Yes, it was right here where we found the extra million votes for me.
An election official forgot that he left them there...
Posted on 01/19/2010 5:11:59 PM PST by icwhatudo
Rasmussen Reports has conducted an Election Night survey of 1,000 voters in the Massachusetts special election for U.S. Senate. Data will be released on this page throughout the evening.
Polls closed in Massachusetts at 8:00 p.m. Eastern in the race between Democrat Martha Coakley and Republican Scott Brown.
Preliminary results include:
* Among those who decided how they would vote in the past few days, Coakley has a slight edge, 47% to 41%.
* Coakley also has a big advantage among those who made up their mind more than a month ago.
* Seventy-six percent (76%) of voters for Brown said they were voting for him rather than against Coakley.
* Sixty-six percent (66%) of Coakley voters said they were voting for her rather than against Brown.
* 22% of Democrats voted for Brown. That is generally consistent with pre-election polling.
More data will be released soon.
He totally caved when the rats hurt his little feelers a few weeks ago.
Who cares what he says NOW when we'll know ourselves in a few hours? I guess he doesn't mind looking like a fool.
Exactly. Nobody knows where those totals are from.
Best chance we could have asked for. Just be patient and see what happens.
What we saw in Florida a few years ago was that a few highly populated democratic strongholds withheld reporting until they knew how many votes they needed to manufacture.
Great website to track the results:
http://www.boston.com/news/special/politics/2010/senate/results.html
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2010/by_county/MA_US_Senate_0119.html?SITE=AP&SECTION=POLITICS
All I know is... If Brown doesn’t win by at least 5 points - the rats will scurry up what they need to steal it.
Just like they always do.
“* 22% of Democrats voted for Brown. That is generally consistent with pre-election polling. “
If that holds, Brown wins easily. Brown probably needed around 10% of the Dem vote to ensure a win.
Bookmark
These numbers tell us nothing. They are just a teaser for election night and post election analysis.
From Jim Geraghty at National Review:
“Obama Towns Are Flipping To Scott Brown. Early Night, Folks.
In 2008, Ashland, Massachusetts went for Obama over McCain, 5,039 votes to 3,181.
Tonight Brown won Ashland 54 percent to 45 percent - 3,467 for Brown while Coakley carried 2,897.
You can call it, folks.”
- see http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YmJlNWE5MTYyYTNmNTRlYWJhNDVkN2U2MWMzODg0NTA=
8:32PM EST
Brown 52%
Coakley 47%
With 8% Reporting
Puhleeze.. have more faith than that.
Senate Special Election - Massachusetts
238 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
NAME VOTES Pct.
Scott Brown (R) 139,806 53%
Martha Coakley (D) 122,732 46%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 2,434 1%
WBZ TV
He also reports that minority wards such as Roxbury and Mattapan have turnout ~25%.
Brown: 53%
170,431 votes
Coakle: 46%
146,410 votes
13% reporting
coakley
chokeley
CROAKLEY
Oh here is a surprise. Cambridge, the home of Skippy Gates has Croakly 88%/11%
Senate Special Election - Massachusetts
459 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
NAME VOTES Pct.
Scott Brown (R) 254,686 53%
Martha Coakley (D) 224,421 46%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 4,520 1%
Yes, it was right here where we found the extra million votes for me.
An election official forgot that he left them there...
Have my out-of-state and dead voters arrived yet?
A big thank you to everyone posting results. I wish FNC was covering this, or at least have a sidebar box on screen while continuing with normal programming.
Keep telling yourself that.
“Obama Towns Are Flipping To Scott Brown. Early Night, Folks.
This is not the change I was talking about!
Something happened yesterday. The site was down, then Ras changed his tune. Dead fish or pay off?
Not so dummy anymore (if Voted for Brown)! ;).
As soon as I made my post, FNC is now covering this race, so nevermind my last comment, LOL!
Senate Special Election - Massachusetts
844 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
NAME VOTES Pct.
Scott Brown (R) 441,124 52%
Martha Coakley (D) 392,078 47%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 8,407 1%
| BROWN | 407,727 | 52% |
| CROAKLEY | 365,762 | 47% |
| KENNEDY | 7,760 | 01% |
Howie Carr just said that in Addington (sp?) Brown took 66% of the vote.
I got 53/46% Brown
Boston is 59/40 Croakley
Abington
Down near where Scott lives. The head of the MASS, Dem party lives there
GO SCOTT
| BROWN | 514,370 | 52% |
| CROAKLEY | 459,949 | 47% |
| KENNEDY | 9,865 | 01% |
44% in —Brown 52-47
53%
587,389 votes
46%
520,311 votes
52% reporting
| BROWN | 587,389 | 52% |
| CROAKLEY | 520,311 | 47% |
| KENNEDY | 11,146 | 01% |
53/46% Brown in Dartmouth so far.
That’s a good sign.
57% precints reporting, Brown up by 7%!
R: 0,638,823
D: 0,563,214
| BROWN | 653,782 | 53% |
| CROAKLEY | 575,357 | 46% |
| KENNEDY | 12,295 | 01% |
That is about what I am seeing.
Brown: 53%
715,962 votes
Coakley: 46%
630,859 votes
63% reporting
There are a LOT of smaller precincts that havent started reporting at all yet.
I have no Idea what it is like in these towns, so things are still very much in play.
Same with 60% vote in, still 53-46
I hope you’re right. I just checked the numbers and Brown won Norwood with 58.55%. He’s running better than Romney by 2-3 points at least.
| BROWN | 715,962 | 53% |
| CROAKLEY | 630,859 | 46% |
| KENNEDY | 13,693 | 01% |
DUmpocrap underground is getting despondent.
There are about 500,000 votes uncounted, she would have to get over 60% of the remaining votes to win. Not going to happen.
I dodged a $200 speeding ticket today-this is just GRAVY!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.