Skip to comments.Obama’s Presidential Eligibility Scandal?
Posted on 01/12/2010 8:55:40 PM PST by circumbendibus
Did Hope for Rising GOP Stars like Bobby Jindal Play a Role in the Obamas Presidential Eligibility Scandal?
When questions about Obamas eligibility to serve as President arose, I immediately recognized that this could be the biggest political scandal in U.S. history, bigger even than Watergate. The allegations, if true, would have created widespread political turmoil and would have had to involve people, high up people, ignoring and/or covering up facts. How could a young Senator from Illinois have gotten so far, so quickly, in national politics without some in both the Democratic & Republican Parties taking notice, researching, discovering details of his past and recognizing that there was a BIG potential problem? Especially, given that every other person in Washington is a lawyer, people knew, the media had to have known, known both of the problem and its ramifications. After all, its the political big league in Washington.
Having a legal background, I decided to do my own research to satisfy my curiosity and it became abundantly clear that legitimate questions existed and continue to exist. Questions regarding interpretation of Article II, Section I of the Constitution, questions of original intent, British/Kenyan law, acquisition of citizenship, questions about Obamas birthplace, his adoption, his educational scholarships, his parents foreign allegiance/citizenship, his prior inadvertent admissions, questions about his passport(s), etc., exist with sufficient basis in law and/or fact to warrant serious investigation and judicial review. So, like many others at the time, I sat back and waited for the media firestorm to begin. And I waited, and waited, and waited. Not a peep from the media, Hillary, McCain or Republicans. Why?
(Excerpt) Read more at australia.to ...
It may ultimately fall to the military (who deserve to have a Commander In Chief who is in fact eligible to serve in that honored position and is legally capable of issuing lawful orders) to utilize the Uniform Code of Military Justice and demand that Obama establish the facts.
May I suggest Section 935. Art. 135. COURTS OF INQUIRY and possibly
Section 883. Art. 83. FRAUDULENT ENLISTMENT, APPOINTMENT, OR SEPARATION
Any person who—
(1) procures his own enlistment or appointment in the armed forces by knowingly false representation or deliberate concealment as to his qualifications for the enlistment or appointment and receives pay or allowances thereunder
[links provided at the bottoom of article]
Thought you guys might be interested.
The President is not Subject to the UCMJ.
That said, the very first law enacted by the first Congress was to codify the Declaration of Independence. IOW, the people have a legal right to overthrow the government and the Constitution bars the armed forces from getting involved on either side.
Get several hundred thousand patriots to march on Congress when Obama gives his state of the union address, and something could be done in a hurry. I don’t mean just marching on Congress, but marching into the House Chambers; in a non-violent manner, of course.
Thank you for the input, SeaHawk.
— FRegards ....
Ok, I was always assured that any child born to two American citizen parents on a Military base was a NBC. CO
They are, but not this guy and that’s the reason he was mum, yet Palin wanted to go there but was not allowed either!!!
Thanks for that info danamco. I always appreciate your posts. CO
Thank you too very much to stand strong with us against Cass Sunstein’s 24/7 ZERO-BRIGADE!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.