Skip to comments.Orly Taitz seeks support for political Campaign - AIMS FOR CA ATTY-GENERAL OR SEC-OF-STATE OFFICES
Posted on 01/26/2010 1:45:46 PM PST by rxsid
Orly Taitz seeks support for political Campaign
AIMS FOR CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY-GENERAL OR SECRETARY-OF-STATE OFFICES
(Jan. 25, 2010) Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., arguably the most famous personality of the popular movement seeking to remove Obama from office on the grounds that he is ineligible constitutionally, has announced her interest in preparing to campaign for political office.
Lead counsel in the case Barnett et al. vs. Obama et al., Taitz entered the public forum last year with her representation of Ambassador Alan Keyes, Gail Lightfoot and others on the California ballot, who sued Deborah Bowen, the California Secretary of State, regarding the admission of Obama to the ballot.
It seems that if Orly Taitz ran for California Secretary of State, she would garner the greatest financial support, since it is obvious that if she won that office, Obama would never be elected president again. Her campaign for such an office, therefore, would garner the support all those wishing to rid the country of Obama." Continued:
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
"Orly Taitz seeks support for political Campaign"
I wonder if those that ridicule her for her efforts as a lawyer, but who allegedly say they are concerned about the Barry eligibility question or those that say they want to see him politically defeated....if they will support her in this cause?
This is what she should do...since it’s apparently so easy to get a HI certification of live birth, she should obtain one for herself. Then, she should file the paperwork to run for president. Then, when the California Secretary of State moves to keep her to keep off the ballot, she’ll actually have a legitimate 14th Amendment issue upon which to build her new round of lawsuits.
EVERY state should force Presidential candidates to prove that they meet the qualifications set forth in The Constitution. Internet copies and third party certifications don't cut it.
indeed, what a novel idea huh? who would be against something like that??
wait, we know the answer to that.
She should dye her hair red, marry a guy named Ricky and star in her own reality show.
Orly Taitz is directly on the mark, an American hero. What a pity that some posting here try to discredit her. She will be proven correct and the proof will be loud and clear and none will be able to keep sweeping it under the rug. Orly Taitz is one of the most intelligent, patriotic and smartest women in America. Those who have suffered under totalitarian regimes are at the forefront of sounding the alarm warning us about the real totalitarian enemies operating within America. Brigitte Gabriel is another such heroic American woman. Would that we took their warning as seriously as we should.
Only Obama would have the audacity to run for an office for which he is constitutionally unqualified. The man has no shame; no conscience.
Well do say....... LOL
What a pity that some posting here try to discredit her.
Really?.... It seemed to me that Orly was the chief leader of the discrediting.
I was a lurker during the last election but decided to email, write and call our Sec. of State (Jan Brewer, who became our Governor).
NEVER received an answer as to how BO was certified in AZ as being a natural born citizen. I guess she thought I didn’t have *standing* to make such a request.
Had I not been reading FR the thought would’ve never occurred to me to even question it.
It would be fun, though, to see her file her birth certificate, naturalization records, college transcripts, kindergarten records, tax returns, traffic citations, dental malpractice claims, personal lawsuits, and California Bar complaints...I think Orly's records might prove far, far more entertaining than Obama's...
No way. I won’t support her. If she really is as incompetent as she seems to be (and I believe she is), then I wouldn’t want her in an elected office, even in CA.
Her running for elected office just further proves to me that she’s an attention whore and was likely motivated all along by personal aspirations rather than the good of her clients.
So then that qualifies her to run as a Democrat, right???
1. Thank goodness for FR and
2. Of course they didn't respond. They couldn't possibly demonstrate how they certified him being eligible.
Sure. One doesn’t have to be competent or moral to be a libtard.
She has a dental degree and a juris prudence degree so she’s nobody’s fool. Maybe doesn’t yet have experience. I know that if she were elected Attorney General one of the first items on her agenda would be to demand proof of Obama’s eligibility and his certification by Ca. state, and would be in a position to do so. Intrigues me.
This is going to be fun to see how long it will take for all the lemmings to wake up, already a few have surfaced!!!
I’ve done the same with Florida SoS and his boss Crissy. The silence is deafening!!!
In listening to her and reading what she writes and does, I have found her to be not at all an attention seaker, but rather a sincere person animated and energized by the outrage of Marxist Obama becoming president when he doesn’t qualify to run for the office. This woman knows that her adoptive country allows her to speak, unlike the one from which she came, and she’s exercising her right to speak and act within the law to get redress for the illegal activities that surround Obama. Would that other Freepers had her determination to have the truth emerge from the hidden and still missing key information needed to qualify Obama to run for president.
Speaking of California laws and precedent on this very issue (eligibility):
California Judge Ruling in Keyes Lawsuit on Obama Qualificationshttp://www.ballot-access.org/2009/03/13/california-judge-ruling-in-keyes-lawsuit-on-obama-qualifications/
March 13th, 2009
On March 13, California Superior Court Judge Michael Kenney tentatively ruled against Alan Keyes, in the lawsuit concerning whether President Barack Obama meets the constitutional qualifications to be president, and whether the California Secretary of State should have put him on the ballot. The case is Keyes v Bowen, 34-2008-8000096-CU-WM-GDS. The 6-page opinion seems to strengthen the rights of political parties to place anyone they wish on the November ballot, regardless of that candidates qualifications.
The decision says, Defendants contend that Election Code sec. 6901 requires the Secretary of State to place on the ballot the names of the candidates submitted to her by a recognized political party and that she has no discretion to override the partys selection. The Court finds that the First Amended Petition fails to state a cause of action against the Secretary of State Federal law establishes the exclusive means for challenges to the qualifications of the President and Vice President. That procedure is for objections to be presented before the U.S. Congress pursuant to 3 U.S.C. section 15.
In 1968, the California Secretary of State refused to list Eldridge Cleaver on the November ballot as the presidential nominee of the Peace & Freedom Party. Cleaver and PFP sued the Secretary of State, but the State Supreme Court refused to hear the case, by a 6-1 vote. Cleaver and the party then asked the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene, but that Court refused, 393 U.S. 810 (October 7, 1968). In this current Keyes lawsuit, attorneys for the Defendants claimed there was no such lawsuit. The attorney for Keyes did not have the California Supreme Court citation (58 Minutes 411), nor the U.S. Supreme Court cite, so he wasnt able to establish the existence of this 40-year old precedent that does seem to give the Secretary of State the authority to refuse a partys choice for president, if the Secretary of State thinks the party chose someone who doesnt meet the constitutional qualifications. Keyes will appeal and his appeal will include the Cleaver precedent citation.
Eldridge Cleaver had been removed from the California ballot because the Secretary of State had learned that he was only 33 years old.
Looks to me that the ruling was made to kick the case one more step up the ladder to the SCOTUS.
"I will officially announce my candidacy for the position of the Secretary of State tomorrow at the Republican state assembly at the Buena Park resort."http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=8602"
I have set a separate bank account with bank of America. Any checks with campaign contributions please address to Orly Taitz for Secteretary of State 2010″.
The web site and business cards are being made. See attached link. Any and all help is being appreciated.
Obots, please dont waste your time writing garbage to me or about me. In case you didnt realize until now, I have enough strength of character to go beyond what you are doing."
"A complaint and request for investigation was forwarded to the Registrar of Voters regarding information received, stating that declared candidate for the position of Secretary of State Damon Dunn was a registered Democrat for 10 years, and for the first time voted as a registered Republican in a special election in May of 2009, less then a year ago, therefore not fulfilling 12 months requirement to run in the Republican primary."http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=8600"
This complaint is being handled by Mr. Carl Crucillo, office of the Registrar of voters, phone 714-567-7560, fax 714-567-7556. As it stands right now, it looks like Damon Dunn cannot run as a Republican candidate for the Secretary of State."
When it’s all said and done, she and CA might be a good fit. Not that Hussein will have the nerve to run again, at least she’d be there to stop him.