Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rxsid; Seizethecarp

here we go...

The Blaine Document
October 19, 2009 by John Charlton

WILLIAM BLAINE RELEASES PURPORTED OBAMA CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH
by John Charlton

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2366539/posts?page=161#161


71 posted on 01/08/2010 9:38:28 PM PST by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2366539/posts?page=164#164

http://lawyers.legalhelpmate.com/OH-Lawyer-William-Blaine-88782.aspx


72 posted on 01/08/2010 9:46:28 PM PST by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: Fred Nerks; rxsid; LucyT
Thanks Fred! You beat me to it! William Blaine in Ohio, that's the alleged source.

The good news is that it is in the hands of John Charlton who is currently wired directly into D'Onofrio (back together after a big dust-up for which D'Onofrio apologized). D'Onofrio and the Chrysler dealers may have access to a copy of this document as backup for their quo warranto discovery effort, depending on the degree to which Blaine can provide provenance.

In the Post & E-Mail story at the link (below) is a statement from Kerchner that he and Apuzzo believe this is a hoax, but they appear to fail to understand that bureaucrats can fish a document out of the file long after it is placed in the file to add statutory notations, such as the one for the 1982 statute.

And there is a clear reason for this notation being added after 1982 as a footnote to the Honolulu "birth location" to clarify that the actual birth hospital was in Kenya, per the hospital field entry.

From the link to the story at your link:

http://thepostnemail.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/the-blaine-document/

Commander Charles Kerchner, issued this statement:

"Atty Mario Apuzzo and I believe it is a forgery and a fraud … probably done by some Obot to get our side scurrying around with it. The biggest reason we think it is a fraud is because the Hawaiian statute cited in the lower right corner as the version with the “.8″ amendment on the end, i.e., 338.17.8 did not exist in 1961. It was added to the statute in 1982. That jumped out at me right away. 338.17.8 did not apply to Obama in 1961 because it did not exist in the law books yet. But the registration of out of state children was permitted in 1961 under older laws such as the one in 1911 and another in 1955, as I recall off the top of my head. But since this doc is citing 338.17.8 it cannot be the initial or original birth registration document."

73 posted on 01/08/2010 10:07:33 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: Fred Nerks

Perhaps this has already been discussed, but, if so, I missed it:

I find it very interesting that the purported source of this document is named “Blaine,” which is also the middle name of one of those who signed it.

Relatives? Could the signatory still be alive and have access to the original?

Long shot, but very interesting.


99 posted on 01/09/2010 10:58:21 AM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson