"For example, contrary to Darwinian orthodoxy, the fossil record actually challenges the idea that all organisms have evolved from a single common ancestor. Why? Fossil studies reveal a biological big bang near the beginning of the Cambrian period (520 million years ago) when many major, separate groups of organisms or phyla (including most animal body plans) emerged suddenly without clear precursors.
The evidence that you are trying to use to disprove evolution, falsifies creation.
Isn't cognitive dissonance a wonderful thing : )
You say “suddenly” but the “Cambrian Explosion” went on for 30 million years.
You philosophical naturalists crack me up :-)
" The evidence that you are trying to use to disprove evolution, falsifies creation."
The evidence itself neither proves nor disproves anything. It is the interpretation of evidence through a preferred philosophical paradigm and logical fallacy that leads you to believe you are looking at 'proof' or 'falsification'. There are only philosophical positions, not empirical ones.
"Isn't cognitive dissonance a wonderful thing : )"
Apparently... :-)
You creationists crack me up : )
“For example, contrary to Darwinian orthodoxy, the fossil record actually challenges the idea that all organisms have evolved from a single common ancestor. Why? Fossil studies reveal a biological big bang near the beginning of the Cambrian period (520 million years ago) when many major, separate groups of organisms or phyla (including most animal body plans) emerged suddenly without clear precursors.
The evidence that you are trying to use to disprove evolution, falsifies creation.
Isn’t cognitive dissonance a wonderful thing : )
That’s funny, like the incessant liberal logic that the rocks are really old because of the old fossils we find in them, and how do we know the fossils are old?
Well that’s easy, because of the really old rocks we found them in.
And the audacity with the liberal projection of cognitive dissonance, is what’s truly highly entertaining!