Skip to comments.Obama signs away your legal protections ( 0s JIHAD ON AMERICA?)
Posted on 01/01/2010 10:34:55 AM PST by Tigen
With the signing of an under-publicized amendment to Executive Order 12425, Barack Obama has fundamentally altered your constitutional rights. His actions are undermining your rights to protect personal privacy from a foreign internationalist police agency named Interpol. A one-paragraph executive order may seem inconsequential to many, but this action has far-reaching implications and threatens the sovereignty of America.
Obama's secretive executive order amended an order issued by President Reagan in 1983. Reagan's order recognized Interpol as an international organization and gave it privileges and immunities commonly extended to foreign diplomats. Reagan opened the door to allow Interpol to operate in partnership with the U.S. but with significant constitutional safeguards. Specifically, Interpol's property and assets remained subject to search and seizure by American law enforcement, and its archived records remained subject to public scrutiny under provisions of the Freedom of Information Act
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Obama is aligned with his brothers, the Muslims.
Cricket sounds down at the aCLU.
He is the “brown clown” who will ignite the fire .
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.
We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream.
It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same,
or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children
and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free."
President Ronald Reagan
Jake tapper says this is no big deal( BIG shocker there)
Jake sats, well yes this does mean a US Citizen would not have the protections offered under our constitution and yes INTERPOL and any Court( ICC) could refuse to show any files they have on a US Citizen
but that is no big deal
But not to worry, as jake points out
Though clearly the Executive Order does prohibit US law enforcement from searching and seizing INTERPOL records, officials say, those provisions can be waived by the president if need be.
WEll if it can be waived why sign it into policy?
The question is....
How many other Constitutional Rights has Zero stripped from American Society.
OK NOW I am really POED.
Terrorists get all of the Rights the U.S. Constitution offers....YET ZERO CAN SIGN AWAY OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND NO ONE EVEN PAYS ANY ATTENTION.
Zero does NOT have the authority to strip our Constitutional Rights...PERIOD.
......................the U.S. Constitution clearly states that it is the supreme law of our land, and allowing the ICC to supersede the U.S. Constitution violates America’s sovereignty................................
Ah Zer0 doesn’t care. That Constitution thingie is just a moving target!
We need to gear up for 2010 to undo what this “peacock” has done and possibly impeach Obama for violating his oath to protect and uphold the US Constitution.
Note that, if US citizens defend themselves against INTERPOL agents coming after them to arrest or detain them--things which if they weren't INTERPOL agents would be considered kidnapping, for example--the US citizens would likely be guilty of transgressing US laws.
I allege this EO is a high crime, punishable by impeachment and removal from office!
Waiting for the first application of “Castle Law” by a Texan on INTERPOL Gestapo Thugs.
There is more...see this link...
Of Executive Order and Trojan Horses
This is an issue that our elected leaders need to address formally and soon The Patriot Room has another post up that goes into the Interpol EO even more:
Further research: INTERPOL the only police authority entity exempt from S&S under 1945 Act
Two days ago I received some other leads from Nancy Jacques. Heres her take on this and it is a good one:
Obamas most recent move of amending Executive Order 12425 is only 1 piece of the puzzle. Its consistent with, and appears strongly connected to the legislation, DoD Directive, Rand Corp Report, and other information delineated below (notice HR 645 was introduced right after Obama was sworn in as President):
H.R. 645: National Emergency Centers Establishment Act introduced Jan 22 2009, In Committee
[Section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief & Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122) [62 pages].
This Act defines the emergency or natural disaster in which HR 645 can apply.]
DoD Directive 1404.10: DoD Civilian Expeditionary Workforce dated Jan 23, 2009
H.R. 675: TO AMEND TITLE 10, United States Code, to provide police officers, criminal investigators, and game law enforcement officers of the Department of Defense with authority to execute warrants, make arrests, and carry firearms. introduced Jan 26, 2009 (in committee)
RAND Corp Report: A Stability Police Force for the United States 2009 (full report heavily redacted)
It appears hes implementing the framework legislatively needed to take control of the American people very soon. Even though it may appear that the use of this civilian force will be used within the U.S. to protect us, it will certainly be used against those that this administration deems a risk to the U.S. as defined in the Homeland Security report identifying right-wing, military vets, etc. as a danger to the U.S.
I thought this issue wasn’t exactly new although perhaps this agreement with Interpol is.
I’ve been told that for years, one way the US has gotten around 4th amendment difficulties on domestic spying is to make pacts with foreign intelligence agencies (like Scotland Yard) for them to spy on our people for us (and perhaps we return the favor). In the meantime all the popular outcry is about direct spying and this gets no press.
Maybe I don’t understand it but what i THINK obama did was to make any information INTERPOL gathers here is USA inviolabe, those records are not accessible to any US Citizen charged by INTERPOL.
So INTERPOL acts from the USA Justice building offices and investigates a US Citizen which the International Court decides to have arrested.
Thanks to Obama that US Citizen does not have the protection under the 4th Amendment( or any part of our constitution, first, 10th etc) and would not be able to view the files from which the charges stem
OR, what if the Justice Dept gathered information on a US Citizen and ran down the hall to give the info to Interpol. That information again is shielded from any American’s eyes.
odumbo has moved faster than I would have thought possible to expose us.,
Where is the public outcry over this? This is very very scary. If I didn’t read it I wouldn’t believe it
Amazing that this stuff was all pushed through right after the marxist took office and NO ONE in MSM said a word.
Thanks for providing this info and hopefully this gets some attention
Would this somehow effect say our troops or even CIA or other people acting on behalf of the American People.
If some Interpol Country bring charges against an American Citizen, would this give them the authority to come in and arrest Americans on U.S.soil WITHOUT due process?
The unprecedented INTERPOL-United Nations Ministerial meeting which saw more than 60 ministers backing a plan to bring the enhanced role of police in peacekeeping and peacebuilding operations to the forefront of the international security agenda, the official opening of INTERPOLs Office of its Special Representative to the European Union and the new INTERPOL Regional Bureau in Yaoundé were just some of the key events for the worlds largest police organization in 2009.
The year also saw the launch of the first-ever INTERPOL passport, and the organization further strengthening its commitment to supporting each of its 188 member countries in combating all forms of transnational crime with INTERPOLs databases, tools and services now reaching more law enforcement officers in more locations than at any time in its history.
INTERPOL has signed co-operation agreements with the United Nations including related bodies such as UNESCO the International Criminal Court and regional authorities such as the European Central Bank, Organization of African Unity and Arab Interior Ministers Council.
Even if the US has an extradition agreement in place with a country in which US citizens might be taken, 0bambi's EO says, "No problemo!" if INTERPOL chooses not to extradite, or to deal with such US citizens in any manner whatsoever INTERPOL might choose.
This must, IMHO, be calculated to be used against US citizens for any purposes deemed counter to the 0bama administration.
International Criminal Court
Didn’t Bush refuse to sign an agreement to allow Americans to be subject to this World lynch mob.
I wonder if Zero has signed onto this Court in Secret?
I hate to say it, but the only way I see us getting out from under the weight of our debt to China is to tell them to pound sand...we don't owe them a damned thing...but thanks for helping TRY to move us into a one world government.
It will get ugly.
Correct .... and interpol gets diplomatic immunity for any crimes committed while apprehending them.
all scary info, LT
all of it.
Thanks to Obama that US Citizen does not have the protection under the 4th Amendmen
I guess they forgot about millions and millions that would exercise their rights of the 2nd amendment.
Anyone remember how the left went nuts over “Rendition” which involved OTHER countries giving the CIA permission to “use” their countries to imprison and interrogate actual terrorists?
It is now legal for “other countries” to do the same to us if someone decides any one of us is a “terrorist” or “criminal,” be it citizen, soldier, agent, cop, judge, or opposition party leader, and NOT A PEEP. Nada.
And people on other threads are wondering why the CIA has become a liberal stink tank.
NO ONE in our entire history has betrayed this country more in 200 years than bam has done in less than ONE.
We only have that right because we have refused, some under criminal penalty, to concede it. And we had better watch over our shoulders because confiscation is not ever far from this administration’s mind.
Could we somehow use a axelturf and turn this against them....like get Soros....?
Just how much confidence do you have that the elections of 2010 will be free and fair, to any extent? Or...even held? Things are happening in the country that were unconscionable (to most clear thinkers) mere months ago.
I concur ... the EO by Zero is impeachable as a treasonous offence
No he hasn't. He may be violating them, or making it easier to do so. But the rights come from The Creator, and are merely protected by the Constitution.
The Usurper can't alter or abolish them, he can only violate them, or allow others to do so.
Obama doesn’t have the AUTHORITY to “sign our constitutional rights away”, regardless of what that damn executive order says.
I’ve been preparing to see to it that we return America to the Republic we remember. I’ve worked for campaigns in the past and will do so again. I’ve been a poll watcher and will do it again. I’ve sponsored coffees/teas, cooked and worked at fundraisers, etc. We can all do our part to secure America. We still outnumber them by a long shot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.