Posted on 12/07/2009 8:46:47 AM PST by NormsRevenge
I believe that I heard that the founder of Greenpeace was even forced out by the GreenReds.
The founder of the Weather Channel also speaks out against the Global Warming Scare. It is a fraudulent hysteria. Yet we are in “denial” if we challenge the scientific research.
KGB files show that there was a Soviet presence in America that served the interests of Stalin’s USSR but today we are told that it was nothing but a “Red Scare” and “hysteria”. I’ll point out that Orwell’s 1984 and Animal Farm were also products that came out of the so-called “Red Scare”. And they are still (mis)quoted today.
I don’t know if it IS the warmest decade. But mathematically, it can be the warmest even though it’s been cooling for 10 years, because you would be comparing it to other decades. If the 90s were cool up until the last couple of years, and then the temperature shot up, this decade could be warmer even though no year is warmer than the two hottest years of the 90s.
Of course, in real life the warmth is due to temperature sensors being located in heat sinks that are artificially getting hotter.
The State Department took such offense at the assertion that there were some Communist sympathizers within the State Department and our military. Any doubts now?
It is that same political correctness that allowed Nadil Hasan to stage his attack at Ft. Hood. While he set off several red flags, it would be wrong to question his patriotism to America.
Ah, I get it — the Decade of the 2000s was the warmest decade of the 2000s ever.
I don’t think we disagree, do we? I’m just more open minded to potential risks of CO2. I suspect that 20 years from now, we’ll all be wondering what all the fuss was about.
I reckon those emaciated figures represent what happens when the elites have bled the people of their energy and earnings.
Nope - no disagreement, just putting some numbers to the “low amounts of CO2” that you mentioned.
Global Warming will probably wind up next to witch trials on the inventory of once powerful and destructive social influences.
“Scientists” my ass. These fools have shown to be untrustworthy. They embarrass science and the scientific method. Political ideologues! Worthless saps! Hacks! If they didn’t have tenure they’d be begging on the street.”
There should have been an avalanche of criticism of this by scientists worldwide, but there`s barely been a whisper, which leads me to believe scientific fraud is far more rampant than these e-mails suggest, and that scientific fraud is perfectly acceptable,,,even to be admired. It`s time to give “scientists” the same respect given to used car salseman and shyster lawyers.
"Global warming" will get rid of Cuba??? Fire up the SUV!
Problem is if Cuba goes 6,000 ft so does Denver, as a Charger fan that isn’t that bad ‘cept for so goes San Diego, ooops I live in San Diego
As it happens, yes. The revival of English winemaking began in the 1950s and has been steadily improving in quality and quantity. In particular the methode champenoise sparkling whites have been winning international awards. I have three successful vineyards within 15 miles of where I live in Devon. See for instance
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.