Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Mammogram Guidelines Issued ... Again
LifeScience.com via Yahoo News ^ | January 4, 2010 | Jeanna Bryner

Posted on 01/04/2010 11:58:06 PM PST by BAW

Breast cancer screening just got more confusing today, as two medical organizations announced annual mammograms should begin at age 40, and earlier for high-risk women. The recommendations contradict a recent advisory for less frequent screenings beginning at age 50, not 40.

The recommendations for less frequent mammograms, released in November, came from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, with panel experts saying they were responding to data showing routine mammograms starting at age 40 rarely saved lives and more often resulted in misdiagnoses that just fueled anxiety and debilitating treatment.

This new advice, which is published in the January issue of the Journal of the American College of Radiology, comes from the Society of Breast Imaging (SBI) and the American College of Radiology (ACR). And these groups suggest just the opposite - that the screening does save lives.

"The significant decrease in breast cancer mortality, which amounts to nearly 30 percent since 1990, is a major medical success and is due largely to earlier detection of breast cancer through mammography screening," said lead study author Dr. Carol H. Lee, a radiologist at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. "For women with the highest risk of developing breast cancer, screening technologies in addition to mammography have been adopted," said Lee, who is the chair of ACR's Breast Imaging Commission.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: healthcare; mammograms
This science, mammograms, saves lives. Don't listen to the government. Listen to the medical experts.
1 posted on 01/04/2010 11:58:07 PM PST by BAW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BAW

But with the gov’t taking over, the science will be based on the squeakiest wheels. Medical Policy is going to be determined by which special interest or minority screams the loudest.

It’s akin to claims of killing Big Bird every time someone wants to cut funding for PBS.

By the end, medicine will be governed by the same consensus as global warming. This is ridiculous.


2 posted on 01/05/2010 1:52:26 AM PST by Hessian (Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BAW

My husband’s two sisters, both in 40’s with annual mammograms and no family history, were diagnosed with breast cancer within 8 weeks of each other. The goverment can kiss my fanny.


3 posted on 01/05/2010 2:46:08 AM PST by melissa_in_ga (God Bless Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hessian
But with the gov’t taking over, the science will be based on the squeakiest wheels.

More $ for AIDs research!!!!

4 posted on 01/05/2010 2:53:07 AM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BAW
The American College of Radiologists can recommend whatever they want, but the American Preventive Services Task Force is the body that will be setting policy under Obamacare. The ACR can have all the science in the World on their side, but it just won't matter. The Not-A-Death-Panel has spoken, and their word is law.

And, just suppose that the American Preventive Services Task Force turns out to be unreasonable or tyrannical in their decrees... Well, thanks to the special rules (oh, excuse me, procedures) under the Reid Bill, Congress will not be able to do a damn thing about it. Any bill attempting to rein in this body will be declared Out of Order, in perpetuity, under the Reid Bill.

Nice, huh?

5 posted on 01/05/2010 3:12:08 AM PST by Haiku Guy ("I don't give them Hell / I tell the truth about them / And they think it's Hell" -- Harry Truman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hessian
I agree. Medical policy is going to be set by lobbyists and special pleadings. No doubt there will be a "Mammogram Fix" in the final version of this bill, to buy off the women's vote.

So medical policy will be a patchwork of whatever people manage to bribe or pressure through the process. Diseases of special victim groups will get special status and funding, and diseases that kill old white men will be promoted.

Ain't bureaucratic healthcare grand? It's not even here yet, and already the special favors and pleadings have begun. And our Political Betters in Washington will be able to shake us down by granting favorable access to our own damn money, in perpetuity.

Nice.

6 posted on 01/05/2010 3:22:50 AM PST by Haiku Guy ("I don't give them Hell / I tell the truth about them / And they think it's Hell" -- Harry Truman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BAW

7 posted on 01/05/2010 3:42:52 AM PST by Diogenesis ("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson