Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Secret Space Shuttles
Air & Space Magazine ^ | 8/01/2009 | By Michael Cassutt

Posted on 12/12/2009 11:28:58 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld

The giant gold and silver satellite glittered against the black sky as space shuttle Atlantis closed in on it from below. Commander Hoot Gibson and pilot Guy Gardner flew the approach, while mission specialist Mike Mullane, at the other end of the flight deck, readied the shuttle’s robot arm for a capture. Downstairs in the airlock, mission specialists Jerry Ross and Bill Shepherd waited in their spacesuits for Gibson’s order to go outside and attempt a rescue.

The mission of STS-27 had been to deploy the first in a series of new spy satellites that used radar to observe ground targets, in any kind of weather, day or night. But shortly after the astronauts released the spacecraft, called ONYX, from the shuttle’s cargo bay, on December 2, 1988, one of its antenna dishes had failed to open. Without intervention by the crew, the billion-dollar satellite would become a hunk of space junk. As it turned out, they succeeded in grabbing, fixing, and re-releasing ONYX, for which they later received a medal from the U.S. intelligence community.

At least that’s one possible scenario for what happened. The astronauts may just as well have fixed the satellite without a spacewalk by Ross and Shepherd. We don’t know because not a word of the ONYX rescue was reported in newspapers or on television. Why not?

Because STS-27 was—and remains—a secret mission.

Between 1982 and 1992, NASA launched 11 shuttle flights with classified payloads, honoring a deal that dated to 1969, when the National Reconnaissance Office—an organization so secret its name could not be published at the time—requested certain changes to the design of NASA’s new space transportation system.

(Excerpt) Read more at airspacemag.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: 1982; 1992; aerospace; airforce; classified; coldwar; intelligence; militech; miltech; nasa; nro; onyx; space; spaceintelligence; spacelasers; spaceshuttle; spysatellite; sts27; usaf; usmilitary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: Born to Conserve

“Panama Theory”

Can’t find any links - do you know of one? Or care to expound further? Very interested guy here.


41 posted on 12/13/2009 5:11:31 AM PST by PIF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: David Isaac

Lucifer’s Hammer is one of the best SF apocalypse/post apocalypse novels. These two men are better together than apart.


42 posted on 12/13/2009 5:28:13 AM PST by hocndoc (http://www.LifeEthics.org (I've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Eyes Unclouded; Finny
There are four separate challenges that must be met if the US is to remain (some would say again become) a/the superpower.

We must maintain a creditable nuclear force, and have proven method to deliver such weapons

We must be able to fight a large scale conventional war, and at the same time fight another large scale holding action until the first is completed.

We must rule the high ground of Space, both for reconnaissance and weapons platform purposes.

We must be able to defeat counterinsurgencies and their associated terror campaigns.

Space is exceptionally helpful in a three other areas, but it not the sole battle ground.

43 posted on 12/13/2009 5:29:02 AM PST by MindBender26 (Never kick Dems when they're down. Wait 'till they're 1/2 way back up. You get much better leverage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PIF

As I understand it, it is a strategic theory that
whoever controls the sun-earth lagrangian points controls space.


44 posted on 12/13/2009 5:41:09 AM PST by Repeal The 17th (I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: octex
SOS... Wouldn’t firing a missile from a satellite result in the satellite moving in the opposite direction and losing its normal orbit? ....I’ll vote for the lasers.

Not necessarily. It would affect the satellite if the missile tubes were closed at the bottom but not if they were open.

Think rifle vs. bazooka.

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

45 posted on 12/13/2009 5:58:08 AM PST by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
yeah history suck, they did not all go tramping in forests

Further north, near Maastricht, in one of the war’s most daring missions, German paracommandos of Koch Storm Detachment captured Belgium’s Eben Emael, Europe’s largest and most powerful fort, by landing in gliders atop the huge, underground work, then knocking out its cannon and turrets with a newly introduced secret weapon, shaped charge explosives. Fifteen intrepid Germans immobilized the 800-man garrison. This writer was fortunate enough to have been given a tour of the fort by one of its 1940 Belgian defenders.

anyone having any faith in fixed defenses and not preparing for full out assault will get their clocks cleaned.

that's just life

46 posted on 12/13/2009 6:12:42 AM PST by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

here is some stuff on all this, my only point is with tech the way it is today relying on fixed anything is a fools game

just my opinion

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iD_rX71O78I


47 posted on 12/13/2009 6:15:47 AM PST by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

“Because STS-27 was—and remains—a secret mission. Not any more.”

If two or more people know a secret, it is not a secret.


48 posted on 12/13/2009 6:49:42 AM PST by Blue Collar Christian ( What happened to my tag line?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Got a triangular object above the trees in second to last clip:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Fx5WFT3Ef8


49 posted on 12/13/2009 6:59:04 AM PST by bunkerhill7 (God bless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc

“Lucifer’s Hammer is one of the best SF apocalypse/post apocalypse novels.”

I agree. I need to uncrate my SF collection to see if I still have a copy, as I would love to reread that book.

Thank you again


50 posted on 12/13/2009 7:02:03 AM PST by David Isaac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

Only if those points are in fact stable... else too much energy needed to sustain.

Better yet:
Whoever controls Mars, controls the inner solar system including the lagrange points.


51 posted on 12/13/2009 7:04:55 AM PST by PIF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz
I have known about STS-27 for at least 15 years.
52 posted on 12/13/2009 7:06:12 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (usff.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone
the parts of the third valkyrie were never destroyed, they just diappeared...using a design similar to the x-40, launched from under the valkarie, it is pretty damn feasable for this scenario....

The supposed name of that project, per Aviation Leak, is Blackstar
53 posted on 12/13/2009 7:39:19 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

WELL! You could have at least told us!!!


54 posted on 12/13/2009 8:37:38 AM PST by null and void (We are now in day 326 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
Anyone having any faith in fixed defenses and not preparing for full out assault will get their clocks cleaned.

Agreed. All part of a big package. If I remember correclty, while the Germans were way far advanced in aviation during WWII, Hitler was stupid in how he used that tech, and weakened its usefulness. The German twin engine Me262 was the world's first operational fighter jet (key word: operational; yes, the Brits had I think it was called the Meteor, but it was NOT in combat with or shooting down/being shot down by enemy fighters, as were the Me262s). IIRC, Hitler stupidly chose to use it as a bomber instead of a fighter (it could go about 100 mph faster than a Mustang). And interestingly, although it was a jet in the age of prop fighers like Mustangs and Spitfires, at least one fast-thinking American pilot, Lt. Urban Drew, in the P-51 "Detroit Miss," shot down THREE Me262s (he was credited with two kills, having blown the landing gear out of the third). He did it as the planes were taking off from the runway.

So it just shows that technology is important ... but the real deciding factor are the minds of the men using the tech. I hope the U.S. goes balls-out to aggressivily pursue superiority in space tech, and I agree with another poster that NASA is the wrong critter to do it.

55 posted on 12/13/2009 10:20:41 AM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: null and void
I would of if I had realized it was a big secret!!!
56 posted on 12/13/2009 12:24:08 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (usff.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu
Not this Hoot

This Hoot Gibson

Robert L. Gibson (Captain, USN)
NASA Astronaut (former)

57 posted on 12/13/2009 1:37:44 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

BUMP!


58 posted on 12/13/2009 2:42:41 PM PST by Publius6961 (Â…he's not America, he's an employee who hasn't risen to minimal expectations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: LonePalm; sonofstrangelove; Lucky Dog; Myrddin; Sparticus

Thanks to you all for giving logical replies to my question regarding possible recoil from a missle firing.

Guess I was too close to sleep time to think clearly when I posed the question. lol


59 posted on 12/13/2009 5:25:12 PM PST by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson