AP sources: Obama OKs taxing high-end health plans

Drudge Report ^ | 12/06/2010 | ERICA WERNER

[Oceander]

Hmmm, let’s see; gawrsh, you’re correct, there are so-o-o-o-o-o many so-called “moderates” and “independents” saying “oh, what am I going to do - I know, I’ll surf on over to freerepublic.com and then to democraticunderground.com, and then compare and contrast the positions and whitepapers I find there, and through the process of dialectic criticism, I will determine what to do.”

I don’t think I have a rolling-my-eyes smiley that’s big enough for that one. Get real, and get a clue.

[Oceander]

And, just because I like to keep a "good" conversation going, let's review some facts, shall we? First, here's a sample of the Democrats' graphics - and not just any graphics, this was considered good enough to run as part of a recent pro-Coakley ad:

Meanwhile, here's the only directly anti-Coakley pic I've come up with to date:

I guess I've got a bit of catching up to do, eh? Perhaps I should just photoshop her into this (GIMP, actually, I'm an open-source/freebie kinda guy, being unemployed and all, thanks to Dear Leader):

[Oceander]

Ok, just 'cause I like beating dead horsies, here's Coakley, suitably photoshopped (GIMPed) into the original pic you couldn't stand (which, I submit, is still pretty tame compared to what liberals/Democrats think constitutes reasoned discourse aimed at your so-called "moderates" and "independents" - I doubt the Democrats are trying to preach solely to the base in Mass. right now).

First, here's the photoshopped image itself - Coakley took Waxman's place (I can't stand that little worm anyways, so he won't be missed):

and, just to make sure you didn't miss her, here's a smaller copy, with a suitable blue "halo" highlighting Ms. Coakley:

How's them apples?