Skip to comments.Obama’s Birth Announcement in 1961 confirmed
Posted on 12/11/2009 1:04:21 AM PST by Electric Graffiti
STAR BULLETIN EDITION OF AUG. 14TH, ON FILE AT BERKLEY IDENTICAL TO PUBLISHED IMAGES by John Charlton
The Post & Email has just received PDF files from a highly credible source, establishing that the birth annoucement in the Star Bulletin Edition of Aug. 14, 1961, for Barack Hussein Obama, is authentic.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
Social Security Death Index
about Madelyn Lee Payne Dunham
Name: Madelyn Lee Payne Dunham
Last Residence: 96826 Honolulu, Honolulu, Hawaii
Born: 26 Oct 1922
Died: 2 Nov 2008
State (Year) SSN issued: California (Before
Father: Stanley Armour Dunham b: 23 MAR 1918 in WICHITA, SEDGWICK COUNTY, KANSAS, UNITED STATES
Mother: Madelyn Lee Payne b: 26 OCT 1922 in WICHITA, SEDGWICK COUNTY, KANSAS, UNITED STATES
Where’s the Birth Certificate? notes left in restrooms!!!!
Hahahahahahahaha. Love the idea!
I have an account with Net Detective and Ancestry.com - I just checked both and while her SS Death Index comes up, there is no record on either for a Stanley A. Dunham on her b-day listed on social security.
Things that make you go hmmmmmm
That is his Grandparents, his mother, Stanley A. Dunham was born in November 26, 1942 according to her SSDI Death Index
Try to find a birth certificate for her though, anywhere in the US.
I am not excoriating Obama for not demanding the courts do something they don't have to and won't. Why would I do that when Obama is anything but a honest person? Ihave much more on him to excoriate him about.
I am taking Obama to task for his refusal to show a simple document and get this over with. In the original Berg case he requested the courts verify Obama's BC. Bauers answer, dismiss the case. The courts cannot force Obama to step down but they can petition congress to verify it and answer eligibility questions real citizens of the United States have.
Do we have this last name for Soetoro?
Lolo Soetoro Mangunharjo
I have. His mother was American therefore he is natural born.
I dunno. Name me ONE president in American history who was required to present these personal records. Certainly, the Constitution does not require such personal records. Heck, we didn't even have birth certificated back in 1789! Again, are you arguing that he was not born to an American mother? Otherwise, what is your point?
Make no mistake, BHO and his cronies will push this nation to armed revolution before the next presidential election. The puppet master behind this president wants this, as do most leftists who hold office.
What's irrelevant is your point about Jackson because he was qualified to be president under the US Constitution regardless what nationality his mother or father had at the time of his birth. Andrew Jackson was a US Citizen at the time of the adoption of the Constitution and resided in the United States for 14 years.
Your points in your argument are specious at best. Having two parents as US citizens and being born in the United States is without question a natural born citizen. All other types of citizens, statutory or native born, are not NBC.
“Having two parents as US citizens and being born in the United States is without question a natural born citizen. All other types of citizens, statutory or native born, are not NBC.”
In your opinion. Courts are on record disagreeing.
The Constitution says he must be natural born citizen. In todays world we prove that by records. When America was small they probably shot them before they hit land. They were definately not NBC. /JK
What I am saying is already posted in my comments here in this thread.
I do not feel anyone here should have to wonder about their presidents allegiance. And everyday he proves he is Anti America so it is a valid question.
Tell me when,after BC's were around, we have had a president who had no history in America that could be traced? That hid his parents and grandparents? Tell me when we had a mysterious, where the h*ll did he come from, person in the White House?
Things are different with Obama. He has a extremely radical past and friends and no verification he is NBC. In fact there are reasons to believe he is not NBC so it is time for him to step up and answer the call.
People were not concerned about Bush because his parents are front and center and in politics. People were not concerned about Clinton because his mother and brother were around and he had a political past as governor. People were not concerned about Kennedy because his family was a huge part of his campaign. They were not hidden. Same with Carter. There just was not a reason to question where they were born.
Everything we know about Obama is in his book and everyone is to assume it is factual. You are setting a terrible precedent for future presidential candidates. Mullah's will post a BC online and you will cheerfully say, It's all good!
I am determined to not have this happen in the future. And I am determined as Lloyd Marcus said, to get Obama out of office as soon as possible.
Show us the proof she was American. You have bought into Obama hype and that is not proof.
Then the same can be said of any document, correct? So what constitutes proof of anything any more?
The presumption would be that the UC-Berkeley library has a collection of microfilms/microfiches of a number of out-of-town newspapers covering whatever dates they do, that the Honolulu Star Bulletin would happen to be one of them, and that the library's HSB holdings include the date of the announcement of Obama's birth.
There need not be any link of Obama to the UC-Berkeley campus.
But, though not implausible, I find that the library's permanent holding of the HSB is unlikely. Could it be that on request of the citizen-investigator, the UC-Berkeley library called another library in Hawaii to send them the microfilm or microfiche asked for by the requester and then sent it on to him or her?
BTW, it would be interesting to see if the birth announcement(s) of the Nordyke twins - who we know were born in Hawaii one day before Obama's putative DOB - are also in that same listing that same day. If not, why not?
What requires him, or any other presidential candidate, to do so?
I have shown it for much less than running for president. In fact the things I did show it for I can be a foreign born. POTUS cannot. YOU are actually posting that POTUS does not have to verify citizenship?
Actually I am. No presidential candidate before Obama was required to prove their natural-born citizenship status. That's the unfortunate fact of the matter, and a colossal loophole that some state or Congress will have to close.
Actually no it hasn't and it should not be now. But when your buddy is Chief of DOJ...
It has been for decades, in cases like this one. Republican, Democrat, makes no difference. Sue the president in the performance of his duties and the U.S. Attorney handles it.
That's because Clinton was sued for something he was supposed to have done while governor, not president.
Once Obama ran for POTUS she saw the BC online and said her twins were born around that time. She did not see Stanley Ann in the hospital or know Obama was born that day. She simply assumed as a few others in denial do that Obama's stories are true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.