Skip to comments.
Personhood is the biggest threat to the child-killing industry, and the abortionists know it
AIPNews.com ^
| December 30, 2009
Posted on 12/30/2009 10:32:33 AM PST by EternalVigilance
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: ColdWater
Her own quotes and life refute you.
21
posted on
12/30/2009 5:22:45 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
To: EternalVigilance
Virulently racist eugenicist Margaret Sanger was the one individual who more than anyone else opened the door to fifty million dead babies. Your defense of her is unbelievable. I didn't defend her. I merely stated the truth and you have not refuted the truth that I posted.
22
posted on
12/30/2009 5:23:32 PM PST
by
ColdWater
("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
To: EternalVigilance
Her own quotes and life refute you. Ok. Please provide a quote from MS about abortion. Thank you.
23
posted on
12/30/2009 5:25:05 PM PST
by
ColdWater
("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
To: EternalVigilance
I’d like to see the abortion battle won on the merits of humanity.
Should law grant ‘personhood’ to the unborn, the Left would ultimately find a way to legally justify the wanton killing of ‘persons’.
24
posted on
12/30/2009 5:34:23 PM PST
by
Gene Eric
(Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
To: Gene Eric
Children in the womb are already persons, no matter what fools may say.
And, unfortunately it is many of those now known as “conservative” and “pro-life” who admit this obvious truth and yet think that majorities or states can decide whether or not to kill these young people.
25
posted on
12/30/2009 6:18:54 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
To: EternalVigilance
26
posted on
12/30/2009 6:27:26 PM PST
by
JSDude1
(www.wethepeopleindiana.org (Tea Party Member-Proud), www.travishankins.com (R- IN 09 2010!))
To: ColdWater
Margaret Sanger and her organization began to be primary sponsors of abortion rights during her lifetime. But because she had associated herself with Adolph Hitler, praising him for his racial politics of eugenics, she changed the name of American Birth Control League to Planned Parenthood during WWII in order to disguise her racist past.[13] Today, her organization, Planned Parenthood, is still in the forefront of advocating abortion as a means of eliminating the unwanted and "unfit." Not only does the organization perform thousands abortions each year, it also receives 100's of millions of tax dollars each year through Federal and State Governments.[14] And rather than being in the forefront of a woman's right to choose, International Planned Parenthood is a primary advocate for the Chinese Government's policy of forcing women to have abortions against their will, and it also advocates for the sterilization of Third World non-Whites across the globe.[15] It seems that PP is "pro-choice" when trying to impress the U.S. media, but anti-choice in the actual implementation of its world-wide agenda. But has Planned Parenthood changed? It is significant to note that Planned Parenthood has never distanced itself from the vision and ideology of its founder. Successive presidents of the organization have praised her work, including Faye Wattleton, who said, "As we celebrate the 100th birthday of Margaret Sanger, our courageous leader, we should be very proud of what we are and what our mission is. It is a very grand mission; abortion is only the tip of the iceberg."
27
posted on
12/30/2009 6:28:32 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
To: JSDude1
28
posted on
12/30/2009 6:33:43 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
To: victim soul
29
posted on
12/30/2009 6:36:40 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
To: ohioWfan
30
posted on
12/30/2009 6:38:03 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
To: EternalVigilance; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; Conservative Vermont Vet; ...
31
posted on
12/30/2009 6:39:09 PM PST
by
narses
('in an odd way this is cheering news!'.)
To: Faith
32
posted on
12/30/2009 6:39:14 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
To: TonyRo76
33
posted on
12/30/2009 6:40:38 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
To: wagglebee
34
posted on
12/30/2009 6:45:26 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
To: EternalVigilance
That’s great! But I am in Indiana ;).
35
posted on
12/30/2009 6:48:22 PM PST
by
JSDude1
(www.wethepeopleindiana.org (Tea Party Member-Proud), www.travishankins.com (R- IN 09 2010!))
To: JSDude1
We need to protect all persons in IN too. :-)
36
posted on
12/30/2009 6:49:46 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
To: JSDude1
Equal rights for our posterity Because the stated ultimate purpose of the United States Constitution is "to secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our posterity," we recognize the personhood of all unborn children and their protection by the Fifth and the Fourteenth Amendments.
The right to life of all innocent persons, from fertilization to natural death, is God-given and unalienable. That is why we consider it to be a moral imperative to fully establish in law that Personhood is granted by our Creator to all human beings from the very beginning of their biological development.
For the principled man or woman, no compromise is possible concerning such a critical matter of life and death. We believe that violators of this supreme right, in words or actions, are unfit for any office of public trust, since any such violation constitutes the breaking of the oath of office and the ultimate destruction of the very basis of our liberty.
37
posted on
12/30/2009 6:53:28 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
To: EternalVigilance
This is wonderful news, but I am a bit leary of anything that adopts the enemy’s rhetoric.
The distinction between “person” and a “human being” is an invention of the lying left. This pseudo-distinction is not supported by logic or the constitution. I would prefer confronting the lie directly. Abortion is murder because it kills an innocent human being. Period.
“Person” is something that suggests adult characteristics that we describe as “personality”: sense of humor, physical prowess, intelligence, etc. The left snuck this little word in in order to highlight the obvious but superficial difference between a more developed child and an unborn child, whose personality is likewise undeveloped and besides, such as it is, cannot be apprehended by us. It is an ill-defined word.
I’d rather see a movement that condemns abortion regardless of whether a one munite old embryo is a “person”.
38
posted on
12/30/2009 6:57:46 PM PST
by
annalex
(http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
To: annalex
A person is a person, no matter how mature or developed.
And the Constitution of the United States specifically protects the lives of all innocent persons in the Fifth and the Fourteenth Amendments.
39
posted on
12/30/2009 7:00:54 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
To: EternalVigilance
OOPS! I thought the headline was referring to this:
personalism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson