Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

At Tiny Rates, Saving Money Costs Investors
New York Times ^ | December 26, 2009 | Stephanie Strom

Posted on 12/26/2009 3:01:06 AM PST by reaganaut1

Millions of Americans are paying a high price for a safe place to put their money: extremely low interest rates on savings accounts and certificates of deposit.

The elderly and others on fixed incomes have been especially hard hit. Many have seen returns on savings, C.D.’s and government bonds drop to niggling amounts recently, often costing them money once inflation, fees and taxes are considered.

“Open a Savings Plus Account today and get a great rate,” read an advertisement in the Dec. 16 Newsday for Citibank, which was then offering 1.2 percent for an account. (As low as it was, the offer was good only for accounts of $25,000 and up.)

“They’re advertising it in the papers as if they’re actually proud of that,” said Steven Weisman, a title insurance consultant in New York. “It’s a joke.”

The advertised rate for the Savings Plus account has expired, according to the bank’s Web site; as of Friday, the account paid an interest rate of 0.5 percent. The bank’s highest-yield savings account, the Ultimate, was paying 1.01 percent.

The best deal Mr. Weisman has found is 2 percent on a one-year certificate of deposit offered by ING Direct, an online bank that has become a bit of a darling among the fixed-income crowd.

Interest on one- and two-year Treasury notes was just 0.40 percent and 0.89 percent, as of Monday. Bank of America offers 0.35 percent on a standard money market account with $10,000 to $25,000, and Wells Fargo will pay 0.05 percent on a basic savings account.

Indeed, after fees are subtracted, inflation is accounted for and taxes are paid, many investors in C.D.’s, government bonds and savings and money market accounts are losing money.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: federalreserve; interestrates
Keynesians always favor debtors over savers. Ten-year Treasury bond yields have risen to 3.8% (they started the year at about 2%), suggesting that bond investors are becoming more concerned about inflation. The Democrats support policies such as higher minimum wages, forced unionization, and health insurance mandates that boost unemployment. The Rats will scream if the Fed starts raising rates while unemployment is still high but will never admit that their policies are responsible.
1 posted on 12/26/2009 3:01:10 AM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
“What the average citizen doesn’t explicitly understand is that a significant part of the government’s plan to repair the financial system and the economy is to pay savers nothing and allow damaged financial institutions to earn a nice, guaranteed spread,” said William H. Gross, co-chief investment officer of the Pacific Investment Management Company, or Pimco. “It’s capitalism, I guess, but it’s not to be applauded.”

Some of us understand, and have for several years since Greenspan started using super-low interest rates to prop up and begin bailing out the economy. It's cost me thousands over six or eight years. But it's simple, conservative savers are being forced to finance part of the bailout of high risk investors and stupid government policies.

If this were more widely understood, the Tea Party movement would be bigger and people more PO'd, with 100% justification.

2 posted on 12/26/2009 5:11:34 AM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
"Many have seen returns on savings, C.D.’s and government bonds drop to niggling amounts recently..."

Niggling? That's racist!

3 posted on 12/26/2009 5:37:13 AM PST by Fetid Facts (Under Democrats, "The law is a ass--a idiot.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fetid Facts

That’s what I say!


4 posted on 12/26/2009 6:00:39 AM PST by texanyankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
In at 3% (what the banks used to consider "fair" interest), and out at 6% (loan rate) used to be the banker's mantra.

At 1% the money is better under a matress at home. By the rule of 72, it would take 72 years for my money to double. Bankers - Go to hell! I'll take my money where it gets treated much better.
5 posted on 12/26/2009 6:18:22 AM PST by Issaquahking (Help Sarah Palin! go to - http://www.conservatives4palin.com - You know what to do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Issaquahking

“Bankers - Go to hell! I’ll take my money where it gets treated much better.”

The problem is not bankers. Banks are paying such low interest rates because (1) low demand from scared borrowers means the banks have no way to make a profit if they pay more for your savings, and (2) what little funds the banks do need they can get from the government at close to 0% (so paying more for your savings would screw their shareholders).

The problem is Obama’s government. It should stop lending to banks at such low rates, and it should stop scaring borrowers with its march to Marxism. Sometime after the 2010 elections is probably the earliest we can hope the government will do either of those things (and only then if we work out tails off to get as many Democrats as possible out of office).

As for your resolve to take your “money where it gets treated much better,” I applaud the sentiment, but exactly where will it get treated much better? At Bernie Madoff’s place?


6 posted on 12/26/2009 6:41:29 AM PST by olrtex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: olrtex
As for your resolve to take your “money where it gets treated much better,” I applaud the sentiment, but exactly where will it get treated much better? At Bernie Madoff’s place?

Bernie is the kind of guy that should have been strung up and thrown to the street. Anytime you hire (as in put your money under their control) a broker - you need to do a thorough vetting process. For those of us who trust ourselves - there's Scottrade and a bunch of other places to play the market from. I'm thinking Gold, and other commodities are looking pretty good.

The problem is not bankers.

It's a lot deeper than that...All the way back to Carter and the CRA to start. Since the implosion of the residential, I fear the other shoe dropping in regard to the commercial end of the spectrum. Vegas has gone from $3.00+ to less than a $1.00 a square foot in some places for retail outlets as they stand empty. Don't see it getting any better till we get the dems and rinos gone in November of 2010....Providing we can hold the country together through the current storm to get there.

Watch who Sarah Palin gets behind, it's a good bet!
7 posted on 12/26/2009 9:44:24 AM PST by Issaquahking (Help Sarah Palin! go to - http://www.conservatives4palin.com - You know what to do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Fetid Facts
Niggling? That's racist!

Only if used by a conservative or in a conservative publication. See also: dissent.

8 posted on 12/26/2009 10:50:00 AM PST by KarinG1 (Merry Christmas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson