[MHGinTN]

“Obtaining the video feeds can provide insurgents with critical information ...” Well then, I’m sure the bastard-in-chief will see to it they get this data a.s.a.p., to be fair don’tchaknow.

[myknowledge]

But the Iraqi insurgents cannot hack this.

The U.S. Army Aviation should employ COIN aircraft like the unhackable OV-10 instead of hackable UAVs.

[BGHater]

‘remotely flown planes had unprotected communications links.’

Some cordless home phones have encrypted feedback and Pentagon, inc. doesn’t run their drones with encryption? UNREAL.

[bunkerhill7]

scrambling/encryption only cost $25 a shot- these terror guys actually go to college n flight school- you`know= -we are not dealng with idiots y`know -if DOD had any brains they uplink it to SATCOM and jump/triple scramble it via microwave-

[jessduntno]

The hackers were unavailable for comment...they were attending a state dinner at the White House...

[Mr. Jazzy]

Maybe we let them see what we WANTED them to see ...

I’m just sayin’ ...

[bsf2009]

DARPA should award the insurgents $40,000. /sarc

[pointsal]

How about plausibly real video feeds? Get the bad boys to pose on a roof or ridge waiting for the show to begin....
Kinda like the scene from Red October where the Rusky shoots himself.

[Klemper]

As soon as we realized this, we should have immediately started broadcasting “dummy” drone footage on those same frequencies, so those morons would be intercepting false drone info. This would be simple to do, and could give us the opportunity to make them think we were searching somewhere insignificant... making them come out of hiding and then *WHAMMO*

[Cindy]

ON THE INTERNET:

http://internet-haganah.com/harchives/006698.html

18 December 2009

“EXCELLENT!”

SNIPPET: “You can’t feed the opposition bogus video feeds until they start intercepting the video feeds.”