Posted on 01/08/2010 7:01:46 PM PST by Man50D
An attorney who has been involved in several high-profile cases alleging that Barack Obama isn't qualified to be president because he is not a "natural born citizen" as demanded by the Constitution now is asking a California judge in investigate possible fraud against the court.
Orly Taitz, who has, among other cases, one pending at the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on behalf of a member of the military wondering whether orders from Obama as commander-in-chief are valid, said the possibility of fraud is one of several concerns in the case.
"There is such a high probability of criminal acts of identity theft and Social Security fraud committed by the respondent that the undersigned requests this honorable court to use its inherent powers to order Sua Sponte an evidentiary hearing on this particular issue for possible criminal prosecution," she wrote in her latest arguments that also request the case be moved to Washington, D.C.
She noted the respondent, Obama, "has submitted himself to the jurisdiction of this honorable court and can be brought to a separate evidentiary hearing to ascertain if fraud was perpetrated upon the court by assertion of false identity, even if the underlying case is not heard or closed for one reason or another."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Such a silly woman.
I wonder how she will look back on this in another decade.
Keep playing with your TV clicker so reality does not intrude into your little world.
She will still be enjoying the millions she will have made on this case and as a lawyer, she will move on. Lawyers have that ability … to just move on.
Well, at least she’s trying to do something; and I’ll give her this: there’s a _LOT_ about Obama that just doesn’t ‘smell right.’ Certainly some of that is due the opaqueness and ‘closedness’ of his records; I myself have had to produce more records for review for enlistment then it seems he has had to obtain the presidency (and my reviewers can be easily tracked with my old enlistment contract) whereas those certifying Obama merely say “he’s certified” and don’t put their money where their mouth is, so to speak, and sign their names to that.
IOW, it’s like the rail-union rep in Atlas Shrugged who tries to get a stranglehold over both Ms Taggart & her employees by forbidding any of them to operate on her newly-constructed John Galt line. {When she offers to draw up a contract binding the union to NEVER operating on the line he backs down.} We have the same thing: everyone says “oh he’s qualified” about Obama, but it seems that nobody’s willing to sign [in blood] on the dotted line.
Only took five minutes for the obamanoid infestation to show up ... I’ve lost my taste for popcorn due to the stench rising.
Any dead fish can float downstream. Dr. Taitz (using her own money and donations) is very courageous to pursue the truth against the DOJ (using taxpayer money) and the Democrats who qualified Obama even though they knew he was not eligible. Why do you think he refuses to release all his records and pays $2 mil to keep them that way?
The judges are all too scared to fight the Government which is now owned by tyrants who hide in secret rooms to turn America into the United Socialist States of Amerikka. See PierreLegrand.net and watch Larry Grathwohl who infiltrated the Weather Underground and tells their plans for us. See the Obama Timeline at Colony14.net and references. The truth will come out. I hope it will not be too late.
bump
I am willing to bet all the money that the shyster birther lawyers have swindled out of good, honest, law-abiding citizens.
I just checked your prior posts.
They are almost all defending Obama not showing his birth certificate.
You must be a troll assigned to challenge others.
SILLY WOMAN??
Have you thought about how to help Orly as opposed to calling her a silly woman?
What planet are you from pal?
Real world: Taitz is zero and all on every unhinged effort she’s made.
This isn’t going to change.
That’s reality.
Millions?
How’s she going to manage that? Especially with the 20K fine hanging over her head.
Wait! I get it... The underpants gnome method.
1) File irrational lawsuits and get slapped with fines.
2) ?
3) Profit!
Trying to do something and achieving entirely counterproductive results isn’t something to be admired or encouraged.
Dang, and I’ve even tried a new soap...
What has Taitz actually managed to accomplish?
The help Orly needs is chiefly psychiatric.
And I’m from Earth.
I come in peace.
ping...
I wonder if Orly’s new associate helped her come up with this. Not being a lawyer I have no idea whether Judge Carter even has any plenary power to reopen this case, which seems to have been closed with prejudice, pending appeal.
I make sarcastic comments on other topics too you know...
Just put her name in your metal rolodex and watch what happens.
She is right but ridiculed.
I pray that God will raise up good and capable men and women with the talent and resources to expose Obama and his minions. May He also confound, confuse,befuddle, and blind Obama’s men and lawyers so that they make many mistakes.
Its about 10 defending Obama to one other post.
Its obvious your postings are for the purpose of defending Zero.
Once in a while something else catches your eye.
It is clear you are a Zero Troll.
Tell you what, I’ll go on record about what is going to happen.
1) This latest filing will go nowhere.
2) Taitz’s future filings on this matter will go nowhere.
3) Taitz will be fined again before the year is out.
4) Taitz will be sentenced to jail time for failure to pay the fine(s).
5) Disbarment before the end of 2011.
Now, maybe I am right. Maybe I am wrong. But given her track record, this is certainly the way to bet.
Why stop there...she's
CASSANDRA!
Mmmmhmmmm.
Here’s something for you to consider.
Advocating rational behavior, critical thinking and rule of law does not equate to support of any particular politician.
Nor does the failure to join the reflexive hate and denouncement of someone infer support of them.
And making fun of silly people doesn’t mean you are a grand admirer of the silly person’s target of hostility.
Think about that.
Something for you to think about....why do you and others who disagree with this subject come on these threads? Do you believe that you will change anyone’s mind? You won’t. I don’t understand posters propensity to haunt these threads when they disagree.
I want to add two final predictions to that list.
6) When the entirely predictable comes to pass (items 1-5) there will be ‘birthers’ loudly decrying each step as further evidence that the judiciary is thoroughly corrupted and under BHO’s thumb.
7) When the next Republican is elected (in 2012, Lord willing) and the denizens of DU try these same stunts, some of the very same people who call themselves ‘birthers’ and agitate most loudly here will immediately reverse their positions regarding the role of the judiciary, rules of evidence, court procedures, the results of elections and the Executive branch.
I know full well that I won’t change the minds of many, if any at all.
The hardcore birthers believe as they do because their views fulfill an emotional need. You cannot effectively through argument change the mind of a person who hold a view for emotional reasons. They have to work through it in their own time, if they ever do so.
Nevertheless, there are always individuals encountering this issue or aspects of it for the first time. And I do not wish to leave FreeRepublic to be an echo chamber of birther silliness.
That and silliness deserves to be mocked. At least a little bit.
Your soap selection? ... you chose poorly.
Um, the owner of this site also thinks that there is a problem with Obamas eligibility. I was on a thread with him when he zotted someone for challenging his opinion.
Then I disagree with him on that matter.
JR doesn’t ban people for simple disagreements.
If he zotted (that word really should be in the spellchecker) someone, I am sure he had a much better reason than them spouting a contrary opinion.
Dr. Taitz is keeping the heat on Obama, Pelosi, Leahy, McCaskill, etc. to prove he is eligible, and the possibility exists that the publicity will cause a whistleblower to have the courage to expose him. Several judges now are aware of Obama’s many social security numbers and that the one he uses now belongs to someone else. These numbers/aliases may be related to fraud, Rezko and the fact that a judge in Chicago revoked Michelle’s law license.
When Obama filed for his lawyer’s license he committed a felony by not putting down AKA Barry Soetoro. Orly is giving ulcers to the DOJ lawyers trying to stop investigations. They’re scared, too.
Are you aware that no alumni of Columbia remember him? Did you know Bill Ayers wrote parts of Obama’s books? Have you read Newsmax.com by Ken Timmerman “Obama had close ties to Top Saudi Adviser at Early Age” Sep. 3, 2008? Read it. They got him into Harvard.
Ah-ha! I misread the packaging.
It was actually soup.
That explains a lot.
Now maybe the cats will stop licking me so much.
Not usually. He's a very reasonable man.
I am sure he had a much better reason than them spouting a contrary opinion.
Not really. This poster kept insisting that the subject was foolish and he'd had enough. They were a 97 or 98 signup so I was surprised.
I believe there was a recent thread he posted where he said he wouldn’t put up with RINO defenders on FR either. I was glad to see that.
He worked for Clinton in Arkansas and had a lot of first hand information on the dirty dealings the Clintons were involved in.
I used to listen to radio interviews of the guy all during the Clinton years and he was always a week or ten days from some sort of indictment, or some new charges that would bring down the administration. The longer it went on, the nuttier the guy became.
And I'm sure you remember Juanita Broderick. A major network let her tell her very credible story of how Bill Clinton raped her. And I remember several congressmen being horrified by what they read in the Starr report.
He was impeached, and even with a Republican majority in the house and senate, the senate didn't want anything to do with it. Not enough Republicans voted to have him removed, so he remained in office.
Now with a large Democratic majority in both houses, do you honestly believe that this senseless pursuit has a prayer of success?
I’m not so sure about #4...
Guess Jim is too bothered by the dollars and health problems to ban this libtard.
Best wishes Jim.
It is very apparent that you are a cheerleader for Zero.
I wonder what social security number Obama used while he worked at Baskin Robbin's ice cream shop in Hawaii? Was it the one from Connecticut?
We don’t know his schools, much less his grades.
Reportedly he is “brilliant”. OK, what’s his IQ.
Can we trace his life; where he grew up. Like all Presidents, isn’t their family house an heirloom, like
the “log cabin”. Can’t we have a timeline of his life.
Of course, part of the problem, is that “natural born”
has not been rigorously, legally defined—or has it?
Yes, a prayer may be all this “senseless pursuit” (as you call it) needs. Why not try it? Plus, he has signed an EO to release classified info, see blogger atlas shrugs report at FR, 1/9/10 at 4:59 PM by sushiman. It might do him in. Plus, one more terror attack might do it. Putting INTERPOL above the Constitution could be another nail in his coffin.
A natural disaster he can’t fund would hurt him, and a 6.5 earthquake just hit 250 miles N of San Francisco. Don’t despair. He is a fraud and will be found out.
bttt
http://ia301521.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.cacd.435591/gov.uscourts.cacd.435591.107.0.pdf
...in the name of the United States of America are requesting this Honorable Court to issue a writ of Quo Warranto against a respondent Barack Hussein Obama and order an evidentiary hearing whether fraud upon the court was committed and whether criminal charges should be brought against the respondent for fraud, identity theft and social security fraud.
using Orly's Connecticut social security number for Obama, freeper supremedoctrine was able to pull up a registered draft registration number under Obama. (Post # 111)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.