Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BYRANT [sic] GUMBEL'S LUNG CANCER IS FALSE: News anchorís friend disputes reports
EURweb ^ | December 10, 2009 | Chris Richburg

Posted on 12/11/2009 5:13:22 PM PST by BykrBayb

BYRANT GUMBEL'S LUNG CANCER IS FALSE: News anchor’s friend disputes reports

Sean Cassidy says condition would be 'much more aggressive' than what Gumbel had

By Chris Richburg

(December 10, 2009)

*News of Bryant Gumbel’s battle with lung cancer may have been premature, according to a friend of the television personality who says Gumbel donesn't have the condition. Despite Gumbel’s admission to going under the knife, Sean Cassidy revealed the former “Today Show” host’s situation would have been more serious had he actually been a lung cancer victim.

"A tumor was removed from his chest cavity. It was malignant. It was adjacent to his lung. Lung cancer is much more aggressive than what Bryant had," Cassidy shared in Richard Prince’s online Journal-isms column. "There's a very big difference between Bryant Gumbel's condition and what has been reported in the press."

Cassidy’s revelation comes days after Gumbel opened up about his surgery on Tuesday’s edition of “Live With Regis and Kelly.” According to reports, the 61-year-old journalist said the operation took place two months ago as a malignant tumor and part of his lung were removed. Gumbel co-hosted the show with Ripa in place of Regis Philbin, who is recovering from recent hip replacement surgery.

"It's nothing to hide from,” Gumbel said. “They opened up my chest, they took out a malignant tumor, they took out part of my lung and they took out some other goodies. Even with the surgery, some aggressive cancer cells had escaped, 'so I went through some treatment and it's done now.”

Why Gumbel’s lung had to be partially removed was something Cassidy said he could not explain. As he told Journal-isms, he's not a doctor.

Despite his medical status, Gumbel continued to play an active role on his HBO sports newsmagazine, “Real Sports.” So much so, the newsman said he kept the show’s staff in the dark about what he went through. Gumbel’s efforts proved successful as he ended up taping shows on September 15 and October 27, without missing an episode.

Gumbel’s willingness to share his situation soon became a double-edged sword as speculation over the cancer increased after he said "'We hope. We hope, it's over.” The remark resulted in rumblings that the cancer, which was assumed to be in Gumbel’s lung, was still active.

Media outlets later picked up on the story, with headlines stating that Gumbel did indeed have lung cancer. Even NBC, the network Gumbel formerly called home, acknowledged the story as it reported that Gumbel had lung cancer.

Upon seeing the news reports, Cassidy, who serves as president of the New York-based public relations firm DKC, became determined to set the record straight on Gumbel’s medical standing.

"When you're diagnosed with cancer, it has to be monitored,” the executive maintained. “His prognosis is very good."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bryantgumbel; cancer; gumbel; lungcancer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
This is strange. Even in this denial, what the "friend" describes sure sounds like lung cancer. Not all lung cancer is aggressive.

I wonder what other "goodies" they removed besides the malignant (cancerous) tumor and part of his lung. My guess would be they took some surrounding lymph nodes, and that's how he knew "some aggressive cancer cells had escaped."

It sounds to me like he naively thought he could go public with the news of his lung cancer, without serious backlash or loss of income. Now his friend is trying to cover for him.

1 posted on 12/11/2009 5:13:23 PM PST by BykrBayb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

Personally, I have no interest in the details of My Gumbal’s private medical condition, nor do I expect him to publish his private medical records.

If it was me, I’d tell everyone to mind their own damned bidnez...


2 posted on 12/11/2009 5:17:37 PM PST by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bean Counter

Yeah, he should have realized lung cancer is a dirty little secret and kept his mouth shut.


3 posted on 12/11/2009 5:19:31 PM PST by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ √ě)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bean Counter

Think I’d just trust Gumble on this one.


4 posted on 12/11/2009 5:19:46 PM PST by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb
Well, I don't know Gumble and don't really care. I have many people I know and care about for whom I feel compassion. When it comes to some stranger who coincidentally happens to be a bigotted asshole, I just seem to be a little short this month.
5 posted on 12/11/2009 5:22:37 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

He looked GREAT and HEALTHY!! I was channel surfing and saw some of it! I couldn’t believe the lung cancer because he looked GREAT!


6 posted on 12/11/2009 5:29:47 PM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion,,,,,,the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

Can’t say I blame you there. I didn’t post it to garner any sympathy for him. I just thought it was interesting, and might open up conversation about lung cancer. The information in the article is so contradictory. I’m curious what more knowledgeable FReepers might add, to clear things up.


7 posted on 12/11/2009 5:31:16 PM PST by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ √ě)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

You know, I’m not comfortable with the title atop of this article “...Gumbels Lung Cancer is False...”. It was absolutely cancer, a malignant cancer...so if it was 2mm or 2 inches from his lung, who cares? They obviously removed the part of his lung that was in the path of the malignancy to check for invasion.

Quite possibly people think he’s exaggerating the danger he’s in...& that’s ok too. I don’t prefer Bryant Gumble, but I sympathize with anyone who gets cancer. All these years of drinking the chemicals in the water, & the pesticides in the produce, & God knows what other man made synthetic crap we’ve consumed...because everyone will probably have a bout with a form of cancer some time in their lives. It seems like everyone is getting it lately...& the people I know who are getting it are not smokers. They did not inherit it genetically either.

Cancer is just showing up everywhere - especially in the reproductive organs of men & women.....hmmmm, anyone know what John Holdren has been up to for the last 12 years? I was just recalling his words regarding population control...

It makes me wonder how it is possible that so many people are experiencing cancer - & of course this will be one of the main things that gets rationed, or cut out completely under the new death care.

Anyway, my prayers go out to Bryant, & anyone else who has to face the fear of cancer.


8 posted on 12/11/2009 5:32:34 PM PST by Atom Smasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

Yeah, it’s amazing how well some people handle cancer treatment.


9 posted on 12/11/2009 5:32:41 PM PST by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ √ě)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Atom Smasher

Yeah its bad news to beat up on a guy because a friend says his diagnosis is false.


10 posted on 12/11/2009 5:38:07 PM PST by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

I’ll miss “Gumbel to Gumbel”.


11 posted on 12/11/2009 5:38:49 PM PST by BallyBill (WARNING:Taking me serious could cause stress related illness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Atom Smasher

Right. The malignant tumor was cancer, whether it was inside his lung, or outside.

His friend makes the erroneous claim that if it was lung cancer, it would necessarily be more aggressive than whatever Gumbel has, which the friend never does name. Lung cancer is sometimes very aggressive, but not always.


12 posted on 12/11/2009 5:40:20 PM PST by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ √ě)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

Sarah Brady had lung cancer several years ago.

Everyone does not die following this diagnosis.

Brother in law had lung cancer surgery over a year ago. He’s doing fine with no return of the cancer at this time.


13 posted on 12/11/2009 5:46:04 PM PST by Carley (OBAMA IS A MALEVOLENT FORCE IN THE WORLD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

I thought corrections went out that day regarding this.


14 posted on 12/11/2009 5:49:22 PM PST by John W (The more predictable we are, the more vulnerable we are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carley

The statistics for lung cancer are grim, but people are not statistics. There are many variables. That’s good news about your bil’s recovery. I’ll pray for continuing clean scans.


15 posted on 12/11/2009 5:52:56 PM PST by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ √ě)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: John W

Really? This is the first I’ve heard of any “corrections.” I put that in quotes, because I’m not convinced this version is correct.

Any word on what type of cancer he had, if not lung cancer?


16 posted on 12/11/2009 5:54:27 PM PST by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ √ě)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb
I'M NOT A BIG Gumbel fan and I wish cancer on none of my enemies but Gumbel is definitely parter of the lower food chain.
17 posted on 12/11/2009 5:57:20 PM PST by Larry381 ("in the final instance civilization is always saved by a platoon of soldiers" Oswald Spengler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

Looking back, found a USA Today and Newsday story from December 8th. But, Cassidy, identified as Gumbel’s “spokesman” in USA Today is the source for both. In the short paragraph available from Newsday without a subscription it says another source confirmed a “friend”.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/2009-12-08-gumbel-tumor_N.htm

http://www.newsday.com/entertainment/bryant-gumbel-s-illness-not-lung-cancer-1.1643760


18 posted on 12/11/2009 6:03:08 PM PST by John W (The more predictable we are, the more vulnerable we are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

Thanks so much.

There have been many advances in previously terminal cancers.

Pancreatic cancer is treatable now and many have survived for quite a while.

The writer of this article seems way off base here.


19 posted on 12/11/2009 6:03:36 PM PST by Carley (OBAMA IS A MALEVOLENT FORCE IN THE WORLD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Larry381

I doubt anyone here is a big (or even little) Gumbel fan. For me, the interesting thing about this story is the cancer itself.


20 posted on 12/11/2009 6:04:42 PM PST by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ √ě)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson