Posted on 01/22/2010 11:24:39 AM PST by yongin
SOCIAL CONSERVATIVE???
BEING FOR AMNESTY IS SOCIALLY CONSERVATIVE???
LETTING CONVICTED CRIMINALS OUT OF PRISON FOR NO REASON THAN YOUR OWN MISGUIDED SENSE OF COMPASSION IS SOCIALLY CONSERVATIVE????
Are you kidding me, just because the guy used to be a preacher doesn’t mean he tows a social conservative line.
i’ve never missed voting in any election in the last 51 years but I have witheld my vote for individual races if the Republican was a RINO and I will do it in the future!
>> Just as Mormons vote for Romney just because he is one of them, many Evangelicals will support Huckabee because Jesus commands it. <<
More Emotional Voting, rather than common sense thinking, just because you like someone on the pulpit (or how well they speak from a teleprompter) doesn’t mean they are going to make the best decisions in a position of power.
>> HUCK SUCKS BUT ONLY A RETARD WOULD STAY AT HOME INSTEAD OF VOTING FOR HUCK OVER OBAMA. OBAMA SUCKS A LOT MORE THAN HUCK <<
I could pinch my nose and vote for Huck over Bammy, but I would rather not have to.
For the time being he probably can. But when it gets time for the real thing, there will probably be more important people running. All it’s going to take is another person like Scott Brown to run against Obama, then Huck will be out.
No Huckster no Romneys’
There have to be better candidates in a country this large.
Eric Cantor?
Palin?
Bachmann?
Ted Nugent?
Amen. None of them.
I’ll stay home before I vote for this fraud.
DeMint/Palin 2012
If the Huckster is out-polling Obama, then a real, honest-to-goodness Conservative should blow “The One’s” doors off!
No Huckster no Bushes no Romneys.
+++++++++++ +++++++++++
Amen, amen, and AMEN !
The three easiest way for a used car salesman to gain power
is to become a preacher, a politician or get a TV show.
Huckabee can kiss my grits.
Huck changes his views like you change your socks.
He is all ego, it is all about him.
He spins his words to make a cute sound bite.
Huck does not have background in National Security
or the Military.
We don’t need anymore ego driven shysters in the White House
You should have read the poll. Palin loses to Obama 41-49. Here's what they said precisely...
"Sarah Palin trails Obama 49-41 largely because she loses 14% of the Republican vote to him, making her the only one of the GOP candidates we tested who Obama could get double digit crossover support against"
Public Policy Polling was the only pollster to predict exactly the outcome of the MA Special Senate election.
I did read the poll and posted a correction.
It is way too early to take any poll seriously - as I tried to point out with satire.
Sorry, I hadn't yet seen your correction.
Fox News poll has a showing Obama losing narrowly to a “generic GOPer”, 47-43.
However when paired against Newt, Palin, and Romney, Obama has double digit leads against all of them.
Do voters want the GOP to take a different direction?
Since they couldn’t get folks to go for Romney on the trial balloons, up goes Huck.
He’ll sink, too. Sorry lefties, we’re not putting up a sure looser this time.
Palin for President.
DeMint, Senate Majority Leader
Maybe JD Heyworth for VP?
Let McCain stay in the Senate. He is good with defense stuff. If we have a conservative majority, he can’t do any harm with amnesty legislation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.