Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh - 10th Most Generous Celebrity per The Giving Back Fund
Giving Back Fund ^ | September 14, 2008 | Giving Back Fund

Posted on 01/14/2010 8:00:10 PM PST by Arec Barrwin

Oprah Ranked Most Generous Celebrity Pop Tags: Oprah Winfrey Posted on September 14th, 2008 by Eva Lam

Oprah Winfrey has been proclaimed the world’s biggest giver — again.

For the seoncd year running, the day-time host topped a list of the 30 most generous celebrities for giving $50.2 million US last year through the Oprah Winfrey Foundation and Oprah’s Angel Network, which fund education, health care and advocacy for women and children.

The list, now in its second year, was compiled by The Giving Back Fund, a charity that aims to encourage philanthropy.

Claiming the No. 2 spot was trumpeter Herb Alpert, who gave $13 million for education, including music lessons, through the Herb Alpert Foundation.

Three athletes also made the top 10, with cyclist Lance Armstrong, basketball star Michael Jordan and Canadian hockey player Eric Lindros giving $5 million each.

Here is the top 10 on The Giving Back Fund’s list of most generous celebrities (all figures in US dollars):

1. Oprah Winfrey, $50.2 million. 2. Herb Alpert, $13 million. 3. Barbra Streisand, $11 million. 4. Paul Newman, $10 million. 5. Mel Gibson, $9.9 million. 6. Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt, $8.4 million. 7. Lance Armstrong, $5 million. 8. Michael Jordan, $5 million. 9. Eric Lindros, $5 million. 10. Rush Limbaugh, $4.2 million.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: celebrity; giving; haiti; haitirelief; limbaugh; philanthropy
All those jackasses criticizing Rush over his charitable works should take a look
1 posted on 01/14/2010 8:00:11 PM PST by Arec Barrwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Arec Barrwin

It would be interesting if they renormalized the results to percentage of income.


2 posted on 01/14/2010 8:04:36 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arec Barrwin

Who’s Eric Lindros?


3 posted on 01/14/2010 8:05:00 PM PST by Huntress (Who the hell are you to tell me what's in my best interests?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huntress; Arec Barrwin

Nevermind. I should have read the whole article before asking.


4 posted on 01/14/2010 8:06:11 PM PST by Huntress (Who the hell are you to tell me what's in my best interests?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Arec Barrwin

Exactly how does a foundation work? Is all this money truly their money they are donating or do people donate to the foundation so they’re actually donating a lot of people’s money?


5 posted on 01/14/2010 8:06:46 PM PST by abigailsmybaby (To understan' the livin' you got to commune wit' da dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huntress

One helluva hockey player.


6 posted on 01/14/2010 8:07:45 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Arec Barrwin

Let’s not forget:
Algore $353
JoeBiden $369


7 posted on 01/14/2010 8:08:22 PM PST by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arec Barrwin

Rush gives the most as a percentage I bet.


8 posted on 01/14/2010 8:10:53 PM PST by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arec Barrwin

Hmmm, where is Al Gore? Didn’t he make $100 million last year telling us how we ought to live?
OK then, how about John Edwards? Oh, too busy paying for his love child.
Well then, I’m sure Bill Clinton should be on the list somewhere?
No, well then, Keith Olberman, Chris Matthews, Rachel Maddow? Oh, too busy trashing Palin.
Oh, I know, John and Tereza Kerry gotta be on the list. Oh, too busy flying to their seven houses.


9 posted on 01/14/2010 8:13:10 PM PST by Sir Clancelot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arec Barrwin

Most of the people on that list are Democrats which means they are giving the money to liberal causes,


10 posted on 01/14/2010 8:18:39 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arec Barrwin

Most of the people on that list are Democrats which means they are giving the money to liberal causes,


11 posted on 01/14/2010 8:18:44 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arec Barrwin

I am more interested in what charities they gave to.


12 posted on 01/14/2010 8:20:14 PM PST by Ronin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arec Barrwin

Who knew Herb Alpert was so generous? Good on all of them.


13 posted on 01/14/2010 8:20:56 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arec Barrwin

Liberals are very generous....with YOUR money.


14 posted on 01/14/2010 8:22:25 PM PST by festusbanjo (It's not that we tax too little, it's that we spend too damn much!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dila813; Arec Barrwin

Per various sources Rush’s annual broadcast contract is worth about $35 Million per year - thus his charity giving is at least 10% factoring in other possible earnings

Whereas Oprah has a stated net worth in 2009 of $2.7 billion


15 posted on 01/14/2010 8:22:25 PM PST by VRWCTexan (Obama-scare is the "real" Cash for Clunker Program!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

Who knew Herb Alpert had that kind of money?


16 posted on 01/14/2010 8:23:11 PM PST by cornfedcowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

Bump


17 posted on 01/14/2010 8:23:51 PM PST by LucyJo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: abigailsmybaby

Usually the way the foundation works is that a rich person gives a generous amount in seed money, which is then invested to produce an income for the foundation. After that, they can continue to make donations to the foundation, but a board of directors (on which the original donor may sit) determines how the money is allocated and invested. Forming the foundation creates a tax shelter for the original donor, though some of the control may be taken out of his hands. If he chairs the foundation, it may pay for his automobiles, house, entertainment expenses, etc., though this must be done with great care to avoid drawing the gaze of the IRS. This is how dead folks like Paul Newman can continue to give.

Somebody like Rush who just writes a check to a good cause may get a tax writeoff, depending on where the check is going, but it’s a less powerful tax shelter than a foundation.


18 posted on 01/14/2010 8:24:27 PM PST by ottbmare (I could agree wth you, but then we'd both be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ronin

Yes, that would be interesting. A liberal in my church who was promoting our pledge drive said that he considered his donation to NPR part of his charitable donations.

How about ACORN? PETA?

I mean it would be good to know.


19 posted on 01/14/2010 8:25:58 PM PST by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ronin

Good question. When I see Barbara Streisand on the list I can’t help thinking of all those “charitable contributions” she makes that are really nothing more than donations to political causes.


20 posted on 01/14/2010 8:26:13 PM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
I didn't know that he was that rich, nor that generous.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

21 posted on 01/14/2010 8:26:51 PM PST by ansel12 (anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood

Don’t forget bill Clinton donated some of his underwear.


22 posted on 01/14/2010 8:28:00 PM PST by InvisibleChurch (doctrine matters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

What do the 0bama’s give to charity?


23 posted on 01/14/2010 8:31:12 PM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

IIRC Lindros was the Quebec Nordiques’ number one draft pick in his debut season, and he refused to play for the team, choosing instead to throw a hissy-fit and sit the season out.

No excuse.


24 posted on 01/14/2010 8:31:18 PM PST by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: piasa

That’s what I am thinking as well. I would not be surprised if the biggest chunks of Streisand’s contributions went to NARAL, NOW or “charities” supported by both.

Bob Barker gave $5 Million to Sea Shepherd so they could buy a boat to harass the whalers. Does that count?

Rush is careful with his charitable dollars. He picks good causes and organizations. He wants to make sure the money he gives is spent on the people and things he donates it for. Not fatcat salaries or lobbyists.


25 posted on 01/14/2010 8:31:24 PM PST by Ronin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Arec Barrwin

Rush Limbaugh is not listed as a donor on their website. The Giving Back Fund. David Geffen is placed #10.

http://www.givingback.org/ click see complete list below Parade Intelligence


26 posted on 01/14/2010 8:32:40 PM PST by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arec Barrwin

What about Bob Barker? He gave $5 million to the whale whores.


27 posted on 01/14/2010 8:37:01 PM PST by The Good Doctor (Democracy is the only system where you can vote for a tax that you can avoid the obligation to pay.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: festusbanjo

“Liberals are very generous....with YOUR money.”

I have participated in Lance Armstrong Foundation events and know that it does great work and I have seen the work the Brad Pitt has done in New Orleans and both Lance and Brad are liberals who are doing great work with their money and the money they have raised.


28 posted on 01/14/2010 8:37:58 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

Unknown. Perhaps we will find out if their tax returns are made public. I suspect he gives an extra buck to the guy who repairs the WH teleprompters.


29 posted on 01/14/2010 8:38:06 PM PST by InvisibleChurch (doctrine matters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: cornfedcowboy

A&M Records


30 posted on 01/14/2010 8:38:49 PM PST by phormer phrog phlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: abigailsmybaby

Baically there are two types of foundations....private and community.

I set up a foundation under its own entity designed for my family to distribute chartible givings. In that vein I am the sole contributor to that foundation and may have my spouse, children as directors of the board.

It is classified under 503c and as a non profit orgaizatin it may exclude income tax, and as a charitble foundation it also may exclude property tax and sales tax.

as a private foundation the source is singular in nature in that is funded from and individual or corporation. The gransts are made to individuals or organized chariites, the private does not operae charities on its own.

To simply answer you question the private foundation DOES NOT donate other peoples money, it is the money from their soul source. Administart fees governed by 503 can be drawn and at least 5% of the foundation must be distibuted each year. yea


31 posted on 01/14/2010 8:38:57 PM PST by HiramQuick (work harder ... welfare recipients depend on you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

**we will find out if their tax returns are made public. **

I don’t claim my charitables on my 1040.. so that means I give $0.00?????


32 posted on 01/14/2010 8:40:48 PM PST by gwilhelm56 (OBAMA ... Orwell's 1984 was a WARNING ... NOT a TEXTBOOK!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar; Arec Barrwin
It would be interesting if they renormalized the results to percentage of income.

I'd like to know how much of this "giving" rolls back into their own coffers (like Tah-Ray-Suh Heinz-Kerry's Tide Foundation).

33 posted on 01/14/2010 8:41:19 PM PST by Grizzled Bear (Does not play well with others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Good Doctor

“What about Bob Barker? He gave $5 million to the whale whores.”

As I understand it, Mr. Barker earned that money and he may do with it as he wishes.

However, you are free to write a $5 million check to the whalers to counter the Barker money.


34 posted on 01/14/2010 8:42:14 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

“What do the 0bama’s give to charity?”

Carrots from the Whitey House garden.


35 posted on 01/14/2010 8:42:14 PM PST by Rembrandt (.. AND the donkey you rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Nice to hear about Herb Alpert. Check out his biography to see how he made all that money. He was a songwriter back in the day who penned many hits and was a founder of A&M Records. He is long married to the amazing Lani Hall who was one of the original girl singers with Sergio Mendes and Brasil ‘66. Herb and Lani still perform regularly and have a new album out. They gave $30 million in 2007 to USC for the music school. They are a great force for music in Los Angeles.


36 posted on 01/14/2010 8:43:06 PM PST by Irishgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: cornfedcowboy

Honestly, that was my first thought. I had no clue he was so wealthy.


37 posted on 01/14/2010 8:47:15 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: HiramQuick

My wife’s parents have also set-up a foundation with their money and it is distributed by my wife and her siblings. And they as a group decide where the money goes, most of which goes to children’s hospitals, educational institutions and their pet political causes.


38 posted on 01/14/2010 8:48:11 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Arec Barrwin

Man, do I ever hate that phrase, “giving back”.
For some reason it rubs me wrong.


39 posted on 01/14/2010 8:50:32 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gwilhelm56

I find it hard for any politico to pass up a chance to show how wonderful he is.


40 posted on 01/14/2010 8:55:28 PM PST by InvisibleChurch (doctrine matters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: HiramQuick; ottbmare

Thanks to both of you for your explanations. I learn something new on FR everyday that I log on. :)


41 posted on 01/14/2010 8:56:14 PM PST by abigailsmybaby (To understan' the livin' you got to commune wit' da dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Arec Barrwin
Still listen to Herb Albert as I cruise around in my 69 Vista Cruiser during the summer months. Can't beat that factory 8-Track sound. Dittos to Rush too. Chrissy Matthews must be bursting a vessel.
42 posted on 01/14/2010 9:08:37 PM PST by Lazlo in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arec Barrwin

LOL, love your screen name. Very interesting list, thanks for posting it. Herb Alpert #2, that’s amazing, makes me glad I bought the re-issue of his old Christmas album for hubby a year or two ago. (got good reviews, but hubby didn’t like it, too much old time-y goopiness). And nice to see Ms. Streisand up there too, I admit I can’t hate Barbara.

Good on them all for their generosity.


43 posted on 01/14/2010 9:10:18 PM PST by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irishgirl

So no messy divorces to wipe out his wealth.


44 posted on 01/14/2010 9:11:12 PM PST by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

“Man, do I ever hate that phrase, “giving back”.

I agree, it just rubs me the wrong way. I think it has to do with the connotation of “owing”. Not “give”, but “give back” like it’s a debt.

There is just something lefty/irritating about it.


45 posted on 01/14/2010 9:15:46 PM PST by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

“giving back” terminology has a certain “obligatory” feel to it so I understand your discomfort.

As for me?

“Nihil esse grato animo honestius”

(Nothing is more honorable than a grateful heart.) Seneca~


46 posted on 01/14/2010 10:57:43 PM PST by HiramQuick (work harder ... welfare recipients depend on you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: abigailsmybaby

You are very welcome ... a very limited explanation, but to cut to the chase it makes every dollar I give, work efficiently. I firmly believe in charitable giving, but I want it to be efficient from my end, AND more important I want the recipient to be efficient with my gift on their end as well.

For example, over 70% of money given to United Way is eaten up by their own administration costs, AND even though you designate an area, by law they do not have to honor your wishes. To me that is outrageous.

I tend to donate to charities where less than 10% of the gift is eaten up in admin costs. 10% may sound high, but in reality it is pretty reasonable.


47 posted on 01/14/2010 11:07:19 PM PST by HiramQuick (work harder ... welfare recipients depend on you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

good for them ... it is an efficient means of xsfer with a few tax benefits. It is what separates private industry from the public sector ... every thing i do is done in the most efficient way i knw how. Our govt .... seems to never have caught on to that concept.


48 posted on 01/14/2010 11:13:30 PM PST by HiramQuick (work harder ... welfare recipients depend on you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
"As I understand it, Mr. Barker earned that money and he may do with it as he wishes."

Sure is. Why wasn't he listed in the top 10 was the question.

49 posted on 01/15/2010 8:43:27 AM PST by The Good Doctor (Democracy is the only system where you can vote for a tax that you can avoid the obligation to pay.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson