Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is the first shoe to drop. Quo warranto case is expected to follow shortly, perhaps this week, in DC.

This story was an exclusive to the Post & Email. MSM has not picked up on this yet.

1 posted on 12/28/2009 7:38:29 AM PST by circumbendibus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: circumbendibus
MSM Fringe Media has not picked up on this yet.
2 posted on 12/28/2009 7:41:59 AM PST by bmwcyle (Free the Navy Seals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Danae; rxsid; Seizethecarp; STARWISE; pissant

PING!!!


3 posted on 12/28/2009 7:42:49 AM PST by circumbendibus (Where's the Birth Certificate? Quo Warranto in 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: circumbendibus

I would rather see the secured debtholders in court against Obama and Chrysler.

Unfortunately, they were forced (nearly at gunpoint) to sign their rights away.


4 posted on 12/28/2009 7:49:58 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: circumbendibus
This story was an exclusive to the Post & Email. MSM has not picked up on this yet.

The MSM will never pick up on this, the legal fight for a Writ of Quo Warranto in the DC Federal Court, nor the cases proceeding in Hawaii to force the Hawaiian DOH to follow Hawaiian law, and release the documentation surrounding BHO's birth.

In fact, I haven't even seen a trace in the WSJ, where the Chrysler deal belongs!

5 posted on 12/28/2009 7:50:13 AM PST by Kenny Bunk (Just because they are the "Stupid" Party, doesn't mean they can't be evil, too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: circumbendibus

bump


8 posted on 12/28/2009 8:07:11 AM PST by smokingfrog (Don't mess with the mocking bird! - http://tiny.cc/freepthis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: circumbendibus

Wouldn’t it be great; if they could get Obama and Co while they were in Hawaii?


11 posted on 12/28/2009 8:33:52 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: circumbendibus
Per D’Onofrio filing:

“Before turning to our legal analysis of the elements necessary to establish fraud on the Court under FRCP Rule 60(d)(3), we should state that Movants do not allege Judge Gonzalez intentionally perpetrated a fraud on the Court. Regardless, we respectfully submit that the assertion wielded by Judge Gonzalez in Footnote 21 is fraudulent on its face and as such it exhibits a reckless disregard for the truth which is enough under controlling precedent to establish fraud on the court under Rule 60(d)(3).”

Wow! Professional gambler D’Onofrio is accusing the judge of committing a “fraud on the court” via “reckless disregard of the truth”.

Normally, as Taitz has found, it is not advisable to both insult and enrage the judge that you are asking to make a ruling a your motion. D’Onofrio is too smart for that, so I suspect that he may have deliberately put the judge in a conflict of interest position where the judge will need to recuse himself.

Judges must avoid even the appearance of conflict of interst, and if the judge rules against D’Onofrio’s client he could be seen as protecting his self-interest in his reputation. If he rules for D’Onofrio’s client, he will be admitting to having perpetrated a fraud on his own court!

I expect (not a lawyer) that the judge might feel compelled to recuse himself for this reason and that is what D’Onofrio intended. A new judge, not under the excruciating time pressure of the first judge and able to weigh with more time D’Onofrio’s arguments, might rule for D’Onofrio’s plaintiffs. I would be interested in how a lawyer thinks the judge will respond.

15 posted on 12/28/2009 1:16:05 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: circumbendibus

The Lord’s perfect timing..........


18 posted on 12/28/2009 2:21:08 PM PST by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson