Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
Why Richard Dawkins won’t debate William Lane Craig

Because Richard Dawkins is a spineless pansy who knows that once he gets outside his circle of acquaintances and acolytes, any real debating opposition would stomp him flat.

9 posted on 12/09/2009 11:11:44 AM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (There are only two REAL conservatives in America - myself, and my chosen Presidential candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

I read this piece of critique of Dawkin’s response from this website :

TITLE : Too Busy for the Best

http://aomin.org/aoblog/index.php?itemid=3668

CUT AND PASTE EXCERPT :


Recall that Dawkins’ original comment was: “... and I don’t take on people whose only claim to fame is that they are professional debaters. They gotta have something more than that, I’m busy.” (Whether his busy schedule was due to grammar or finishing school was not specified.) I myself have similar standards, thus:

1. I do not race people whose only claim to fame is that they are professional runners;

2. I do not play chess against people whose only claim to fame is that they are chess masters;

3. I do not play one-on-one with people whose only claim to fame is that they are basketball stars;

4. I do not set my car against people whose only claim to fame is that they have a fast car; and

5. I do not attempt to match the accomplishments of folks whose only claim to fame is that they are in the Guinness Book of World Records ®.

After all, they have to have something more than that, I’m busy.

In fact, I vastly prefer to race people who are famous for eating, to play chess against people who are famous for boxing, to play one-on-one basketball with people who are famous for chess, and to try to match the accomplishments of people who generally aren’t outstanding in the particular field of endeavor in which I’m engaged.

So I can understand why Dawkins would prefer to debate men who have ecclesiastical rank that is unrelated to debating skill (bishops, archbishops, and especially cardinals) rather than someone who is actually famous for debate. After all, who has time for sure defeat? We’re busy!


11 posted on 12/09/2009 11:14:56 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Dawkins a coward. He peddles trash like Obama and HATES God.

The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins
(Paperback - Jan 16, 2008)

God is No Delusion:
A Refutation of Richard Dawkins (Paperback)
By Thomas Crean


12 posted on 12/09/2009 11:18:12 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson