1. If it is a constitution REQUIREMENT for a President to be born in the U.S., then how exactly does Zero get by without demonstrating his fulfills it. Holy crap, I have to take a copy of my son's birth certificate to prove his age for each football season, so I don't see why this should be any more unreasonable.
2. I'm no constitutional lawyer, but if this is a government “by the people”, then why don't the people have standing in a case asking that its President demonstrate that he has met the requirement to hold that position?
First, it is not simply a matter of being born in the USA. The president must BE a Natural Born Citizen, ie born on US soil of 2 citizen parents. IF Obama Sr. is indeed his daddy, then he is NOT a NBC even if he was born in HI, per the laws at the alleged time of his birth.
2. I'm no constitutional lawyer, but if this is a government by the people, then why don't the people have standing in a case...
No need to be a constitutional lawyer to know we certainly do have standing. See the reference to SCOTUS and the picture posted above.