Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Stability Police Force for the United States: RAND CORP CALLS FOR NATIONAL POLICE FORCE???
RAND COPORATION ^ | 2009 | By: Terrence K. Kelly, Seth G. Jones, James E. Barnett, Keith Crane, Robert C. Davis, Carl Jensen

Posted on 01/12/2010 6:29:19 AM PST by RaceBannon

I know someone who purchased this from RAND.

By page 19 this report goes from discussing the need for a Special Police Force overseas to supplement interventions, to suddenly needing a force that can circumvent Posse Comitatus.

Posse Comitatus exists for a reason and any attempt to circumvent it, not matter how nicely packaged, is a step on the way to "Special" police becoming "Secret" police.

They call it :A STABILITY POLICE FORCE: This study asks several questions. First, is a Stability Police Force (SPF) necessary? An SPF is a high-end police force that engages in a range of tasks such as crowd and riot control, special weapons and tactics (SWAT), and investigations of organized criminal groups. In its ability to operate in stability operations, it is similar to such European forces as the Italian Carabinieri and French Gendarmerie. Its focus on highend tasks makes it fundamentally different from UN or other civilian police, who deal with more routine law and order functions. It is also different from most military forces, which are generally not trained and experienced to conduct policing tasks in a civilian environment. Second, if an SPF is necessary, what should it look like? This includes considering such issues as: its objectives, tasks, and size; its speed of deployment; its institutional capabilities; where it should be headquartered in the U.S. government and how it should be staffed (standing force, reserve force, and hybrid force); and its cost.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2010; america2point0; asocialistamerica; banglist; bhofascism; bhotyranny; bloat; civilwar2; civilwarii; constitution; corruption; cultureofcorruption; cwii; cwiiping; democrats; democratscandals; dncbrownshirts; donttreadonme; gendarmerie; gestapo; itcanhappenhere; january; kgb; liberalfascism; nationalpoliceforce; nazis; nkvd; obamapolice; obamunism; policestate; possecomitatus; rand; randcorp; secretpolice; sorosbrownshirts; spf; stabilitypoliceforce; stassi; tyranny; unconstitutional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-303 next last
Chapter One: Introduction

Chapter Two: Objectives and Tasks

Chapter Three: Size and Speed of Deployment

Chapter Four: Institutional Capabilities

Chapter Five: Which Agency Should Create and Maintain an SPF?

Chapter Six: Staffing: Standing or Reserve?

Chapter Seven: Costing

Chapter Eight: Conclusions

Appendix: Other Headquarters Options

1 posted on 01/12/2010 6:29:22 AM PST by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

2 posted on 01/12/2010 6:32:08 AM PST by Huck (The Constitution is an outrageous insult to the men who fought the Revolution." -Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: Grunthor

SPF = Tea Party control


4 posted on 01/12/2010 6:34:32 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

We already have one - or should. Read the Second Amendment!

Does the Rand Corporation want to make sure more Americans own personal firearms? :)


5 posted on 01/12/2010 6:34:54 AM PST by cvq3842 (A fool and his liberty are soon parted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

“First, is a Stability Police Force (SPF) necessary?”
Well hell yes, when the great zero declares martial law to retain power.


6 posted on 01/12/2010 6:35:36 AM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

NO NO NO and HELL NO

Unless Sarah Palin becomes President (that ought to shut up the libs who think this is kewl)


7 posted on 01/12/2010 6:35:57 AM PST by silverleaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Rand Corp, Brookings Inst = commie, pinko “think tanks”


8 posted on 01/12/2010 6:35:58 AM PST by matginzac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Oh goody, and American gendarmerie. Uh, no thanks.


9 posted on 01/12/2010 6:37:22 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor; 2111USMC; 2nd Bn, 11th Mar; 68 grunt; A.A. Cunningham; ASOC; AirForceBrat23; Ajnin; ...

A Stability Police Force for the United States
Justification and Options for Creating U.S. Capabilities

By: Terrence K. Kelly, Seth G. Jones, James E. Barnett, Keith Crane, Robert C. Davis, Carl Jensen

Establishing security is the sine qua non of stability operations, since it is a prerequisite for reconstruction and development. Security requires a mix of military and police forces to deal with a range of threats from insurgents to criminal organizations. This research examines the creation of a high-end police force, which the authors call a Stability Police Force (SPF). The study considers what size force is necessary, how responsive it needs to be, where in the government it might be located, what capabilities it should have, how it could be staffed, and its cost. This monograph also considers several options for locating this force within the U.S. government, including the U.S. Marshals Service, the U.S. Secret Service, the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) in the Department of State, and the U.S. Army’s Military Police. The authors conclude that an SPF containing 6,000 people — created in the U.S. Marshals Service and staffed by a “hybrid option,” in which SPF members are federal police officers seconded to federal, state, and local police agencies when not deployed — would be the most effective of the options considered. The SPF would be able to deploy in 30 days. The cost for this option would be $637.3 million annually, in FY2007 dollars.

http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG819/


10 posted on 01/12/2010 6:37:22 AM PST by RaceBannon (OBAMA'S HEALTH CARE IS SHOVEL READY...FOR SENIORS!!:: NObama. Not my president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor
>>What do you think is going to happen when the white man riots?

The Clash - White Riot

White riot - I wanna riot
White riot - a riot of my own
White riot - I wanna riot
White riot - a riot of my own

Black man gotta lot a problems
But they don't mind throwing a brick
White people go to school
Where they teach you how to be thick

An' everybody's doing
Just what they're told to
An' nobody wants
To go to jail!

White riot - I wanna riot
White riot - a riot of my own
White riot - I wanna riot
White riot - a riot of my own
All the power's in the hands
Of people rich enough to buy it

While we walk the street
Too chicken to even try it

Everybody's doing
Just what they're told to
Nobody wants
To go to jail!

White riot - I wanna riot
White riot - a riot of my own
White riot - I wanna riot
White riot - a riot of my own

Are you taking over
or are you taking orders?
Are you going backwards
Or are you going forwards?

White riot - I wanna riot
White riot - a riot of my own
White riot - I wanna riot
White riot - a riot of my own

11 posted on 01/12/2010 6:37:44 AM PST by FreedomPoster (No Representation without Taxation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

12 posted on 01/12/2010 6:37:55 AM PST by Vaquero (BHO....'The Pretenda from Kenya')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

Yes, the elites are seeing the makings of guillotines and decorated lamp posts if they don’t get some sort of opposing force in place and quick.


13 posted on 01/12/2010 6:38:04 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

1) INTERPOL can operate in the US and is not bound by the US Constitution.
2) Obama signed an executive order establishing a Council of Governors with scary powers.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2426271/posts
3) We’re moving toward a national police force.

Put it all together — the Clampdown’s coming this year.


14 posted on 01/12/2010 6:38:04 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (We have the 1st so that we can call on people to rebel. We have 2nd so that they can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2402499/posts


15 posted on 01/12/2010 6:38:13 AM PST by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; Jack Black

So who is funding these studies?

CWII ping?


16 posted on 01/12/2010 6:39:01 AM PST by FreedomPoster (No Representation without Taxation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; Bender2; Allegra

Ping


17 posted on 01/12/2010 6:39:04 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

It’s the show ‘Jericho’ coming to life.


18 posted on 01/12/2010 6:39:43 AM PST by rintense (You do not advance conservatism by becoming more liberal. ~ rintense, 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Got it and will give it a read...


19 posted on 01/12/2010 6:39:52 AM PST by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

SPF??? Sounds like a 2010 version of the old GESTAPO!!!!


20 posted on 01/12/2010 6:40:16 AM PST by RdhseRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-303 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson