Skip to comments.Obama Refuses to Release Facts of Fort Hood Massacre
Posted on 12/16/2009 1:43:58 PM PST by Tamar Rush
The congressional leaders, Mr. Hoekstra maintains, have received no detailed, substantive briefing on the event and what is known about its perpetrator.
Were going home next week, (and) they will have effectively made it through three months with giving no substantive briefings on Fort Hood, the congressman says.
The position of President Obama, Mr. Hoekstra insists, violates the Constitution which holds that the administration must ensure that the congressional intelligence committees are kept fully and currently informed of the intelligence activities of the United States.The committees, according to Mr. Hoekstra, have only received a scripted presentation where most of the questions were answered with, We dont know, Were checking into that, Well get back to you, Let us finish our initial investigation here. We dont want to jeopardize any criminal prosecutions, and all those kinds of things.
On November 5, U.S. Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan, a psychiatrist in the Army Medical Corps, screamed Allahu akbar! and proceeded to open fire in a facility on the Fort Hood military base in Texas, killing 13, including one civilian, and injuring 30 more.
It was later discovered that U.S. intelligence agencies knew Hasan had been communicating with a radical imam, Anwar al-Aulaqi, who had fled the United States
(Excerpt) Read more at thelastcrusade.org ...
* for later.
The 0 defended him, the MSM defended him. We live in a Twilight Zone episode.
Maybe he was just fulfilling the Koranic command the one muslim must aid another muslim against the infidel.
This should cost him 2 points on the Richter scale of achievement..popularity.
It will be “leaked” and meanwhile Obama only looks like a Terrorist sympathizer
What? — possible “aid and comfort” to the enemy. Hmmmm sounds a bit “treasonous” to me.
The Age of the 0bamanation IS The Age of Treasom!
Muslims must protect each other. Reasonable action.
Psst, didn't you get the email that we mustn't jump to conclusions?
“Thou hast said it..”
“Psst, didn’t you get the email that we mustn’t jump to conclusions?”
That is, unless the situation involves a police officer trying to arrest a PhD at one of the country’s elite universities. Then, by all means, jump.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.