Skip to comments.Obama’s Presidential Eligibility Scandal?
Posted on 01/12/2010 8:55:40 PM PST by circumbendibus
Did Hope for Rising GOP Stars like Bobby Jindal Play a Role in the Obamas Presidential Eligibility Scandal?
When questions about Obamas eligibility to serve as President arose, I immediately recognized that this could be the biggest political scandal in U.S. history, bigger even than Watergate. The allegations, if true, would have created widespread political turmoil and would have had to involve people, high up people, ignoring and/or covering up facts. How could a young Senator from Illinois have gotten so far, so quickly, in national politics without some in both the Democratic & Republican Parties taking notice, researching, discovering details of his past and recognizing that there was a BIG potential problem? Especially, given that every other person in Washington is a lawyer, people knew, the media had to have known, known both of the problem and its ramifications. After all, its the political big league in Washington.
Having a legal background, I decided to do my own research to satisfy my curiosity and it became abundantly clear that legitimate questions existed and continue to exist. Questions regarding interpretation of Article II, Section I of the Constitution, questions of original intent, British/Kenyan law, acquisition of citizenship, questions about Obamas birthplace, his adoption, his educational scholarships, his parents foreign allegiance/citizenship, his prior inadvertent admissions, questions about his passport(s), etc., exist with sufficient basis in law and/or fact to warrant serious investigation and judicial review. So, like many others at the time, I sat back and waited for the media firestorm to begin. And I waited, and waited, and waited. Not a peep from the media, Hillary, McCain or Republicans. Why?
(Excerpt) Read more at australia.to ...
BTTT ... Bwahahahahahahaaha
FINALLY!!!!!!! we are whimps, the AUSSIES are not!!! shame, shame, shame on America!!
If CNN were to break the story, they’d make FOX look bad, now wouldn’t they?
Well maybe people will wake up and start cancelling their TV service because your cable & sat TV bill sends $1 a month to CNN, $1 to MSNBC/NBC/CNBC and so forth.
Fox? Fox is 20% owned by the Saudis who put up a large chunk of the $700 million used to blanket all the media with Obama during the election. Roger Ailes is a good guy but Fox is bought and paid for. They are better than the others but don’t expect anything from them. General Electric aka NBC/MSNBC/CNBC are probably the worst followed by CNN.
This will be a story unless a case moves forward and they are forced to "report" the facts. There will not be any investigative reporting, and you know as well as the rest of us, there is more than enough solid facts in more places that can and probably have been absorbed by many reporters....mums the word....Someone said "2008 was the year that journalism died"
Of course he qualified. He be light-skinned and don’t speak no Negro dialeck.
Finally someone asking the right questions out loud that too many in this country are ignoring. Anyone know why considering what is at stake?
I’d say it is far better than even money that the truth and this story blows up on Obama. The question is when?
“...I immediately recognized that this could be the biggest political scandal in U.S. history...”
This could be more than just a political scandal — this could turn out to be high treason on a large scale perpetrated by members of both parties and the MSM. Is there a statute of limitation for such a crime?
Hillary!? I bet she and
mohammed uh, hussein had a lovely conversation. She produced proof of his illegitimacy and threatened him with it.
He handed her the Hillary! dossier that soros prepared.
He'd only have to drop out of the race and claim he was always told he was born in Hawaii...
She'd be spending a long long long time in prison (possibly on death row?)
Guess who blinks?
McCain was born on U. S. offshore territory to parents who both were U. S. citizens, ensuring his constitutional eligbility.
Bigger than Watergate Bawawhahahaha, snerk, hahahahah.
AS far as political scandal goes, that’s a minor puff.
Teapot dome - W G Harding
The Crédit Mobilier, the Whiskey Ring scandal Ulysses S. Grant
Bill CLinton and the Chinese (Take your pick with Billy)
“MIss Halpin” (Maria Crofts Halpin,) Grover Cleveland (More than Monica for sure)
Ya Watergate was big, but so were a whole host of others.
I’m sure, in time, Bammy will be found out for something or the other.
The Republicans are and were stupid.
I have often wondered why Bill Clinton when impeached stayed in office. Were the gutless wonders bought off or threatened or what?
Every Republican senator signed Senate Resolution 511 in which “born of parents who are citizens” is the key argument, and place of nation of birth is barely mentioned; they were supporting the lie to the less informed that McCain was eligible. That the resolution (the third attempt by the Democratic Congress to insure that McCain, who received considerable Soros money, was their opponent) had no legal effect is irrelevant. It had the effect of calming the doubts of some who trust their representatives.
Does the Schutzstaffel, err, Secret Service have any jurisdiction over our friends in Australia?
Yes. OTOH,The DNC are crooks or communists or both. They know exactly what they are doing. Pat Caddell, Carter's pollster, made these remarks recently on a panel with David Horowitz
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.