Skip to comments.
Do Web readers value journalism enough to pay? (Dinosaur Media DeathWatchâ„¢)
Los Angeles Times ^
| January 1, 2010
| James Rainey
Posted on 01/01/2010 3:28:06 PM PST by abb
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
1
posted on
01/01/2010 3:28:10 PM PST
by
abb
To: 04-Bravo; aimhigh; andyandval; Arizona Carolyn; backhoe; Bahbah; bert; bilhosty; Caipirabob; ...
2
posted on
01/01/2010 3:28:40 PM PST
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: abb
Do Web readers value journalism enough to pay? Show us some honest journalism and we will let you know.
3
posted on
01/01/2010 3:29:35 PM PST
by
RJL
To: abb
4
posted on
01/01/2010 3:29:57 PM PST
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: RJL
Rainey can whine with the best of them. “We are OWED!!!”
5
posted on
01/01/2010 3:31:10 PM PST
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: abb
Only reason I read the LA Times, the NY Times and similar publications is to see what the official Democratic position is on something. If they go away, I’ll be forced to get it from Gibbs, Obama, Pelosi or Reid.
To: abb
Ain’t that the irony? Liberal Media panders to Liberals, and liberals respond in kind by not purchasing any product. The Liberal Solution? Make the government pay!
Say, how come liberals don’t support their own?
To: abb
At this point in history I would not give a journalist the sweat off my left testicle. The so called professional journalists in the US are biased and write with an agenda that applauds liberalism and vilifies the middle and the right. Do I value journalism enough to pay? No because journalists that write for today's papers are liars.
8
posted on
01/01/2010 3:35:55 PM PST
by
vetvetdoug
(FUBO, a fashion statement for conservatives.)
To: abb
Maybe we do, but if I had to pay for journalism my money would be headed to British journalists, not American partisan political operators. The domestic media still appear clueless as to the extent to which their credibility died in the last Presidential election.
So why shouldn't I support, say, the NY Times? Because its staff hates me and holds me in contempt, that's why, and they don't even try to hide the fact. Why on earth would I pay someone for that?
To: RJL
Show us some honest journalism and we will let you know. Big talk, not backed up with facts.
Look at how conservative papers are closing faster than liberal ones. Look at how the Bulletin has fared. ?Are things great in Boston now? Look at the low quality of amateur reporting. Amateur reporting said that Rush Limbaugh was dead and that photos of his corpse were being bought. HA! A press conference from a walking, talking corpse today!
It makes a convenient meme, but it's not true that a liberal slant is what is killing newspapers...American ambivalence toward in-depth reporting is a large part of it. But go on with the Dan-Rather-style fake-but-accurate belief if tyou want.
10
posted on
01/01/2010 3:40:31 PM PST
by
Gondring
(Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
To: Gondring
11
posted on
01/01/2010 3:42:55 PM PST
by
Reily
(overning)
To: abb
we might if what you were actually doing was journalism.
Since it is not even close to journalism the answer is NO.
12
posted on
01/01/2010 3:42:56 PM PST
by
Ouderkirk
(Democrats: the party of Slavery, Segregation, Sodomy and Sedition)
To: vetvetdoug
A professional journalist wouldn’t care about your genital perspiration, but you’re welcome to tell everyone about it on your blog. I’m sure you’ll get readers.
13
posted on
01/01/2010 3:43:13 PM PST
by
Gondring
(Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
To: Reily
Exactly. Just going conservative doesn’t do it.
14
posted on
01/01/2010 3:44:25 PM PST
by
Gondring
(Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
To: kittycatonline.com
Say, how come liberals don’t support their own?
Many of the liberals I know are very, very cheap when it comes to anyone but themselves. They will spend big bucks for their own toys, but when it comes to $10 toward a collection for someone they associate with, they just don't have the money that day. But they will express a wish that the person will be eligible for some state benefits.
So they won't gather together and buy extra copies of their favorite leftist ragsheets, but will "speak out" in favor of government subsidy. That's someone else's money, after all, right?
15
posted on
01/01/2010 3:45:35 PM PST
by
LostInBayport
(When the riders in the cart outnumber those pulling the cart, the cart stops moving. My back hurts.)
To: abb
Most of the information (?) in US papers these days is not worth paying for. It is on the internet the day before. The newspapers are now written by persons with an agenda. In addition the rarely know what they write about (unfortunately)
To: Ouderkirk
For all these years, “journalism” - whatever that is - have thought their practitioners got paid for what they wrote/spoke.
Wrong.
The only value they ever had was the monopoly on distribution of content.
And that’s all gone.
17
posted on
01/01/2010 3:46:24 PM PST
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: abb
PAY TO BE PROPAGANDIZED?
I DON’T THINK SO!!!!
18
posted on
01/01/2010 3:46:29 PM PST
by
Dick Bachert
(THE 2010 ELECTIONS ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT IN OUR LIFETIMES! BE THERE!!!)
To: kittycatonline.com
Remember all the hype about the Dixie Chicks and their record sales after ‘George-gate’?
Once liberal outrage died down they couldn’t be bothered to keep buying.
To: abb
There’s a long list of liberal rags that ain’t gonna make it if their business model is charging on the internet.
20
posted on
01/01/2010 3:53:47 PM PST
by
Rocky
(Obama's ego: The "I's" have it.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson