Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hodes: I'm Done With Earmarking (Nervous Democrat Alert)
The Nashua (NH) Teleghraph ^ | 1/19/10 | Albert McKeon

Posted on 01/19/2010 6:06:14 AM PST by NewHampshireDuo

U.S. Rep. Paul Hodes announced Monday that he will no longer request federal money to finance projects in New Hampshire that benefit businesses, hospitals, police departments and colleges.

Hodes, a Democrat, said the appropriations process also known as earmarking is broken because many lawmakers abuse the system. He cited the poor economy and federal deficit as other reasons behind his newly adopted stance.

But Hodes denied that he is forgoing earmarking because he is running for U.S. Senate and stepping away from the controversial issue could benefit him politically, as the state Republican Party immediately claimed.

“There’s nothing I can do that my opponent will say nice things about me. The toughest thing politically for me is not the other side but the people who will be disappointed,” Hodes said in a telephone interview.

Those disappointed people will include those behind the dozens of companies, health agencies, conservation groups, municipalities and other public and private entities that have received federal money the past three years because of Hodes-stamped earmarks.

The Adult Learning Center in Nashua, for one, received a $97,000 earmark a few years ago thanks to Hodes. The money kept a literacy program alive for an extra 18 months while the staff tried to locate other forms of funding, the center’s executive director, Mary Jordan, said.

Losing Hodes as an earmark advocate is “disappointing,” particularly since ALC might someday seek federal funding for construction projects, Jordan said. But life brings changes, and ALC will have to adapt, she said.

Those seeking earmarks still can solicit the state’s other House representative, Carol Shea-Porter, a Democrat, and U.S. Sens. Judd Gregg, a Republican, and Jeanne Shaheen, a Democrat.

They and other members of Congress decide each year how tax dollars should be spent, allocating funds to various Executive Branch agencies and also earmarking some of that money for their own states.

Critics of earmarks claim they are nothing more than pork-barrel spending items aimed at pleasing constituents back home. But advocates, particularly lawmakers, argue that earmarks justifiably finance worthwhile projects that otherwise would not receive help from federal agencies.

“I know there are going to be folks disappointed,” Hodes said. “On the other hand, people will understand it’s time for the federal government to tighten its belt just like every household in New Hampshire.”

Earmarks have come under fire because some legislators accept donations from the people whose companies and organizations benefited from the appropriations, creating a “pay to play” game affecting the use of public money. Hodes last year proposed a bill that would have banned lawmakers from accepting political donations from the companies and lobbyists for whom they have secured earmarks.

“The bill has had some sponsors, but for whatever reason, the leadership hasn’t chosen to run (with) it,” Hodes said Monday.

As the process to start crafting the fiscal year 2011 budget approaches, Hodes said he decided to not earmark money because of those ethical issues and the need for fiscal austerity. He said he will also call on fellow members of Congress to end the practice.

Until now, Hodes hadn’t shied away from requesting appropriations despite his stated objection to abuses in the system.

For fiscal year 2010, Hodes last year submitted 64 earmarks totaling $230 million to House subcommittees, according to a Telegraph review of spending requests by New Hampshire’s four federal legislators.

The Telegraph has yet to calculate the legislators’ final total of earmarks approved for FY2010, but not every lawmaker’s request survives subcommittee scrutiny.

For fiscal year 2009, Congress approved 31 of Hodes’ earmarks, which totaled $35.6 million, according to the watchdog group Taxpayers for Common Sense. And for fiscal year 2008, Hodes secured $37.7 million through 37 earmarks for New Hampshire projects, according to a Telegraph review.

That Telegraph study of 2008 earmarks found Hodes had accepted some donations from a PAC group and two lobbyists that were connected to earmarks he sponsored. After being asked by The Telegraph about them, he said he didn’t realize the donations had come from earmark recipients and that he returned them.

Since then, Hodes has stressed he has a policy of not accepting donations from those connected to earmarks that bear his name.

Republicans pounced on Hodes’ announcement Monday. Ryan Williams, communications director for the New Hampshire Republican State Committee, called Hodes’ new policy “a desperate campaign ploy to distract from his abysmal fiscal record.”

Williams said Hodes backed “boondoggle” stimulus packages, supports a fiscally irresponsible health care plan and has secured millions in earmarks – making the announcement a “hollow political campaign year stunt.”

Williams said he couldn’t speak about the positions on earmarks held by Republicans seeking election. Hodes, who has represented the 2nd Congressional District since 2007, is seeking Gregg’s Senate seat in this year’s election.

Political analyst Dean Spiliotes said Hodes’ announcement is risky, but he is making it early enough in the campaign that many voters might not consider it a last-minute switch.

Republicans will criticize Hodes for previously requesting earmarks, but many people consider them to be a form of constituent service, said Spiliotes, who runs the Web site

TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New Hampshire
KEYWORDS: earmarking; federalgovernment; ussenate
It would be great to see this guy lose the Senate race.
1 posted on 01/19/2010 6:06:15 AM PST by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NewHampshireDuo
U.S. Rep. Paul Hodes announced Monday that he will no longer request federal money to finance projects in New Hampshire that benefit businesses, hospitals, police departments and colleges.

Yeah, right! Just like the alcoholic who will never take another drink.

We've got to run these guys out of town on a rail. They are rotten and evil.

2 posted on 01/19/2010 6:10:18 AM PST by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewHampshireDuo

If ever someone was ripe for a loss it is this guy. Lets hope that whoever takes the try is up to it and that our state hasn’t completely lost its mind. Then we wont even be able to complain that the massh$l$s ruined it anymore.

3 posted on 01/19/2010 6:12:57 AM PST by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewHampshireDuo

too late, no one believes you now. We are cleaning the ship of the rat infestations, the White House is next.

4 posted on 01/19/2010 6:15:20 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied, the economy died)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Technically,I’m a virgin again!

5 posted on 01/19/2010 6:19:36 AM PST by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NewHampshireDuo

So let me see if I understood what he just said.

Didn’t he just say that if the fine citizens of New Hampshire re-elect him, he promises to do NOTHING for them?

A remarkably honest statement...

6 posted on 01/19/2010 6:21:42 AM PST by null and void (We are now in day 363 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewHampshireDuo

Earmarking is nothing more than embezzling.

7 posted on 01/19/2010 6:33:24 AM PST by Paine in the Neck (Nepolean fries the idea powder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewHampshireDuo

Hodes is running scared...scared...scared!

8 posted on 01/19/2010 6:56:09 AM PST by Redleg Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewHampshireDuo
So now that everybody is watching the earmarks in an election year he's going to quit taking them? But before anyone paid attention then it was just fine and dandy?

Just another principled Democrat..../s

9 posted on 01/19/2010 8:02:52 AM PST by Reagan is King (Every immigrant who comes here should be required within five years to learn English or leave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson