During the entire first calendar year of his administration, Mr. Obama's mainstream media coverage was almost "perfectly balanced" he rated 49 percent positive and 51 percent negative evaluations by sources and reporters.
posted on 01/26/2010 11:04:57 AM PST
(We have the 1st so that we can call on people to rebel. We have 2nd so that they can.)
Tell that moron to get real. Balanced? No Fn way.
posted on 01/26/2010 11:07:25 AM PST
“By Sources” must mean bloggers and posters (including every negative comment on FR about BO.
posted on 01/26/2010 11:09:34 AM PST
(If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
It makes you wonder what they consider negative. Not openly gushing and drooling and more “nuanced” praise instead?
posted on 01/26/2010 11:10:00 AM PST
by secret garden
(Civilization exists by geological consent, subject to change without notice.)
You mean the CMPA isn’t balanced? /sarc
I do believe his media praise is going to start taking a hit.
posted on 01/26/2010 11:11:58 AM PST
(But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
All news vs. FOX I guess= balanced?
posted on 01/26/2010 11:48:03 AM PST
(CNN is not credible.)
This guy was dropped on his head as a baby. 49/51?
I would say, 80/20 and not like, excluding talk radio, Washington Times and Fox.
posted on 01/26/2010 11:57:59 AM PST
(Felipe Calderon supports the public option.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson