Skip to comments.Kerchner v Obama & Congress - U.S. 3rd Circuit Appeal - Appellant's Opening Brief - Filed 1/19/10
Posted on 01/20/2010 12:16:07 PM PST by rxsid
Kerchner v Obama & Congress - U.S. 3rd Circuit Appeal - Appellant's Opening Brief - Filed 19 Jan 2010
Attorney Mario Apuzzo has filed the Appellant's Opening Brief in the Kerchner et al v Obama et al lawsuit appeal. The Brief was filed with the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia PA. See this link to download and read it: http://www.scribd.com/doc/25461132/Kerchner-v-Obama-Appeal-Appellant-s-Opening-Brief-FILED-2010-01-19http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/01/kerchner-v-obama-appeal-appellants.html
We look forward to the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals reviewing this matter and ordering a trial on the merits as to the Article II Constitutional eligibility of Obama to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief of the military.
We say Obama is not a "natural born Citizen" of the USA and thus is not eligible to serve in the Oval Office. Obama is a Usurper and must be removed to preserve the integrity and fundamental law of our Constitution and our Republic.
"We the People" will be heard on this matter! As the People in Massachusetts have demonstrated, "We the People" are the Sovereigns in this country and the Constitution is the fundamental law of our nation, not Obama or Congress. We will not be silenced. The chair Obama sits in in the Oval Office is not his throne. It is the People's seat too. And Obama despite all his obfuscations to date must prove to Constitutional standards that he is eligible to sit in that seat.
This is not going to go away until Obama stops hiding ALL his hidden and sealed early life documents and provides original copies of them to a controlling legal authority and reveals his true legal identity from the time he was born until the time he ran for President. Obama at birth was born British and a dual-citizen. He holds and has held multiple citizenship during his life-time. He's a Citizenship chameleon as the moment and time in his life suited him and he is not a "natural born Citizen" with sole allegiance and Unity of Citizenship at Birth to the USA as is required per the Constitution per the intent of our founders and the meaning of the term "natural born Citizen" to Constitutional standards.
Attorney Apuzzo will comment more on this Appellant's Brief in the next few days.
Charles F. Kerchner, Jr.
Commander USNR (Retired)
Kerchner v Obama & Congress
HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN?
When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdoms dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.s children.http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate.html
Furthermore: Hawaii's Territorial Law, Chapter 57 - "VITAL STATISTICS, I", shown beginning pg 23 of 29, (the law in effect in 1961) allowed baby's born anywhere in the world to be eligible to apply for a Hawaii birth certificate.
"Kerchner v Obama & Congress - U.S. 3rd Circuit Appeal - Appellant's Opening Brief - Filed 1/19/10"
Maybe he’s in enough political trouble now that he will be considered unuseful, and someone will decide to let this go forward.
Waiting for Donofrio to join the party. The tide is turning.
From Queen to hut living; I don’t think Michelle is going to go for it. Where would she wear all of her finery?
“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, ...”
When an article or brief starts out FACTUALLY WRONG, I tend to discount anything else that is written. Hawaii in fact became a US STATE in August of 1959 TWO YEARS before Obama was born ( wherever that may have occured)
NO ONE has (to my knowledge) ever asked WHY HAWAII would set such a law.
Laws do not just 'happen'. There is always a reason.
What good purpose would such a law serve? What was the reasoning behind that law?
Who is the controlling legal authority? We trusted the DNC to present an eligible candidate and we relied on the GOP to vet the opposition, yet no one stepped up to the duty or fudged documentation.
What is factually wrong???
NOTHING.. He never said Hawaii wasn’t a state.. Move along Obot.
It’s my understanding that Hawaii issued “Certificates of Live Birth” NOT a Birth Certificate. One would only need to present a living breathing baby to be able to be issued the Certificate of Live Birth. These two things aren’t the same as I understand it. CO
NO ONE has (to my knowledge) ever asked WHY HAWAII would set such a law.
Laws do not just 'happen'. There is always a reason.
What good purpose would such a law serve? What was the reasoning behind that law?"
For a very simple, "in a nutshell" start...FOLLOW THE MONEY!
For further reading...an excellent reason can be found here. Other reasons have been discussed by many other FReepers as well. The reason's abound.
Bottom line, any and all reasons aside, the fact remains...HI did have such a law in place in 1961 (specifically), and long before that as well.
You bet anyone who doesn’t agree with your viewpoint has to be an Obot.
I know all you folks get really excited about Obama being born somewhere else but I will say again it makes no difference at this point. We can try and pass legislation at the state level to prevent it from ever happening again but SCOTUS is NEVER going to agree with you
This has been discussed before. Hawaii is a welfare state. They loaded the state up with people from other countries in the 1960s to get govt money. Probably lots of illegals for agriculture too. It was really a plantation for liberal white elites.
Send the Haitians there.
They actually issued birth certificates...check it out:
When an article or brief starts out FACTUALLY WRONG, I tend to discount anything else that is written. Hawaii in fact became a US STATE in August of 1959 TWO YEARS before Obama was born ( wherever that may have occured)"
Where's the "factual" inaccuracy in that article (or brief) regarding the time-line you mention?
He won’t be going to Kenya when he gets booted out. My prediction, he’ll have to go to somewhere (Rio?) where he can’t be extradited.
There may be a disgruntled CIA agent somewhere who might let something leak???
Also see Bishop Estate set up in 1884 in the will of the great granddaughter of King Kamehameha. He husband was Charles Bishop a banker. At least $10 billion in assets and lots of real estate and rotten to the core like the state of HI.
There was something on The Long Thread about Hawaii getting more federal money for each newly minted Hawaiian by birth. IIRC enabled new Hawaiian occupants to get federal welfare payments instantly.
Leo & attorney Steve Pidgeon are running the Chrysler dealers lawsuit for Quo Warranto. Quo Warranto through the DC District Court is believed to be the right venue. To have standing - someone has to have been harmed by Hussein. Who was harmed? Chrysler dealers.
He won't get a retirement salary because he never was legally the president.
Right, and great memory!
A GREAT memory would at least let me know who posted it on The Long Thread soes I could find it!
Ah, a modern Nostradamus that can see the future!
I say it does make a difference.
You’re an Eeyore.
A wet blanket.
Waving the white flag before the battle even starts.
Is your family motto “Surrender at all costs!”
It should have said something like “When Barack Hussein Obama Jr was purportedly born...etc”.
I can see the need for labor .. Hawaii growing
as a tourism location.
Pineapple plantation etc also needed manual labor. No mechanical back then.
Be sure and hold your breath while you wait.
I prefer to get active and make sure folks get elected to office who will defeat these proposals
Why in the world would you want to try and defeat a proposal that seeks to get the answer of weather or not Barry is Constitutionally qualified? Do the requirements matter to you?
By the way:
Just 51% of Americans believe Obama eligible
"As he loses public support for his agenda, the risk grows that this unaddressed issue could come back to haunt Obama, perhaps at a time when he can least afford it."
Maybe you’re not aware of this fact, but many people can focus on various tasks at once. It is not an “either/or” situation.
You seem strangely opposed to the vetting 0bama to determine whether he is actually eligible to hold the office of the Presidency. I wonder why. Wouldn’t you like to have the light of truth shine on his status?
I sure would.
Still, he issued a “Certificate of Live Birth”. It was not entitled a Birth Certificate. My birth certificate is a long yellow form with all sorts of information. Maiden name of the mother, name of the father, place of birth, doctor, date, etc. etc. You know what I mean. And then it even has a big red seal on it. Obama’s was not anything of the sort. NO information was contained or very little. Nothing much about the parents. Did you know that Isreal is the only place on earth that requires a child to be named after the mother? All other places require the name of the father. IF the father is unknown, it states that. CO
This might not be a first call by the SCOTUS. Our Founding Fathers wisely, intentionally and explicitly set the requirement and thus the definition of a natural born citizen into the Constitution by means of Article I Section 8 sentence number 9. With this they gave Congress the duty “To define and punish..... Offenses against the Law of Nations”. It is the Law of Nations that specifies a natural born citizen as one ‘born in the country of parentS who are it’s citizenS’. So Congress has a constitutional obligation to punish usurpers the like of BHO who offend(violate) the Law of Nations and as such the Constitution.Because BHO has admitted in his writigs that his father was a Kenyan as such subject to British rule at time of birth he admits to not meeting eligibility requirements. Indeed BHO is good to go if Congress will do it’s sworn duty to honor and defend the Constitution which FFs so thoroughly crafted.
What he “released” to the public isn’t what he would have been given in 1961. That law of 57, actually afforded foreign born baby’s an actual birth certificate. It’s right there in the law itself. Now...what would be stated on it as far as hospital and/or delivering Dr. (etc)? Who knows. That, is one of the 2 million dollar (spent) questions.
weather??? as in whether....at any rate. you have deliberately twisted any and all argunmentation. Fact is yes I care about the constitution but I also understand which battles can be won and which cannot. Go ahead and bang you drum slowly. Let us all know when the lights have been turned out.
you seem strangely obsessed with a losing position
when I find that I have fallen into a hole, I find it best to FIRST stop diggin
Yeah good luck with that argument.
Your purpose is to throw cold water on the topic of 0bama’s constitutional eligibility to hold the post of President.
I am wondering why.
Solid trustworthy freepers I know who think it’s more important to elect conservatives and vote 0bama out, and not worry about his eligibility, don’t even post on these threads.
They’re busy doing the things they deem worthwhile.
Yet you and your ilk, hang out on these threads dissing everyone who is concerned, and your excuse is that other aveneues are better to puruse.
Why the hell aren’t you busy pursuing other avenues? You’re wasting your time on a “losing” issue (trying to make it a losing issue is more like it).
You and the others like you are contradicting your very arguments by even posting on these threads.
Your very purpose is to paint those concerned with Constitutional eligibility as nuts and kooks.
I wonder why, it is obviously not because you want to further the conservative cause, or you’d be busy doing that.
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
Atty Apuzzo & CDR Kerchner on Revolution Radio Show hosted by Dr. Kate - Wed, 20 Jan 2010, 9:30 p.m. EST
Thursday, January 21, 2010
Atty Apuzzo & CDR Kerchner on Let's Talk Liberty Radio Show hosted by Chalice Jackson - Thurs, 21 Jan 2010, 9:15 p.m. EST
And yeah, I will continue to bang [that] drum slowly. I'm capable of multitasking.
"Let us all know when the lights have been turned out.
On Barry currently usurping the Constitution? Will do.
Excellent points! Great post.
Presumptive on your part. I am throwing cold water on nothing. I am stating what will inevitably happen to this ‘case’. Discuss it all you wish but do not delude yourself.
I and my ilk -— I guess that means you too since here you are posting-— oh but you only mean the folks who disagree with you. Okay so be it. Since it is FR I was under the silly notion that I was allowed to post my opinion even if it disagrees with yours
See post #49