Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: State high-speed train rides to be costlier, ridership lower than promised to voters
Mercury News ^ | 12/15/09 | Mike Rosenberg

Posted on 12/15/2009 9:23:55 AM PST by NormsRevenge

Those hoping to ride the state's high-speed train next decade will have to dig much deeper into their wallets than officials originally thought, a harsh reality that will chase away millions of passengers, according to an updated business plan released Monday.

The average ticket on the bullet train from San Francisco to Los Angeles is now estimated to cost about $105, or 83 percent of comparable airfare. Last year, the state said prices would be set at 50 percent of comparable airfare and predicted a ticket from San Francisco to Los Angeles would cost $55.

As a result of the higher fares, state officials now think the service will attract 41 million annual riders by 2035, down from last year's prediction of 55 million passengers by 2030.

Finally, the cost of the project — recently pegged at $33.6 billion in 2008 dollars — is now estimated at $42.6 billion in time-of-construction dollars.

The gloomy forecasts are included in the California High-Speed Rail Authority's updated business plan, which the state Legislature required the authority to submit by today.

The authority last produced a business plan in 2008. State officials had used what turned out to be optimistic ridership and ticket price forecasts in presenting a $9.9 billion bond measure called Proposition 1A, which voters approved in November 2008.

Authority Deputy Director Jeff Barker said while the numbers have changed, the "spirit of what the people voted for" with Proposition 1A remains the same.

(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: ahnold; arnold; boondoggle; california; costlier; highspeed; kalifornia; promised; prop1a; rail; ridership; train; waste; willie
One more lump of coal in the voters Xmas stickings..
1 posted on 12/15/2009 9:23:55 AM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

while the numbers have changed, the “spirit of what the people voted for” with Proposition 1A remains the same.

Would those be pre- or post-stimulus voters?

You can sell anything to an uninformed, well-indoctrinated mass of doofs like California voters... and if you’re lucky, get them to pay top dollar for the excesses too.


2 posted on 12/15/2009 9:27:02 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. May yur bandwidth exceed your girth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

No problem. They can just tack a special tax on airfare between SF and LA and take it for the trains.

That’s the way things are gonna work anymore...


3 posted on 12/15/2009 9:28:57 AM PST by Pessimist (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

....I guess they will have to count on a lot of foreign tourists for ridership. Between them, the poor and the very rich thats all that will be left in good ‘ol Kalifonia


4 posted on 12/15/2009 9:31:19 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The thing isn’t even built and the cost has gone up ~40%. Any bets that it won’t end up about 80 billion dollars before they are done?


5 posted on 12/15/2009 9:32:49 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“Those hoping to ride the state’s high-speed train next decade will have to dig much deeper into their wallets than officials originally thought”.....

Oh sure!.....dig all you want....all you’ll find is pocket lint.


6 posted on 12/15/2009 9:33:18 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pessimist

I was thinking the same thing. Once (if) it it built, they will tax the airline competition.

Is that even legal, though?


7 posted on 12/15/2009 9:33:46 AM PST by battlecry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Seems like the money could be better spent increasing capacity at the airports and fixing up I-5 in the Central Valley. There no way a family is going to shell out $400 or more to take the train say from No Cal to Disneyland.


8 posted on 12/15/2009 9:34:57 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Good luck with that boondoggle! L.O.L.!


9 posted on 12/15/2009 9:35:03 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: battlecry
Is that even legal, though?

Since when did that matter in Californistan?

10 posted on 12/15/2009 9:35:50 AM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: battlecry

I guess since flights from say SFO to LAX do not cross state boundaries The Feds have no say on the matter.


11 posted on 12/15/2009 9:36:00 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: battlecry

“Is that even legal, though?”

You’re kidding, right?

Like that matters.


12 posted on 12/15/2009 9:37:29 AM PST by incredulous joe (Bacon makes everything better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Underestimated and underperforming? That NEVER happens with government programs!!


13 posted on 12/15/2009 9:38:06 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Finally, the cost of the project — recently pegged at $33.6 billion in 2008 dollars — is now estimated at $42.6 billion in time-of-construction dollars.

In one year costs have increased by 25%.

14 posted on 12/15/2009 9:38:06 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Wille Green is not amused.


15 posted on 12/15/2009 9:41:49 AM PST by WOBBLY BOB (ACORN:American Corruption for Obama Right Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Sac bee

The Buzz: California high-speed rail estimate jumps $9 billion

http://www.sacbee.com/capitolandcalifornia/story/2395807.html

Cost estimates for California’s high-speed rail line from San Francisco to Anaheim jumped from $33.6 billion to $42.6 billion .. new business plan released Monday. The main difference? .. inflation costs between 2012 and 2020, when .. construction would take place. .. relies on $17 billion to $19 billion in federal dollars over that period.


16 posted on 12/15/2009 9:44:04 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. May yur bandwidth exceed your girth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Willie Green is deeply saddened.


17 posted on 12/15/2009 10:01:17 AM PST by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG 49) "Freedom's Fortress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I wonder if this accounts for all those enviro-tards who are going to sue to stop the contruction of this railine because it will affect the habitat for an endangered weed or microbe.


18 posted on 12/15/2009 10:02:18 AM PST by cups
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
CA: State high-speed train rides to be costlier, ridership lower than promised to voters

Rail costs more than the politicians promised and will have fewer riders. Wow. What a surprise. Who didn't see that coming?

However, politically favored construction companies will get a lot more taxpayer plunder than predicted, and the effort will provide a lot more high paying state jobs at the taxpayers expense. Again who didn't see that coming?

19 posted on 12/15/2009 10:16:16 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Just double the cost and fare figures and you will be about right. Transit projects always costs twice as much as projected and ridership is half as much as expected.
20 posted on 12/15/2009 10:19:10 AM PST by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Is the METRO TRAIN making $$?

What does make money...when Government runs it?

Besides the I.R.S.

21 posted on 12/15/2009 10:26:38 AM PST by Osage Orange (Obama's a self-made man who worships his own creator...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
There no way a family is going to shell out $400 or more to take the train say from No Cal to Disneyland.

Not when you can drive there in a compact car for 2 tanks of gas, $60 -$70 dollars.

22 posted on 12/15/2009 10:35:58 AM PST by A message
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Statement: "The average ticket on the bullet train from San Francisco to Los Angeles is now estimated to cost about $105, or 83 percent of comparable airfare. Last year, the state said prices would be set at 50 percent of comparable airfare and predicted a ticket from San Francisco to Los Angeles would cost $55."

Response: When are American citizens going to learn that every word out of the mouth of a governmental official, elected or appointed, is a lie. Not only a lie but a damn lie!

23 posted on 12/15/2009 10:43:23 AM PST by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WOBBLY BOB

Wille Green is not amused.

Perfect. Yes, Willie, where are you?


24 posted on 12/15/2009 10:44:37 AM PST by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
I guess since flights from say SFO to LAX do not cross state boundaries The Feds have no say on the matter.

Hah hah hah hah! That's a good one! States rights! Hah hah hah! But really, did anything on the plane come from outside the state? What about connecting flights and passengers? Oh well, time to invoke the all powerful interstate commerce clause! Feds win again!

25 posted on 12/15/2009 10:51:12 AM PST by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

When the airlines were regulated by the Feds the rules did not apply to in-state flights. Flights from LAX to SFO were not controlled by the Feds and those flights were much cheaper than comparable services across state lines, the Northeast shuttles. That was one of the pieces of evidence to support deregulation during the 1970s.


26 posted on 12/15/2009 11:15:13 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: battlecry

Legal? What’s that?

Anymore, it’s whatever they say it is.

Sad times indeed.


27 posted on 12/15/2009 11:17:39 AM PST by Pessimist (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: equalitybeforethelaw
Willie, where are you?
28 posted on 12/15/2009 11:49:02 AM PST by dearolddad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Hal
Transit projects always costs twice as much as projected and ridership is half as much as expected.

And the speed will be about half that predicted.

29 posted on 12/15/2009 12:03:46 PM PST by CharacterCounts (November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

That was in the good ‘ol days when even Democrats had limits on their boldness. Now they’re willing to justify tossing you in jail, depriving you of your very freedom, simply for not buying a product that they mandate. And they are doing so on that magically potent argument that since they can regulate “interstate commerce” they can regulate everything. This current group has no respect for states rights. If they determine some political benefit in regulating intrastate flights, they’ll do it. Who’s going to stop them, the supreme court? Hah! They allowed restrictions on political speech and a massive expansion on how the government can use eminent domain to confiscate private property and that’s before Obama started appointing judges.


30 posted on 12/15/2009 12:04:05 PM PST by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I'd be surprised if it attracts even 10 million passengers a year. No matter because the White Elephant will never be built.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find only things evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelogus

31 posted on 12/15/2009 12:11:30 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Authority Deputy Director Jeff Barker said while the numbers have changed, the "spirit of what the people voted for" with Proposition 1A remains the same.

What a bunch of total crap this guy is spewing forth!

32 posted on 12/15/2009 12:49:16 PM PST by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; Willie Green

Well, here it is Willie. Not even built yet, and already ticket prices are rising. By the time it’s done ticket prices will be at 150% of an airline ticket - and subsidized by the taxpayers to even achieve that rate !

Boondoggle !


33 posted on 12/15/2009 1:04:19 PM PST by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Shinkansen in the west coast only has about a fifth of the pop density as Tokyo-Osaka.

Can anyone say “white elephant”?


34 posted on 12/15/2009 1:53:16 PM PST by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"CA: State high-speed train rides to be costlier, ridership lower than promised to voters "

What a surprise! Who knew?

35 posted on 12/15/2009 7:21:21 PM PST by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dearolddad; equalitybeforethelaw
Willie, where are you?

Helpful hint for clueless noobs: The odds of obtaining a response are greatly enhanced once you learn to put "Willie Green" in the "To:" box of the reply screen.
On FreeRepublic, this is what is known as a "ping".
Most FReepers don't mind being pinged. In fact, it is considered to be an obligatory courtesy when mentioning them on a thread on which they haven't yet participated.

The lone exception to this is Arthur McGowan.
Please do not ping Arthur unless absolutely necessary.
He has suffered enough and further torment on this topic is considered to be cruel.

36 posted on 12/16/2009 5:31:47 AM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
As a result of the higher fares, state officials now think the service will attract 41 million annual riders by 2035, down from last year's prediction of 55 million passengers by 2030.

One more lump of coal in the voters Xmas stickings..

Better hold on to that coal, Normie.
By 2030~35, it'll be a precious commodity as Kalifornicators will be forced to squeeze it for every expensive drop of Oil they can get out of it.
THEN they will wish they had the foresight to build the high-speed rail system when they had the chance.

37 posted on 12/16/2009 5:56:40 AM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green; All

Willie, I have been hearing we will be out of oil crap since I was a kid..


38 posted on 12/20/2009 3:01:57 PM PST by KevinDavis (Can't Stop the Signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson