Skip to comments.Obama canít take our guns, so heís got his UN and international stooges trying: we canít let them
Posted on 01/23/2010 11:42:53 AM PST by jmaroneps37
Stealthy but well funded United Nations maneuvers to strip American citizens of their legal right to keep and bear arms are well underway.
The UN agenda is to push countries to adopt a universally binding treaty that would supersede our U.S. Constitutions Second Amendment.
A very important video by NRA investigative reporter Ginny Simone explaining this threat has been removed from youtube, but you can still access it at www.ammonland.com or on the NRA web site. Simone takes viewers to the London headquarters of IANSA-International Action Network for Small Arms- a global network to stop proliferation and misuse of small arms and light weapons. She shows us IANSA is plotting to tear down the Second Amendment.
IANSA head Rebecca Peters said, Its time (for) tough, tough gun laws, after she successfully pushed through a binding gun ban treaty in Australia. Simone reports Peters has an endless supply of dollars to wage a successful anti gun propaganda campaign here in America.
Seemingly endless amounts of dollars appear available to IANSA from over 800 NGOs-non governmental organizations- with Japan donating $1.87 million and Britain giving a 2 million dollar grant. U.S. citizens dont have the blanket right to use guns as they see fit, declared Amnesty Internationals Henry Smith.
Slow but steady erosion worldwide
In NYC Rick Cowan, a retired hero detective, was stripped of his right to carry after a simple automobile wreck. Even though Cowan infiltrated the mob and got medals for his bravery, he now is on the departments No Carry list. Law abiding Louisiana citizens saw their guns confiscated after Katrina, and the Philippine government just instituted a nationwide gun ban to stave off violence for an election that wont happen until May.
A North Carolina anti gun Democratic state senator..
(Excerpt) Read more at collinsreport.net ...
perhaps this the reason for the interpol change to our constitution... they are not subject to it now.. world police force for us? could be ...
He won’t take your guns. He will follow Hillary Clintons idea of controlling your ammunition. California has already implemented something along these lines.
all the more reason to make your own...
Look at it this way: How many firearms owners in this country will it take to stop this? There are approximately 100,000,000 firearms known to exist in this country. It only took 3% of the population to fight and win the Revolutionary War. What's 3% of the number of firearms owners? Millions.
Link? Couldn’t find one.
blue helmets make pretty targets ,,, had a picture on the “old ‘puter” that someone sent me about one of the national shoots ,where they use blue helmets as targets.
U.S. citizens dont have the blanket right to use guns as they see fit.
I think the blue helmets will revolt and say “Hell no, we won’t go” before we need to.
I know if I was a UN troopie, I would tell them, throw me in the stockade, I am not going to go to the US and take guns.
I think we finally have our impeachable offence. Lets go for it. He is going against the constitution. What say you?
Don’t worry about the blue helmets, it will be your local PD and sheriffs department doing it. Some of them will feel bad about it, but they will do it anyway. It just depends on how much resistance can be formed and how persistent the resistance is.
Tell ol’ Henry to drag his flaky ass out here where I live and tell these folks around here that they dont have that right. Henry will be toast.
we are going for it one piece at time.. this will unravel .. timing is everything... lets let him make some more big mistakes........
Obama cant take our guns, so hes got his UN and international stooges trying: we cant let them
>U.S. citizens dont have the blanket right to use guns as they see fit, declared Amnesty Internationals Henry Smith.
Actually they _DO_. Even to the point of murder, anything else would be towards the [criminal] punishing/prosecution of ‘might’ or ‘could’ instead of the factual ‘did’... and who wants to live in a [legal] world where you are punished for what you have the capability of doing? I wouldn’t want to be convicted of rape and/or murder because I technically _COULD_, would you?
I’ve said it before, I swear I will try to kill anyone who attempts to take my legally owned firearms.
Ive said it before, I swear I will try to kill anyone who attempts to take my legally owned firearms.
They really don’t get it,,do they? We have guns as a natural right. We won’t turn them in like good brits and aussies. We aren’t coming for them,, but when they come for the American guns, they will get a quick education on American exceptionalism.
Such an attempt would result in massive, massive civil (hopefully) disobedience.
They better bring a few boatloads of body bags with them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.