the end they will get their way.
I heard some moron on talk radio last night(Lars I think) say we survived Carter and we will survive Barry.
This is different this time and the stakes are higher this time and the players are ruthless and global this time.
And most important is the majority of Americans are asleep and clueless and playing the useful idiot part to perfection.
And when they do wake up it will all be too late.
Sound pessimistic? Maybe.
In the end Barry and Nancy will get their cap and slave bill, health control bill, and card check. With those, it is all over and passing watered down versions just delays the full onslaught a few years.
Yes, this great country is dieing!!!
Oil for food and now this. You just can’t keep those UNpeople down.
Ha ha ha ha. How does it feel to be watching your career go down the loo?
Maybe later we'll see all of you who promoted AGW put on trial for crimes against humanity for wasting so much time and money that could better have been spent on clean water projects, successfully fighting malaria through DDT, or developing small automated nuclear energy plants for sub-Saharan energy needs so people don't have to breath toxic smoke from wood or charcoal or dung cooking fires instead of enriching governments with windfall taxes on energy to be spent on dirigist boondoggles while hobbling their own economies.
And what if, as is more likely than AGW, we go into another little ice age instead of just 2 or 3 decades of lower temperatures? All that money would have been wasted trying to control the uncontrollable. A colder climate is much worse for human health than a warmer one. Oh, wait, perhaps this is the motivation behind fighting global warmth. Environmentalists have pretty much uniformly been against anything that makes life better for humans since that would lead to greater levels of growth and prosperity and higher numbers of people.
Environmentalists from that nutcase Paul Ehrlich onwards have been warning about the danger to the earth from so many people and the necessity of paring down the number of humans to a "sustainable" level that is a tiny fraction of the current population. Maybe halting the CO2 increase (out of a mistaken notion that it actually has a warming effect) is a way of tipping things back to a colder, more unhealthy worldwide climate that will hurt agricultural production, increase deaths due to cold, and so damage a Western technological society that it will no longer be able to sustain a support of so high a global population with the end result being to cull the earth of its burden of what some refer to as its human disease.
So I can see, even in the face of the unpredicted-by-IPCC-climate-models global cool-down for the next two or three decades, that it would make sense, from Ehrlich's perspective, to use the energy taxation scheme as a way of multiplying the damage that the cold will do.
Have fun in the dock in the Hague.
This statement says to me that the author is not a serious scientist. Tree ring proxies are simply not accurate to 0.01 degrees. Writing a statement to that level of precision tells me he is uneducated in measurement accuracies.
I am sorry that the one caveat seems to be missing : that is, the most-used tree ring data, which chose 5 trees, out of over 40 (!) on which to base his conclusion, with the desired temperature trend.
This suppporting "evidence" plays a major role in the AGW "is a settled issue!"
The can of worms continues...