I firmly believe that even if Christ descended upon Earth and performed miracles in the presence of all of these atheists..irrefutable evidence that Jesus Christ IS the Son of God, they still wouldn't believe him. To do so would mean that they would need to admit they were wrong all along. And they will take that mistake to the gates of Hell and beyond. As C.S. Lewis once said, the gates of Gell are locked from the INSIDE.
They can listen to Moses, so to speak.
If they don't choose to believe Scripture, then they wouldn't be convinced is someone rose from the dead.
For all the evos who claim that someone regrowing limbs would convince them, it wouldn't. Their lack of belief isn't do to not enough *evidence*, but their own choice. The *lack of evidence* is just an excuse.
What's really ironic, however, is that they then go on to disparage anyone who uses evidence to support their beliefs saying that true faith doesn't rest on evidence because if you have evidence, you don't have real faith or that your faith is *weak*, because in their book faith is believing in something there's no evidence for.
So where they get off claiming that they would have faith if there were better evidence is beyond me.