No can do.
Now if it were a story about a Republican presidential candidate, that would be another matter altogether.
Hey, they tell the truth more often than the MSM. Shoosh, didn’t bammy get a Nobel, whats stopping the National Enquirer getting a Pulitzer. Did the NYT ever return the Pulitzer they won for shilling for Stalin? At least the WaPo recognized their Pulitzer was won on deceit. Just sayin.
John Edwards is one dead horse I don’t mind being beaten. What a total scumbag, and it turns out his wife was no saint, either. She knew what a POS he was all along.
More power to them. At least they do investigative journalism.
Why would we laugh? They should win it. When the LA Times editor puts out a memo even to their bloggers to kill the story, the new newspaper of record was the National Enquirer.
They rate the prize for this story.
They should win it and they deserve it.
Pulitzer winner National Enquirer. Nice sound to it.
Would love to be a fly on the wall in Arthur Sulzberger’s office when it is announced!
Why would we laugh. The National Enquirer broke the story, and the rest of the media ignored the information, on purpose at that!
Don’t they use the same judges as the Nobel Peace Prize?
AMEN!! They DESERVE it!!! They are ACTUAL REPORTERS....unlike the Enemedia that are nothing but STENOS.
Just the act of the Enquirer submitting the story to the Pulitzer committee for consideration would be a huge embarrassment for the dominant media. I would love to see the Enquirer follow through.