Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jamese777

What proof did the court have that said BHO was eligible other than third-party hearsay? His book “Dreams of My Father” is increansingly becoming a work of fiction.

Besides, Wong v. Ark was decided before the Nationality Act of 1952 (repealed 1986)


33 posted on 12/31/2009 4:38:18 AM PST by bjorn14 (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil. Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: bjorn14

What proof did the court have that said BHO was eligible other than third-party hearsay? His book “Dreams of My Father” is increansingly becoming a work of fiction.

Besides, Wong v. Ark was decided before the Nationality Act of 1952 (repealed 1986)


In Ankeny v The Governor of Indiana the plaintiffs stipulated that Obama was born in Hawaii but based their argument of his ineligibility on the fact that his father was not a US citizen. Therefore no discovery concerning his birth certificate was necessary.
The original trial judge and the appellate court rejected that argument. The appellate court noted that President Chester A. Arthur’s father was born in Ireland, immigrated to Canada and then immigrated again to the US.


44 posted on 01/01/2010 1:50:47 PM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson