Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man tests right by carrying gun in public(CA)
bakersfieldnow.com ^ | 11 January, 2010 | Betsy Lambert

Posted on 01/12/2010 4:15:07 AM PST by marktwain

BAKERSFIELD, Calif. -- A Kern County man is testing his Second Amendment right to bear arms.

Rafael Esqueda said he has been visiting different public places over the past week with his gun on his belt.

"We can openly carry in California," he said. "The firearm has to be unloaded in plain view, and the magazine, which is an integral part of the firearm, have to be exposed, also."

In an effort to promote his platform, he, and about four of his friends, all showed up at River Walk Park on Sunday afternoon with their guns exposed. Eyewitness News was there to capture reactions from parkgoers and the event that was to follow.

One family who was at the park fishing with children and grandchildren said they didn't feel comfortable with the guns out. Sandra Cantu is a grandmother and thought what Esqueda was doing was not right.

"I have a lot of grandkids, and I wouldn't want them to do that," she said. "It's showing a mixed message that they could carry them."

About 20 minutes after Esqueda arrived, Bakersfield police arrived and informed him that it was against city code to carry guns in a city park. Esqueda complied and told Eyewitness News that he "learned something new."

He went onto say, "No problems, no arrest, nobody got shot or murdered."

(Excerpt) Read more at bakersfieldnow.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: banglist; ca; gun; opencarry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Slehn
My point is that California is wrong and concealed carry is preferrable and more effective than open.

When I'm working out in the woods with wild pigs, mountain lions, and coyotes around, open carry is the way to go. Unfortunately, when I get to the county road to walk home, it does tend to spook the urban transplants.

41 posted on 01/12/2010 7:58:33 AM PST by Carry_Okie (The Democrats were the Slave Party then; they are the Slave Party now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: kickonly88

the magazine was not in the gun but could easily be injected... if needed.

that’s how i read the article.

t


42 posted on 01/12/2010 8:35:24 AM PST by teeman8r (i liked GWB... really, i did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

>>>The whole point of the open carry movement is to inoculate the “nervous Nellies” so as to have them NOT see someone openly carrying a gun as “scary”.

Yes, but nervous Nellies often react by passing more laws. For example, here in Charlotte, a couple of reports of young African American males walking around downtown openly carrying a handgun (which is not against the law), caused the police chief to push for a new city ordinance that would make open display of a firearm illegal. It didn’t get past that city council, but there was the potential that it might.


43 posted on 01/12/2010 8:44:49 AM PST by NC28203
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: NC28203
"Yes, but nervous Nellies often react by passing more laws."

If they can stir up enough hoopla to get the law passed at the first incident, yes. But longer term, education and exposure can lead to BETTER laws and not worse ones. As evidence, we can see the ongoing growth of CCW rights as one state after another passes CCW, with zero negative consequences. Even the diehard blowhard liberal states are finally "getting the picture" that it is not GUNS that is the problem, it is CRIMINALS.

44 posted on 01/12/2010 9:18:02 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
What is the point of carrying an unloaded weapon? ... Ask the California politicians who created the asinine California gun laws in the first place.

I believe it was in the late 60's when Ronald Reagan signed the bill which banned the carrying of loaded weapons in California. (I don't recall the act's name). But, it was Reagan.

45 posted on 01/12/2010 10:00:53 AM PST by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: mvpel

The law was passed in the 60’s or 70’s (forget which) after the black panthers staged an armed march on the capital in Sacramento. Scared the pee out of all those whities in the legislature so they hurried up and passed this stupid law. Really no point of carrying in California anyway (concealed or open) since you have a duty to retreat here and the use of deadly force is frowned upon.

As an interesting aside, I used to live in downtown Long Beach in a transitional neighborhood (i.e., just blocks from the hood). My roommate used to go jogging after work at night and would always carry concealed a Sig in a fanny pack. He got jumped by three black guys, pulled out his gun and shot one of them. Surprisingly the cops did not even arrest him and he got his gun back a few days later (this was about 20 years ago though so attitudes have changed). He did not have a license to carry but figured better judged by 12 than carried by 6.


46 posted on 01/12/2010 4:45:54 PM PST by trapped_in_LA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson