Skip to comments.Obama’s Birth Announcement in 1961 confirmed
Posted on 12/11/2009 1:04:21 AM PST by Electric Graffiti
STAR BULLETIN EDITION OF AUG. 14TH, ON FILE AT BERKLEY IDENTICAL TO PUBLISHED IMAGES by John Charlton
The Post & Email has just received PDF files from a highly credible source, establishing that the birth annoucement in the Star Bulletin Edition of Aug. 14, 1961, for Barack Hussein Obama, is authentic.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
Major university libraries have extensive microfilm newspaper libraries. I was doing some microfilm research at a university a while back, and the guy next to me was looking at Czech newspapers of the 1950s.
Doh! I should have remembered. Thanks.
Natural born status is defined by federal law, specifically § 1401 of the U.S. code. Link
I’ve read them both and neither defines natural-born citizen, or implies more than two forms of citizenship.
I know all about Lieutenant or Colonel, is that filegate? I would have thought it to be called Passport Gate.
Thanks for your response.
And with that, birthers hit rock bottom.
Ah, the McCaskill resolution:
"...There is indirect reason to believe that this may be true. 2d Session S. RES. 511: Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.: In the Senate of the United States. was Sponsored by Senator McCaskill and co-sponsored by Senators Leahy, Obama, Coburn, Clinton and Webb. Why? Why were Democratic Senators trying to pass a Resolution making Senator McCain undoubtedly Legally Eligible when this issue had already been cleared up in 2000 and again in 2004? And why did Senators McCaskill and Obama reportedly insert the following Clause?
Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President;
This Clause has no particular relevance to McCain and the following Clause, which it is reported McCaskill and Obama attempted to REMOVE shows that:
; and Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936:
It seems clear that McCaskill and Obama were attempting to create a blanket Resolution covering ALL Foreign Born candidates. Why do that if not to benefit a Foreign Born Democratic Candidate, who did not have a US Military background?
McCain did not need this resolution, Richardson did not need this Resolution, so far as I can see nobody needed this Resolution unless somebody in the race was born outside the USA and was Covering his/her Ass and the only individual in the race that that could apply to was Senator Obama!"
I'm also given to understand that someone attempted to expand "the children of active duty US military" to "the descendants of active duty US military". That would cover The Onointed one via his granddad...
So how do we define the term? Isn’t it fair to ask the question, which in so many minds, either doesn’t matter or there is a difference of opinion.
I mean, it is not like we cannot without certainty understand, recognize and prove 35 years and 14 years.
Is Barry O. 35+? Probably. Has he been in the US for 14 years? Probably.
How do we define and prove NBC?
LOL I can’t keep track of all of the dems crimes. I must have had a flashback into the Clinton days and typed filegate instead of PassportGate.
Thanks.I have to go correct this.
Swiss Opinion sounds funny.
There is joke in there, to be used in other arguments or plain jest, so I am going to find a way to use it today for grins.
It will have nothing to do with Vattel but require someone to stop and think.
He throws like a girl. What more proof do you require?
Could his real name be: Barack Hussein Ostrich?
I too thought I was in a time machine and you might be talking about a document on a coffee table. LOL
Oops! Now you've done it! Prepare to incur the wrath of the "dual citizen" birthers who believe that the man popularly elected as President will get thrown out of office (and preferably imprisoned and then deported) based on the 18th century musings of a Swiss philosopher.
1401 is newer than the the laws in place, at the time of Barry O.’s Birth. I would think the laws in place, at the time of his birth are the relevant laws.
Also, since there is a question as to where Barry O. was actually born, if he was born outside the U.S. then his NBC status fails on Point G.
We need to prove that he was indeed born here and then the question is pretty much moot, except for the divided nationality issue.
You answered your own question in #103.
What question did NS ask in 103? and then the answer?
He is in opposition to the birther questions but has great answers or debating points.
I just need to think of a way overcome him. LOL
Yeah. The only reason very gravid Mexican women risk sneaking through the desert to drop an anchor baby in Del Norté is so the kid can grow up to be el Presidenté some day.
I would call you an idiot, except as you have cleverly raised this strawman before, and been shot down before, I can only conclude that you are simply an evil man under the pay of other evil men to do your bit to destroy America.
What price treason, these days?
Don’t step in the troll.
The other side of the coin is, why should he produce it if it will be harmful to him? I wouldn’t. Unless you made me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.