Skip to comments.
Dems: Coakley down 10
MSDNC ^
| 01/19/10
| Norah O'Donnell
Posted on 01/19/2010 9:37:37 AM PST by freespirited
Edited on 01/19/2010 9:44:42 AM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
According to a top Brown campaign adviser, there are "longer lines outside Boston than inside. Not good sign for Coakley. Scott's voters highly motivated."
A Democratic source says get-out-the-vote efforts have been good for Coakley, but adds, "I don't know if the machine gets you 10 points."
(Excerpt) Read more at firstread.msnbc.msn.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ma2010; marthacoakley; scottbrown; turnout
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Poor Norah. This must be so hard on her.
To: freespirited
Its shaping up to be a crushing landslide win for Brown. SWEEET!
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find only things evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelogus
2
posted on
01/19/2010 9:39:24 AM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: freespirited
Everything I’ve been reading looks like this won’t be close.
3
posted on
01/19/2010 9:39:33 AM PST
by
goodolemr
To: freespirited
did Rush just read a quote from a Kennedy complaining that Coakley had campaign signs out before Ted’s corpse was cold?
4
posted on
01/19/2010 9:39:37 AM PST
by
GeronL
(http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
To: freespirited
The machine.
This is a battle of the people vs. the machine.
5
posted on
01/19/2010 9:40:51 AM PST
by
counterpunch
(In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
To: counterpunch
6
posted on
01/19/2010 9:42:05 AM PST
by
scooby321
To: GeronL
Glad this isn't Illinois because Coakley would pull a surprising surge around 6pm and by the time the polls closed she'd be called the winner by 8%
7
posted on
01/19/2010 9:42:40 AM PST
by
shadeaud
("If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten." -- George Carlin)
To: GeronL
I believe Scott’s leading, but I ain’t buying this.
I have NEVER seen a campaign willing to essentially say “all is lost” this early in the day. Campaign flacks are Baghdad Bobs right up until the concession speech. Unless you’re trying sew complacency on the other side.
Don’t fall for it, folks. VOTE!
To: counterpunch
The machine. This is a battle of the people vs. the machine.
Didn't they make a movie about that? The Terminator?
9
posted on
01/19/2010 9:44:58 AM PST
by
NEWwoman
To: scooby321
>>The people win<<
From what I’ve heard regarding Brown, this may be a HUGE win for the people of the US, but not much of one for MA. They’ll still be stuck with him, though the rest of us can revel in the Dem Supermajority being destroyed.
Not to mention the blow to O, Nancy, et al.
10
posted on
01/19/2010 9:45:11 AM PST
by
RobRoy
(The US today: Revelation 18:4)
To: GeronL
I dont know about signs, but she announced her candidacy within a couple days of his death. Pissed off the Kennedy family.
11
posted on
01/19/2010 9:45:16 AM PST
by
freespirited
(People talk about "too big to fail." Our government is too big to succeed. --Chris Chocola)
To: goldstategop
Its shaping up to be a crushing landslide win for Brown. SWEEET! That is VERY unlikely. Remember that the RCP poll average is skewed by the utterly absurd PJTV "poll" showing a 15% lead for Brown. And some other internet polls are suspect. It is also odd that Rasmussen refuses to do another poll since his "fial" Jan 12th one showing Coaklet +2. If Brown does win, I think it will be by thousands or perhaps hundreds of votes. With a margin of 500 or less, Coakley will win on a fraudulent recount.
To: freespirited
This is how Republicans win - when they run a solid center-right Republican who makes no apologies, is willing to fight the Rats, and who stays out of the social issue minefield without alienating evangelicals. Fricking Massassuchetts - I don't want to hear any more of this crap about how Republicans need to be "moderate" or "move to the middle" in order to win in the liberal Northeast.
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Praying for a nice comfortable victory. Senator Brown, that has a nice ring to it
14
posted on
01/19/2010 9:47:23 AM PST
by
shadeaud
("If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten." -- George Carlin)
To: shadeaud
In Mass, the Dems have had little need to cheat -—
Therefore, they suck at it!
No practice!
15
posted on
01/19/2010 9:49:09 AM PST
by
Kansas58
To: goldstategop
I find a landslide highly unlikely. I think the two key numbers are % of Democrats who crossover for Brown (must be north of 15%) and % of Independents who go with Brown (must be north of 65%) and even with that, I think it’s only a three point Brown win
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
And does not make that stupid, “I’ll reach across the aisle, my friends” crap a pillar of his campaign. Damn! I am still pissed I ever heard that!
17
posted on
01/19/2010 9:49:57 AM PST
by
Bad Jack Bauer
(Fat and Bald? I was BORN fat and bald, thank you very much!)
To: GeronL
did Rush just read a quote from a Kennedy complaining that Coakley had campaign signs out before Teds corpse was cold? That would be impossible unless hell froze over in late August of 2009.
18
posted on
01/19/2010 9:50:35 AM PST
by
Dahoser
(Separation of church and state? No, we need separation of media and state.)
To: GOP_Resurrected
Rush says NECN is saying most voters are leaning Coakley in their exit polls.
19
posted on
01/19/2010 9:52:56 AM PST
by
GeronL
(http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
To: RobRoy
So what’s your beef with Brown, anyway?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson