Posted on 12/29/2009 3:50:31 PM PST by Stoat
Smart like rutabaga.
The kid? Where did you get the idea it was a kid. The article refers to him as a man. Your take on this astounds me.
Did the marine push the man, or did the man back away because he didn’t want to give up the clipboard? I still marvel at your ability to interpret this in the most favorable light for the person who took the clipboard. You find the marine at fault, and the man just being taken advantage of at that point.
What more can I say? Perhaps the marine should have said, “Hey... like I’m sorry I challenged you... can I please have my clipboard back? Please forgive me will ya. I was so out of line to challenge you once the alarm went off.” Good grief.
Once the man took the clipboard, he was at fault. Once he accosted the employee rather than comply, he was the guilty party.
What do you think the job of the greeter is, if an alarm goes off when a person exits? Of course the guy is going to ask the customer to take a look. Big deal. One short look in the bag checked against the receipt and the customer would be on his way.
Instead he become physical. And taking that clipboard was assault. You cannot touch another person, period.
I work in a retail store that has those scanners and they go off all the time—many times when no one is even near them!
I will also tell you that Thom Mcan shoes set them off in other stores even if they are deactivated at the purchasing store. Something about the magnet they use...
So, no, the devices are not flawless, and at my company we have been told not to stop or pursue anyone who refuses to come back when they go off.
You of course are INCORRECT. In common law and statutory law (for some/many states) Merchant or Shopkeeper's Privilege is fairly well established and they may control you for short periods, assuming they have reasonable cause. It's not always black or white (giving myself wiggle room)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shopkeeper%27s_privilege
At some establishments those alarms do seem to have a lot of false negatives. Generally a short glance back at the staff will let you know if you need to stop or not. Generally they just wave you on.
Boy! You need to read what you write BEFORE you post. Whew!
That said, the younger man was at fault for grabbing the clipboard. At that point, charges MAY have been possible, as he only grabbed the clipboard.
The greeter (knowingly or deliberately) escalated the situation by
1) Following the man inside
2) Jumping the man and shoving the man into the pylon. At that point the greeter can have assault charges filed on him.
I have no idea of what was said, very likely it has some bearing.
The man then lands a glancing blow to the greeters head, (now it is assault) who in turn, struck the man hard enough “he would have been knocked out” Assault again.
I had hoped to avoid this comment -
If the man who grabbed the clipboard had a knife or gun, the greeter would be dead.
I don't know about you, but a minimum wage job is not worth my life, or even being injured.
The greeter could have (and I believe should have)
1) Stayed outside and waited for Security
2) Stayed outside and taken down the license number of the car - oops, that is his primary job, eh?
3) Calmly walked back inside and asked for his clipboard.
It is easy to get in a fight and get hurt, or hurt someone else.
It is even harder to be a MAN and try to deescalate the situation.
Like I said earlier, the greeter was likely an old school Marine.
And as a manager I would have canned him on the spot. Well, we would have to the office and in front of at least one witness, fired him for cause.
Not because of the customer, but I would not want to pay for a dead or injured employee, or even an injured (other) customer.
Two typos are enough for you to remark upon it?
You must be the busiest man on the internet. And the most important.
Why don’t you share the real reason you have a problem with my post?
Just plain silly. You know what you need to do? You need to read what you write and then decide if it even matters BEFORE you post. Your mother may have never told you this...but not every thought that springs into your head needs to be shared with others. If the best you can do is cry over two typos then you’ve already lost.
Of course, there's always the signs that are posted..."We reserve the right..."
I think I understand why jackibutterfly is stalking me and attempting to correct my posts. I hurt his feelings pretty badly with my brutal use of logic in another thread a few days ago. So my mistake that consisted of two typos was just the opportunity he was waiting for to pounce and secure victory. The sad thing is he’s been tracking me for days and just now got his opportunity.
Hey jack...since you and I are friends now, I think I’ll check every future post you make for grammar...since it is so important to you and all. Thanks for the lookout, friend. I’ll be sure and return the favor 6 fold.
I live Anchorage, AK. Alaska is not just a “Shall Issue” state, there is no permit requirement to carry a weapon concealed. None, period.
The only rational attitude I can have is that everyone I meet, talk to or interact with has in their possession the means to either kill me or injure me gravely. Period.
Robert Heinlein once famously said - "An armed society is a polite society." There have been several shootings here where an argument turned deadly because one or more of the folks involved were armed. The shooters went to jail of course, but that is little comfort to a widow.
I also carry and that is a termendous responsibility - both to my family and to other citizens here. Hence, the effort to ignore, walk away, deescalate as the rational response to childish or stupid behavior on the part of others.
At this stage, I guess we can agree to disagree. Good night.
Probably exactly what went down here.
Not exactly. Under Florida law the security alarm is sufficient probable cause to detain the party. FS 812.015(3) You may choose not to show the receipt but then you can be held pending arrival of the police.
The charges here are indeed for striking the greeter. And OMG, that's the local store.
Today's story is the perp is claiming self defense.
Not in Florida. The Legislature has deemed the alarm system to be sufficient probable cause to make the stop reasonable, not unreasonable. And if you did resist and could not prove a receipt for everything on your person, you’d face a first degree misdemeanor charge.
Where did I say resist? I have firmly stated, “not comply”.
I also indicated I routnely insure my receipt matches the contents of my purchase. Personal responsibility.
Probable cause for whom? A store proprietor or a peace officer?
Both. FS 812.015
(3)(a) A law enforcement officer, a merchant, a farmer, or a transit agency's employee or agent, who has probable cause to believe that a retail theft, farm theft, a transit fare evasion, or trespass, or unlawful use or attempted use of any antishoplifting or inventory control device countermeasure, has been committed by a person and, in the case of retail or farm theft, that the property can be recovered by taking the offender into custody may, for the purpose of attempting to effect such recovery or for prosecution, take the offender into custody and detain the offender in a reasonable manner for a reasonable length of time. In the case of a farmer, taking into custody shall be effectuated only on property owned or leased by the farmer. In the event the merchant, merchant's employee, farmer, or a transit agency's employee or agent takes the person into custody, a law enforcement officer shall be called to the scene immediately after the person has been taken into custody.[emphasis added]Note also in the definition part of that statute(b) The activation of an antishoplifting or inventory control device as a result of a person exiting an establishment or a protected area within an establishment shall constitute reasonable cause for the detention of the person so exiting by the owner or operator of the establishment or by an agent or employee of the owner or operator, provided sufficient notice has been posted to advise the patrons that such a device is being utilized. Each such detention shall be made only in a reasonable manner and only for a reasonable period of time sufficient for any inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the activation of the device.
(c) The taking into custody and detention by a law enforcement officer, merchant, merchant's employee, farmer, or a transit agency's employee or agent, if done in compliance with all the requirements of this subsection, shall not render such law enforcement officer, merchant, merchant's employee, farmer, or a transit agency's employee or agent, criminally or civilly liable for false arrest, false imprisonment, or unlawful detention.
(1)(h) "Antishoplifting or inventory control device" means a mechanism or other device designed and operated for the purpose of detecting the removal from a mercantile establishment or similar enclosure, or from a protected area within such an enclosure, of specially marked or tagged merchandise. The term includes any electronic or digital imaging or any video recording or other film used for security purposes and the cash register tape or other record made of the register receipt.thus, even a video tape of you doing something innocent yet suspicious looking is sufficient to stop you and you have little or no recourse.
Maybe because we're TIRED of being treated like criminals? Maybe because once the payment is received it's HIS property to do with as he sees fit?
Receipt checks are disgusting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.