Posted on 12/25/2009 5:43:16 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
I meant exactly as I said. Pat is a Sunday Morning Whore.
So now you don’t think Buchanan is an anti-semite.
You should watch your name calling or you will get labeled as a race baiter like the Democrats and RINOs.
That Israel hating thing comes to mind.
Are you calling President Reagan an anti-semite, too? Buchanan was good enough for him.
This is why we can’t roll back the socialist movement, people like you attack every conservative as being a racist.
You and the elite RINOs just join the Democrats in protecting the status quo using that lie.
YAWN....This is going to be a pointless arguement that leads nowhere. It is like talking to a 911 truther.
Everyone who disagrees with you is a RINO elitist swine who should be stoned and burned at the stake. Buchanan never made insulting remarks about Israel, but even if he did,Reagan liked him so that makes him Ok in your book. I get it. Every thing that I say can be twisted into what ever you desire it to be. Maybe you spent too much time on DUM or Obama website and learned a thing or two.
You are deluded by the Buchanan cult. Like being a Paulite. You are will to crash and burn to save whatever your vision of conservatism is. Good luck with getting Buchanan elected. You would be better served plowing the sea.
So far, you’ve expressed the spin of RINOs and Democrats.
You haven’t presented one fact to back up your hateful words, as always.
You know, that’s just low.
Are these marginalized groups really more extreme than the "mainstream" RINO-Lib cultural marxist elite?
“I didn’t say 99% of the military, I said my UNIT”
But you said his kids in the military can attest to your claim, so you must have meant 99% of the military in general.
The number appears to be exaggerated to an extreme.
Unless you’re right there to witness the morale of both my brothers and me, then you’ll just have to assume (and assume spells making an ASS out of you and me). My point in the rebuttal to this jerk wassn’t so much the percentage, but the attack from him/her against me after I POLITELY disagreed with him after expressing my gratitude with serving with his family members. He/she was a jerk for no reason except that I disagreed (sounds like the liberals we battle everyday, huh?). Nevertheless, morale regarding this campaign is very low. Either send us in to win or don’t send us in. Iraq was plain silly and a waste of your money and mine; if we had stayed focus on Afghanistan and had been given the rules of engagement in order to win, we’d be done by now. Now we are stuck in a winless cause that could have been won long ago.
We’re blurring some things here.
General morale is entirely separate from opinion regarding whether or not Iraq was a just war.
Morale of troops in Afghanistan is separate from morale of troops in Iraq.
There are ways to know what the troops think of the Iraq war other than being right there. And I am aware that support for the war has been significantly higher than 50%.
And another thing. You say Afghanistan could have been won, but now it’s somehow “winless.” A self-contradictory statement.
If I were a football player that usually plays very well, but today I throw six interceptions against the Detroit Lions because I've had a horrible game plan, day, coach, whatever the reason, then it's not contradictory to say that we could have won but now the prospects are winless due to the missteps leading to it being 30 seconds left and no chance to win.
So it’s the clock that limits the game, you mean.
True. And Obama started the clock. So your argument tells us we’re losing because of Obama’s decisions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.